Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

of his brother, and, though certainly not so important, more generally read and enjoyed. The year of Sir William's birth was that in which Dr. Thomas Reid published his Essays on the Active Powers. The old man, now in his seventy-eighth year, but still fresh and hale, inhabited an official residence in the College, and for a few years longer went out and in there, while the future corrector and editor of his Philosophy grew up under his eyes, a bright-eyed and playful child. After attending the Glasgow Grammar School for some years, William, at the early age of twelve, entered the junior Latin and Greek classes of the University, then taught by Richardson and Young. Both were men of fiue scholarship, and Young, in particular, so invested his subject with the fascination of genius, that his teaching became memorable to his pupils in after life. In 1801 Hamilton was sent to school in England, first, for a short time, to Dr. Horne of Chiswick, afterwards to Dr. Dean of Bromley. Already he expresses himself with Hamiltonian emphasis: he "hates and execrates" speaking at "public nights" in the school; he even hates England generally, and earnestly desires to know where he is to spend the Christmas holidays. His mother sternly rebukes his impatience, and hopes to have the satisfaction of hearing that he will attend to what she has lately said, that he will weigh its importance, and strive more than ever to do his duty and submit cheerfully to what she requires, in which case she will perhaps think of seeing him soon in the spring. In 1803 he was recalled home, to re-enter the University. The intervening months were spent by him and Thomas in the manse of Mid-Calder, under the kind and careful superintendence of the Rev. Dr. Sommers. William, though already marked by sedateness and power of application, as contrasted with his more dashing and volatile brother, was as fond of sport as a manly boy should be, and the acknowledged leader of his companions in all feats of strength and dexterity. As a vaulter and swimmer he was particularly distinguished, both there, and afterwards at Oxford. In after years he generally spent part of the long vacation at Mid-Calder, where his presence was always hailed with enthusiasm by the boys. As a specimen of the prodigies of strength with which he was wont to delight them, one of them has recorded that Hamilton allowed him to stand on his outstretched palm, and so held him in the air. Writing to his mother from Mid-Calder for the first time, he informs her, "Mother, you have lost your wager, for I asked Mr. Sommers and Mr. Cruickshanks

[ocr errors]

both, who both were astonished at me asking such a question, as any child of ten years old knows that the sun is nearer us in winter than in summer." These authorities he fortifies, as was his manner afterwards in graver discussions, by an additional "testimony" in the shape of an extract from a French geography.

In the winter of 1803 he attended the senior Latin and Greek classes, and also those of Logic and Moral Philosophy, taught respectively by Jardine and Mylne. In both of the latter he carried off the first prize. During the ensuing vacation, Dr. Sommers writes to his mother: "William, I see, is very anxious to become his own master, which has rendered it necessary for me to be excessively pointed and strict in everything I require of them all. He, in particular, is very much inclined to be idle, although more studious than at first." The inclination to idleness in vacation time may be forgiven, when it is known that the youths were daily occupied from seven in the morning to one, and from six to eight in the evening. Another youthful weakness the good Doctor finds in need of frequent correction,

"their extravagance in clothes, and needless absurd expenses." The two following winters were spent in Glasgow, where, besides the usual literary classes, Hamilton attended Chemistry, Botany, and Anatomy, with a view to the study of Medicine, which naturally had attractions for him. The winter of 1806 was spent in Edinburgh, and seems to have been devoted exclusively to medical studies. The extravagance of which Dr. Sommers complained was now getting concentrated on one luxury,-books, of which the young philosopher had already begun to be a "hunter," in Mr. Burton's best sense of the term. Apologizing to his mother on this head, he assures her that the bank-notes have only changed their shape, and suffered "the glorious metamorphosis of being converted into historians, and philosophers, and poets, and orators, and, though last not least, into physicians.'

In 1807 Hamilton entered Balliol College, Oxford, as an Exhibitioner on that Snell Foundation which has sent so many distinguished Scotchmen from Glasgow to Oxford. Here he prosecuted his studies with extraordinary vigour, and at the final examination for his degree acquitted himself with unparalleled distinction. The course of instruction then pursued there was little calculated to call forth independent thought or effort, "the tutors," to use words of his own, "whistling to their pupils the old tune, which, as pupils, had been piped to them." Hamilton was in fact his own tutor, and pre

both that they never could bear to tell the story, and though they did not meet again, their mutual kindly interest in each other still continued warm in spite of outward estrangement. Mr. Christie and Mr. Traill have contributed to this biography some reminiscences of Hamilton, which are not only highly interesting, but very remarkable, at once in their vividness and their harmony of impression, considering that they go back to a period nearly sixty years ago. The following extracts are from Mr. Christie's sketch:

:-

"Hamilton's intellectual eminence has been acknowledged by the world, but I do not happen to have met with any adequate appreciation of the qualities of the man. He was, as I knew him, the most noble-minded, the most generous, and the most tender-hearted of men. I wish I were able to convey a just notion of the singular beauty and nobleness of his perfectly-formed features, deep-set black eyes, most intellectual countenance. His oval face, olive complexion, his waving black hair, which did not conceal his noble forehead, combined as happily to give the result of perfect manly beauty as it is possible to imagine.

sents one of the most singular instances of a great scholar and thinker who owed little or nothing to any living man, in the way either of direct instruction or of moulding influence. The great subject of study was, of course, Aristotle; but though Hamilton acquired a perfect knowledge of his works, and a veneration for his genius, which rather increased than diminished with years, the monotony of the course of study was intolerable to him. "I am so plagued," he says to his mother, "by these foolish lectures of the College tutors, that I have little time to do anything else: Aristotle to-day, ditto tomorrow; and I believe that if the ideas furnished by Aristotle to these numbskulls were taken away, it would be doubtful whether there remained a single notion. I am quite tired of such uniformity of study." It argued wonderful vigour of mind in a youth under twenty, not merely to resist the deadening influence of such a servile system, but to pursue, unaided, in the midst of it, a course of study far transcending the ordinary bounds of Oxford reading, and embracing authors whose very names are familiar only to the learned. In addition to his "The studies which Hamilton pursued were philosophical and literary studies he still de- perfectly in harmony with the Oxford studvoted some of his time to anatomy, and dis-ies of those days; but it so happened that sected with Sir Christopher Pegge. So lit- he owed little to the actual teaching of Oxford. He was the only pupil of a Fellow of the Coltle also was he of a mere book-worm, that a lege, who was himself a singular, if not a restranger meeting him at this time would markable, character. (Mr. Powell, the Daniel probably have set him down as a thoroughly Barton of Lockhart's Reginald Dalton.) This "good fellow," without pretension or pedan- gentleman lived in rooms in the tower over the try, ready to join in any manly fun, and gateway of the College, and led the life of a whose athletic qualifications were of a kind hermit. He never attended hall or chapel, nor that might be called "topping." His let-ties of the College. He was a powerfully made held any intercourse with any of the authoriters to his mother are full of simple and confiding, but undemonstrative affection. He occasionally reports his purchases of books, especially when he has got a bargain. In an old shop near St. Giles's, in London, he lighted on a treasure, which he thus announces, "I paid £0, 4s. Od. for-oh, incredible!-a Ms. volume, which, on my examining it at home, I found to be most beau tiful illuminated Mss. of the Rhetoric and the book on Invention of Cicero, and another MS., at the end of the volume, of Macrobius. The man was completely ignorant of the treasure he possessed. They are at least six centuries old."

Among his most intimate friends were J. G. Lockhart, J. H. Christie, barrister, and James Traill, now a magistrate in London. With Lockhart his intimacy was peculiarly close and affectionate, both at this time and during their early years at the Bar. It unhappily terminated some time about 1818, through some cause probably connected with the bitter political feuds of the time. Whatever the cause, the breach was so painful to

man, with rather a striking countenance, who appeared to have totally sequestered himself from his fellow-creatures. No one but his servant ever entered his rooms. He walked out

frequently, but always alone. He was never seen to speak to any one. It seems, however, that he had accepted Hamilton as a pupil, but the pupil and tutor soon discovered that they were by no means necessary to each other, and in fact, before I came to the College, had ceased to have any intercourse. He must, however, have been a man of some mark, for he had inspired Hamilton (who was not given to overrate men) with respect. It thus happened that Hamilton had no teacher, and was strictly a solitary student; for though it was not unusual for us to join in our readings, Hamilton had no companion in his studies. . . . Though, as I have said, Hamilton was a solitary student, he was far from an unsocial man. When he joined in the festivities and amusements of the place, he did so with buoyant spirits and thorough enjoyment. His manners, though without the slightest taint of coarseness or vulgarity, were brusque, but thoroughly agreeable. I wish I could convey an adequate notion of those qualities, which made a deeper impression on others as well as

myself than any of the characteristics I have noticed. . . . I have never known a heart so open to the claims of distress, and with him misery was a sufficient claim when his help was asked. The turn he gave the matter was that he was the party obliged, not the asker of the favour. If any one was depressed by fortune below those who would have otherwise been his equal, Hamilton was sure, by the most deliate means, to make him as far as pos-ible forget what was painful in his position. Hamilton, as far as I can recollect, was not wanting in the performance of any of the duties which society expects from all its members, but he did not rest there. On many occasions he seemed to me to love his neighbour better than himself." Mr. Traill's reminiscences contain some interesting additional particulars. He says:— "At the period of my entrance at Balliol, Hamilton was in the second year of his residence. His habits of study were then confirmed, though somewhat irregular. His manner of reading was characteristic. He had his table, chairs, and generally his floor, strewed with books; and you might find him in the midst of this confusion studying with his foot on a chair, pising one great folio on his knee, with another open in his hand. His mode of 'tearing out the entrails' of a book, as he termed it, was remarkable. A perusal of the preface, table of contents, and index, and a glance at those parts which were new to him (which were few), were all that was necessary. It was by this facility in acquiring knowledge, and his great faculty in retaining it, that he was able, in the short period of his undergraduateship, to become the most learned Aristotelian in Oxford. In addition to the usual Oxford course of the Ethics, Rhetoric, and Poetics, and the Politics and Economics, he had studied the analytical, physical, and metaphysical treatises; and the History of Animals, and had consulted all the principal commentators. His reputation as an Aristotelian collected a large audience in the schools at his examination. Few of them were capable of estimating the amount of his learning; and, to judge from their style of examination, the examining masters themselves seemed to feel his superiority. Still his examination, in the Oxford sense of the word, was not a brilliant one. Though a sound and even learned scholar, his was not the kind of scholarship that told in an Oxford examination. His early education in Scotland had not been fashioned after the model of an English public school. He wrote Latin prose with ease and correctness, but he was not in the practice of verse-writing-not that he was without a thorough knowledge of metres and of the niceties of the languages. Taken altogether, his examination, both for scholarship and science, has never been surpassed. His reading was not confined to the ordinary College course; it embraced also the learning of the period of the Reformation, and of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. His attention was at this period turned to medicine as a profession, and the early writers on this branch of science formed part of his study. We may well be surprised when we

| consider this amount of labour, and remember that it was the spontaneous and unassisted effort of his own mind.... It was a dangerous affair accompanying Hamilton to an old book-shop. He was sure to persuade you to buy some favourite folio, and as soon as you had got it he would comfort you with the assurance that you would not understand a word of it. His own collection was of the most miscellaneous nature. In addition to every commentator upon Aristotle, it included the learned squabbles of the Scaligers, Scioppius, and the authors of the Epistolæ Obscurorum Virorum. He was fond of controversial writings, and enjoyed the learned railings of the Scioppian style.

"Any account of Hamilton's Oxford life would be defective that did not notice him in his hours of relaxation, which were equally characteristic of the inan. Whatever he did, whether work or play, was done with his whole heart and soul. He had no turn for hunting, shooting, or boating, the usual outdoor studies of Oxford; nor would they have furnished the sort of relaxation he required. Gymnastics, as now scientifically practised, would have been exactly the thing for him, and he wou'd have excelled as a gymnast. We were obliged to content ourselves with the simple feats of leaping, vaulting, and the use of the pole. In these our proficiency was by no means contemptible. When tired with work, we started off, pole in hand, to Port Meadow or Bagley Wood, or took a round of the fields and lanes (our home preserves), clearing the gates and fences as we went. On these occasions, to relieve the severity of his study, Hamilton was in the habit of reciting, in his ore rotundo manner, passages from favourite authors. The last lines of the Prometheus of Eschylus, the beginning of the second book of Lucretius, and the concluding sentences of Tacitus's Life of Agricola, were amongst his favourites. Sometimes he would repeat the same line over and over again, when it was sonorous and filled the ear. One of these lines I remember, and mention it as now so applicable to himself. It was from Cowley's lines to Hobbes, in which he addresses him

as

Thou great Columbus of the golden lands of new philoso phies.'"

Mr. Traill gives some amusing illustrations of Hamilton's love of fun, and adds, to his honour, that he never knew him to be troubled by a dun, or to have been intoxicated, all the time he was at Oxford,—in those days a rare exhibition of virtue. He concludes by saying that he never knew a man who had "less of the dross of mere human nature." There was probably some exaggera tion, in the course of tradition, of the number of books "professed" by Hamilton at his final examination for his degree, but the evidence of Mr. Villers of Balliol, who was present on the occasion, may be regarded as unexIn his testimonial ceptionably authentic. to Sir William, when a candidate for the Moral Philosophy Chair, he stated :—

"In the department of science, his examination stood, and, I believe, still stands, alone; and it certainly argued no common enthusiasm and ability for philosophical pursuits, that in a university like Oxford, where the ancient philosophers are the peculiar objects of study and admiration, and the surest passports to academical distinction, his examination should not only remain unequalled for the number, but likewise for the difficulty, of the authors. Besides other subjects less iminediately connected with a professorship of morals, it contained every original work of antiquity, difficult or important, on logic, on the philosophy of the human mind, on ethics, politics, and other branches of practical philosophy, on rhetoric and poetical criticism; and after a trial of many hours, besides the honours of the University, he received the thanks and the public acknowledgment of the examiners, that he had never been surpassed either in the minute or the comprehensive knowledge of the systems on which he had been examined."

Mr. Villers added, that in fourteen of his books on the abstruser subjects of Greek philosophy he was not examined, "the greater part of these being declared by the masters to be too purely metaphysical for public examination." Hamilton was at this time in his twenty-second year. How he felt himself on the occasion we gather from a letter of Lockhart's to his father, in which he says, "Hamilton is going up for his examination to-morrow. I daresay he will make a fine figure; but in the meantime he is sadly 'funcked' as they all call it." The examination extended over two days, occupying twelve hours, and at the close Hamilton wrote to his mother, "This morning I received your pleasing letter, which gave me the happiness to hear that Tom was well. I was just going to the schools when I received it, and am not plucked."

It now became necessary for him to determine his future career. His thoughts had apparently been gradually diverted from Medicine to Law. He had found anatomy sufficiently interesting as a scientific pursuit, but so far as the practice of medicine was concerned, he had probably already come to the conclusion, which he expressed with a freedom so offensive to the profession, in one of his Edinburgh Review papers (1832), that it had not made "a single step since Hippocrates," and that the precept of Hoffmann embodied true wisdom, "Fuge medicos, et eorum medicamenta, si vis esse salvus." The advice of Mr. Scott of Benholme, whose son Alexander was his dearest friend, appears to have had considerable influence in deciding him to study for the Scottish Bar. Having speedily fixed his choice, he returned to Scotland, and in July 1813 passed as advocate.

His time for the first three years after

passing was occupied to a large extent in researches connected with his family history, in which he had the assistance of the learned antiquarian Mr. John Riddell. The result was that in 1816 he was duly adjudged heirmale in general to Sir Robert Hamilton of Preston, the head of that house, who died in 1701, and declared entitled henceforth to bear the name and style of "Baronet of Preston and Fingalton." Of these nominal possessions the only fragment that came into his hands was acquired by purchase in 1819. It consists of a small plot of ground, now occupied as an orchard, in the midst of which, visible to the traveller as he passes the village of Prestonpans, there rises, with some dignity, in spite of decay, a square and massy tower, whose roofless walls and ruined battlements are redeemed from austerity by a kindly growth of long grass, clasping shrubs, and fragrant wallflower. This is all that remains of territorial estate to the house of Preston, the eldest of the junior branches of the line of Hamilton. Mr. Veitch gives an interesting sketch of the family history and its more eminent representatives, from the time of Robert the Bruce to that of Sir Robert aforesaid. They were a stout race, and played no unworthy part in the history of Scotland. In the cause of civil and religious liberty, and equally in devotion to the Crown, they distinguished themselves, in successive generations, by indomitable firmness and generous self-sacrifice, ending in the total waste of their once wide possessions. One, Sir David, a leader of the Scottish Reformation, suffered attainder for his loyalty to Queen Mary, whose banner he followed at Langside. Another, Sir John, one of the Lords of the Articles, maintained an uncompromising opposition to the aggressions of the Crown in the reigns of the first James and Charles. His son, Sir Thomas, at once a Covenanter and a Cavalier, fought against Cromwell at Dunbar and Worcester. With his son, Sir Robert, the title and the historical fame of the house passed away together, till both were revived in the person of Sir William. As the recognised and trusted head of the Covenanters, Sir Robert led them to victory at Drumelog and defeat at Bothwell Bridge. He appears to have embodied in excess the unyielding firmness of his race and the intense religious convictions and fervour of his party. His intolerant zeal and want of wisdom may, however, be now forgiven, in remembrance of the sufferings which drove him and his followers into revolt against a wicked government, of his unflinching valour, and his stern though unenlightened honesty.

The natural impulses that led Sir Wil-pretation of an Act of Sederunt regulating liam to connect himself, "by a species of the lodging of papers, with as much fire and formal service," with a family history so full vehemence as if the most sacred interests of stirring and congenial associations, are were at stake. Apart from these constituwell touched upon by his biographer. With tional obstacles to his success, it must not be all his independence and love of freedom, lost sight of that the very things for which he had an intense reverence for the past, he was most distinguished were rather deand, both in the sphere of intellectual and terrent than attractive to the general run of political history, turned with an eye of of those on whose favour an advocate has to sympathy and admiration to the mighty men depend for employment. The average of other days. Nor is it mere fancy that "agent," like the average of mankind, has a traces in his own character the same boldly natural distrust in business matters of anymarked lineaments that figure in the history thing approaching to genius, and there can of his ancestors, and recognises in his scarcely be a more dangerous reputation trenchant polemics the swing of " the sword- with which to come to the Bar than that arm that charged at Drumclog." of literary tendencies, and devotion to any books or studies, except those which instruct a man how to prevail against his adversary in foro contentioso. This seems an absurd and even cruel prejudice. But Themis is a stern and jealous goddess; those at least who minister at her gates require exclusive devotion of the postulants for the honour of serving at her altars. Lord Jeffrey is almost the only example of a literary man who succeeded in obtaining a large practice at the Scottish Bar. Though, therefore, Sir William possessed all the capacity necessary for becoming a great lawyer, and might, with adventitious circumstances to favour him, have risen high in his profession, it is no matter of wonder that his career at the Bar, though by no means quite a failure, was far from being a great success.

Soon after coming to the Bar Sir William writes to his mother: "I have had my time sadly consumed in pacing these vile Parliament House boards-nothing to do which I am not sorry at in the present state of my legal acquirements." This experience did not undergo much variation for some time. He took due pains, indeed, after passing, to increase his legal knowledge, and in that respect, not less than in mental capacity, it cannot be doubted that his qualifications as an advocate, especially in times when written pleadings were largely used, were greatly above the average. In Civil Law, the foundation of Scottish jurisprudence, he might probably, in comparison with the common standard, be considered learned. Neither was he by any means briefless. He spoke himself of his practice as having been in 1820, for his standing, "highly prosperous." Some of his written arguments still survive to attest the care, ingenuity, and force which he could bring to bear on a question of law. It cannot be denied, however, that he lacked some of the qualities which are essential to success at the Bar. He was never a fluent speaker; as a boy he hated public display of the art of speech. His fondness for minute distinction, and his severe accuracy, were qualities which might be considered valuable to an advocate. But they are not always so, especially when joined, as in him, to excessive fastidiousness and elaboration in the working up of his materials, resulting in inconvenient delay. The successful making up of "records" and "pleas in law" does not necessarily imply high artistic talent, and rough expedition is generally more valued than more perfect but tardy work. Nor was it even to be expected that the recondite scholar and silent thinker, however fit for conducting a high legal argument, should ever have become proficient in the valuable art of contending before a Lord Ordinary about a small question of expenses, or the inter

Next to the possession of the practical qualities which secure success in that profession, political connexion has always been a valuable aid to advancement; in some cases, indeed, it has been found to compensate for the absence of any other special claim to recognition. But in this respect also Sir William was doomed to comparative neglect. Politically he was a Whig, a stanch and honest one, and though not a demonstrative politician, and in his earlier years at the Bar associated most intimately with men of the opposite party, he did not hesitate to profess that faith during the long years when such profession implied absolute exclusion from any public appointment within the sphere of Government influence. But the gradual progress and triumph of the opinions with which he had identified himself brought him little advantage; the only recognition he ever received from his political friends being the appointment to the poor office of Solicitor of Teinds in 1832. The cause of this is as easily explained as his want of success at the Bar. Though a firm and faithful adherent, and the representative of a family which had suffered the

« ZurückWeiter »