« ZurückWeiter »
volumes that came out fince Dr. Hawkefworth's edition, not to look on them as a tax levied on the publick (which I think one might without injustice;) contain no more than sufficient to have made one of real value; and there is a kind of disingenuity, not to give it a harfher title, in exhibiting what the author never meant should see the light; for no motive, but a fordid onė, can betray the survivers to make that publick, which they themselves must be of opinion will be unfavourable to the memory of the dead.
Life does not often receive good unmixed with evil. The benefits of the art of printing are depraved by the facility with which fcandal may be diffused, and secrets revealed; and by the temptation by which traffick solicies avarice to betray the weaknesses of passion, or the confidence of friendfhip.
I cannot forbear to think these posthumous publications injurious to fociety. A man conscious of literary reputation will grow in time afraid to write with tenderness to his fifter, or with fondness to his child; or to remit on the flightest occasion, or most pressing exigence, the rigour of critical choice, and grammatical severity:
That esteem which preserves his letters, will at last produce his disgrace, when that which he wrote to his friend or his daughter shall be laid open to the publick.
There is perhaps fufficient evidence, that most of the plays in question unequal as they may be to the rest, were written by Shakspeare; but the
4 Volumes XIII. XIV. XV. and XVI. in large 8vo. Nine more have lince been added, REED.
reason generally given for publishing the less correct pieces of an author, that it affords a more impartial view of a man's talents or way of thinking, then when we only see him in form, and prepared for our reception, is not enough to condemn an editor who thinks and practices otherwise. For what is all this to fhow, but that every man is more dull at one time than another? fact which the world would easily have admitted; without asking any proofs in its support that might be destructive to an author's reputation.
To conclude ; if the work, which this publication was meant to facilitate, has been already performed, the fatisfaction of knowing it to be so may be obtained from hence; if otherwise, let those who raised expectations of corre&ness, and through negligence defeated them, be justly exposed by future editors, who will now be in possession of by far the greatest part of what they might have enquired after for years to no purpose; for in respect of such a number of the old quartos as are here exhibited, the first folio is a common book. This advantage will - at least arise, that future editors, having equally recourse to the fame copies, can challenge distinction and preference only by genius, capacity, industry, and learning,
As I have only collected materials for future artists, I consider what I have been doing as no more than an apparatus for their use.
if the publick is inclined to receive it as such, I am amply rewarded for my trouble; if otherwise, I shall submit with cheerfulness to the censure which should equitably fall on an injudicious attempt; having this confolation, however, that my design
amounted to no more than a wish to encourage others to think of preserving the oldest editions of the English writers, which are growing scarcer every day; and to afford the world all the affistance or pleasure it can receive from the most authentick copies extant of its NOBLEST POET.
INTRODUCTION, It is
Tis faid of the ostrich, thai she drops her egg at random, to be difpos'd of as chance pleases; either brought to maturity by the sun's kindly warmth, or else crush'd by beasts and the feet of passers-by: such, at least, is the account which naturalists have given us of this extraordinary bird; and admitting it for a truth, she is in this a fit emblem of almost every great genius: they conceive and produce with ease those noble issues of human understanding; but incubation the
5. As the foregoing Advertisement appeared when its author was young and uninformed, he cannot now abide by many sentiments expressed in it: nor would it have been here reprinted, but in compliance with Dr. Johnson's injunce tion, that all the relative Prefaces should continue to attend his edition of our author's plays. STEEVENS.
dull work of putting them correctly upon paper and afterwards publishing, is a task they can nog away with. If the original state of all such authors writings, even from Homer downward, could be enquir'd into and known, they would yield proof in abundance of the justness of what is here afferted: but the author now before us shall fuffice for them all; being at once the greatest instance of geo nius in producing noble things, and of negligence in providing for them afterwards. This négligence indeed was so great, and the condition in which his works are come down to us fo .very deformid, that it has, of late years, induc'd several gentlemen to make a revision of them: but the publick seems pot to be fatisfy'd with any of their endeavours; and the reason of it's discontent will be manifest, when the state of his old editions, and the methods that they have taken to amend them, are fully lay'd opon, which is the first business of this Introdụdion.
of thirty- fix plays which Shakspeare has left us, and which compose the collection that was afterwards set out in folio, thirteen only were publifh'd in his life-time, that have much resemblance to those in the folio; these thirteen are --" Hamlet, First and second Henry the IV. King Lear, Love's Labour's Lost, Merchant of Venice, Midsummer Night's Dream, Much Ado about Nothing, Richard II. and III. Romeo and Juliet, Titus Andronicus, and Troilus and Crefrida.” Some others, that came out in the same period, bear indeed the titles of —-" Henry'V. King John, Merry Wives of Windfor, and Taming of the Shrew;" but are no other than either first
6. This is meant of the first quarto edition of the Taming of the Shrew; for the second was printed from the folio. But
draughts, or mutilated and perhaps surreptitious impressions of those plays, but whether of the two is not easy to determine: King John is certainly a first draught, and in two parts; and so much another play, that only one line of it is retain'd in the second: there is also a first draught of the Second and Third Parts of Henry VI. published in his life-time under the following title, -" The whole Contention betweene the two famous Houses, Lancaster and York:” and to these plays, fix in pumber, may be added--the first impression of Romeo and Juliet, being a play of the same stamp: The date of all these quarto's, and that of their several reimpressions, may be seen in a table that follows the Introduction. Othello came out only one year before the folio; and is, in the main, the same play that we have there: and this too is the case of the first-mentioned thirteen; notwithstanding there are in many of them great variations, and particularly, in Hamlet, King Lear, Richard III. and Romeo and Juliet.
As for the plays, which, we say, are either the poet's first draughts, or elfe imperfect and stolen copies, it will be thought, perhaps, they might as well have been left out of the account; but they
the play in this first edition appears certainly to have been a fpurious one, from Mr. Pope's account of it, who seems to have been the only editor whom it was ever seen by: great pains has been taken to trace who he had it of, (for it was pot in his collection) but without success.
[Mr. Capell afterwards procured a fight of this defideratum, a circumstance which he has quaintly recorded in a note anpexed to the MS. catalogue of his Shaksperiana: "-lent by Mr. Malone, an Irish gentleman, living in Queen Ann Street East.?'] STEEVENS,