 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1918
...where the interStatc and intra-State transactions of carriers are so related that the government of one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, which is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rules therefor. 4. SAME — authority to determine... | |
 | 1914
...opinion occurs this significant sentence : " Wherever the inter-State and intra-State transactions are so related that the government of the one involves...Congress and not the State that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule." Aside from Government ownership, there seem to be four alternative ways... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1914
...order the Supreme Court held that — Wherever the interstate ami iutrastate transactions of curriers are so related that the government of the one involves...Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would he denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby, John Archibald Fairlie, Frederic Austin Ogg - 1915
...state to a point within the state was a discrimination against interstate commerce and it says that "wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1914
...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...Congress, and not. the State, that is entitled to preOpinion of the Court. 234 US scribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1914
...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to preOpinion of the Court. 234 US scribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1914
...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to preOpinion of the Court. 234 US scribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1914
...operations of such carriers.lrom \ being made a means of injury to that which has been con- / fided to "Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...Congress, and not the. State, that is entitled to pre- , Opinion of the Court. 234 US scribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1914
...the decree of the Commerce Court and sustaining the Commission's order the Supreme Court held that— Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | Herbert Confield Lust - 1917 - 718 Seiten
...Texas Ry. v. United States, 234 US 342, 58 L. ed. 1341; 84 Sup. Ct. 833. In that case the court said: "Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress and not the state that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
| |
Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise... 
