The meaning of a representation can be nothing but a representation. In fact, it is nothing but the representation itself conceived as stripped of irrelevant clothing. But this clothing can never be completely stripped off; it is only changed for something... Gender, I-deology: Essays on Theory, Fiction and Film - Seite 98herausgegeben von - 1996 - 465 SeitenEingeschränkte Leseprobe - Über dieses Buch
| Richard Milton Martin - 1980 - 328 Seiten
...from which all that follows from the first assertion equally follows, and vice versa."9 And again, "the meaning of a representation can be nothing but...stripped off; it is only changed for something more diaphanous."10 Peirce goes on to say that "there is an infinite regression here" — but not so in... | |
| Salabert, Pere - 1985 - 504 Seiten
...is the interprétant... The meaning of a representation can be nothing but a representation. In/act, IT IS NOTHING BUT THE REPRESENTATION ITSELF CONCEIVED AS STRIPPED OF IRRELEVANT CLOTHING», Ch. S. Peirce, Collected Papers, I, p. 171. tutario y codificable de la especularidad. [Lo significativo... | |
| William Elford Rogers - 2010 - 257 Seiten
...representation. In fact, the only way you can convey your visual imagination to me is by representing it to me: "The meaning of a representation can be nothing but...itself conceived as stripped of irrelevant clothing" (CP, 1.339). That is, you did not give me a detailed description of your imagining, nor did you tell... | |
| Richard J. Parmentier - 1994 - 244 Seiten
..."naked thought itself," since that would imply the collapse of fully triadic semiotic relationships: "The meaning of a representation can be nothing but...it is only changed for something more diaphanous" (CP 1-339)The Trichotomies Peirce's distinctions among kinds of signs can be summarized by returning... | |
| Dinda L. Gorlée - 1994 - 260 Seiten
...interpretants: The meaning of a [sign) can be nothing but a [sign]. In fact, it is nothing but the [sign] itself conceived as stripped of irrelevant clothing....here. Finally, the interpretant is nothing but another [sign] to which the torch of truth is handed along; and as [sign], it has its interpretant again. Lu.... | |
| Berit Holmqvist - 1993 - 514 Seiten
...interpreted, and these interpretations in turn are proposed as signs in new interpretations. As Peirce states: The meaning of a representation can be nothing but...but the representation itself conceived as stripped off irrelevant clothing. But this clothing never can be completely stripped off; it is only changed... | |
| Kenneth Laine Ketner - 1995 - 476 Seiten
...glance certain quotations from Peirce seem to support the principle of an infinite interpretative drift: The meaning of a representation can be nothing but...diaphanous. So there is an infinite regression here [CP 1.339]. Can we really speak of unlimited semeiosis apropos of the hermetic ability to shift from... | |
| Ulrich Winter - 1998 - 452 Seiten
...be nothing but a representation. In fact, it is nothing but the representation itself conceived äs stripped of irrelevant clothing. But this clothing...diaphanous. So there is an infinite regression here. (CP 1.339) Objektrepräsentation durch Zeichen läßt sich als prinzipiell infinite rekursive Verkettung... | |
| Ralf Müller - 1999 - 296 Seiten
...the representation itself conceived äs stripped of irrelevant clothing. But this clothing can never be completely stripped off; it is only changed for something more diaphanous" (CP 1.339). Die Bedeutung als in einer kontinuierlichen Folge von Interpretanten konstituiert, ist... | |
| Susan Petrilli - 2000 - 272 Seiten
...translation theory of meaning also have to be approached with caution. Once, he put the idea this way: The meaning of a representation can be nothing but...off; it is only changed for something more diaphanous (CP 1.339). The first sentence in this passage is more reliable than the image that follows. The latter... | |
| |