Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

circumstances that attended the death of our great poet, From the 34th page of this book, which contains an account of a diforder under which his daughter Elizabeth laboured (about the year 1624,) and of the method of cure, it appears, that he was his only daughter; (Elizabeth Hall, filia mea unica, tortura oris defædata.) In the beginning of April in that year fhe vifited London, and returned to Stratford on the 22d; an enterprife at that time of great pith and

[merged small][ocr errors]

While we lament that our incomparable poet was fnatched from the world at a time when his faculties were in their full

vigour, and before he was ‹ declined into the vale of years, › let us be thankful that this fweetest child of Fancy, did not perifh while he yet lay in the cradle. He was born at Stratfordupon-Avon in April 1564; and I have this moment learned from the Register of that town that the plague broke out there on the 30th of the following June, and raged with fuch violence between that day and the laft day of December, that two hundred and thirty-eight perfons were in that period carried to the grave, of which number probably 216 died of that malignant diftemper; and one only of the whole number refided, not in Stratford, but in the neighbouring town of Welcombe. From the 237 inhabitants of Stratford, whofe names appear in the Regifter, twenty-one are to be fubducted, who, it may be prefumed, would have died in fix months, in the ordinary courie of nature; for in the five preceding years, reckoning, according to the style of that time, from March 25, 1559, to March 25, 1564, two hundred and twentyone perfons were buried at Stratford, of whom 210 were townfmen: that is, of thefe latter 42 died each year, at an average. Suppofing one in thirty-five to have died annually, the total number of the inhabitants of Stratford at that period was 1470; and confequently the plague in the laft fix months of the year 1564 carried off more than a feventh part of them, Fortunately for mankind it did not reach the house in which the infant Shakspeare lay, for not one of that name appears in the dead lift, May we fuppofe, that, like Horace, he lay fecure and fearlefs in the midft of contagion and death, protected by the Mufes to whom his future life was to be devoted, and covered over

[ocr errors]

facra

Lauroque, collataque myrto,

Non fine Diis animofas infans. MALONE..

2

where a monument is placed in the wall.) He is reprefented under an arch, in a fitting pofture, a cushion fpread before him, with a pen in his right-hand, and his left refted on a fcroll of paper. The following Latin diftich is engraved under the cushion :

Judicio Pylium, genio Socratem, arte Maronem,

THEOBALD.

Terra tegit, populus mæret, Olympus habet. The first fyllable in Socratem is here made fhort, which cannot be allowed. Perhaps we should read Sophoclem. Shakspeare is then appofitely compared with a dramatick author among the ancients: but ftill it fhould be remembered that the elogium is leffened while the metre is reformed; and it is well known that fome of our early writers of Latin poetry were uncom→ monly negligent in their profody, efpecially in proper names. The thought of this diftich, as Mr. Tollet obferves, might have been taken from The Faëry Queene of Spenfer, B. II. c. ix. ft. 48, and c. x. ft. 3.

To this Latin infcription on Shakspeare fhould be added the lines which are found underneath it on his monument: Stay, paffenger, why doft thou go so fast?

Read, if thou canft, whom envious death hath plac'd
Within this monument; Shakspeare, with whom
Quick nature dy'd; whofe name doth deck the tomb
Far more than coft; fince all that he hath writ

Leaves living art but page to ferve his wit.

Obiit An°. Di. 1616.

æt. 53, die 23 Apri. STEEVENS.

It appears from the Verfes of Leonard Digges that our author's monument was erected before the year 1623. It has been engraved by Vertue, and done in Mezzotinto by Miller.

A writer in The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. XXIX. p. 267, fays, there is as ftrong a refemblance between the buft at Stratford, and the portrait of our author prefixed to the first folio edition of his plays, as can well be between a ftatue and a picture.,, To me (and I have viewed it feveral times with a good deal of attention) it appeared in a very different light. When I went laft to Stratford, I carried with me the only genuine prints of Shakspeare that were then extant, and I could not trace any refemblance between them and this figure. There is a pertnefs in the countenance of the latter totally differing from that placid compofure and thoughtful gravity, fo perceptible in his original portrait and his beft prints. Our poet's monument having been erected by his fon-in-law Dr.

Hall, the ftatuary probably had the affiftance of fome picture, and failed only from want of fkill to copy it.

Mr. Granger obferves, (Biog. Hift. Vol. I. p. 259,) that it has been faid there never was an original portrait of Shakfpeare, but that Sir Thomas Clarges after his death caufed a portrait to be drawn for him from a perfon who nearly refembled him.", This entertaining writer was a great collector of anecdotes, but not always very fcrupulous in inquiring into the authenticity of the information which he procured; for this improbable tale, I find, on examination, ftands only on the affertion of an anonymous writer in The Gentleman's Magazine for Auguft 1759, who boldly affirmed it as an abfolute fact; but being afterwards publickly called upon to produce his authority, never produced any. There is the ftrongest reafon therefore to prefume it a forgery.

66

Mr. Walpole, (adds Mr. Granger) informs me, that the only original picture of Shakspeare is that which belonged to Mr. Keck, from whom it pafled to Mr. Nicoll, whofe only daughter married the Marquis of Caernarvon, (now duke of Chandos).

From this picture, his Grace, at my requeft, very obli gingly permitted a drawing to be made by that excellent artist Mr. Ozias Humphry; and from that drawing the print prefixed to the prefent edition has been engraved.

66

In the manufcript notes of the late Mr. Oldys, this portrait is faid to have been painted by old Cornelius Janfen. Others," he adds, fay, that it was done by Richard Burbage the player;,, and in another place he afcribes it to

66

John Taylor, the player. This Taylor, it is faid in The Critical Review for 1770, left it by will to Sir William D'Avenant. But unluckily there was no player of the chriftian and furname of John Taylor, contemporary with Shakspeare. The player who performed in Shakspeare's company, was Jofeph Taylor. There was however a painter of the name of John Taylor, to whom in his early youth it is barely poffible that we may have been indebted for the only original portrait of our author; for in the Picture-Gallery at Oxford are two portraits of Taylor the Water-poet, and on each of them John Taylor pinx, 1655. There appears fome refemblance of manner between these portraits and the picture of Shakspeare in the duke of Chando's collection. That picture (I exprefs the opinion of Sir Joshua Reynold's) has not the leaft air of Cornelius Janfen's performances.

66

That this picture was once in the poffeffion of Sir William

D'Avenant is highly probable; but it is much more likely to have been purchafed by him from fome of the players after the theatres were fhut up by authority, and the veterans of the ftage were reduced to great diftrefs, than to have been bequeathed to him by the perfon who painted it; in whofe cuftody it is improbable that it fhould have remained. Sir William D'Avenant appears to have died infolvent. There is no Will of his in the Prerogative-Office; but adminiftration of his effects was granted to John Otway, his principal creditor, in May 1668. After his death, Betterton the actor bought it, probably at a publick fale of his effects. While it was in Betterton's poffeffion, it was engraved by Vandergucht, for Mr. Rowe's edition of Shakspeare, in 1709. Betterton made no will, and died very indigent. He had a large collection of portraits of actors in crayons, which were bought at the fale of his goods by Bullfinch the Printfeller, who fold them to one Mr. Sykes. The portrait of Shakspeare was purchafed by Mrs. Barry the act refs, who fold it afterwards for 40 guineas to Mr. Robert Keck. In 1719, while it was in Mr. Keck's poffeffion, an engraving was made from it by Vertue: a large half-fheet. Mr. Nicoll of Colney-Hatch, Middlefex, maxrying the heirefs of the Keck family, this picture devolved to him; and while in his poffeffion, it was, in 1747, engraved by Houbraken for Birch's Illuftrious Heads. By the marriage of the duke of Chandos with the daughter of Mr. Nicoll, it became his Grace's property.

Sir Godfrey Kneller painted a picture of our author, which he prefented to Dryden, but from what picture he copied, I am unable to ascertain, as I have never feen Kneller's picture. The poet repayed him by an elegant copy of Verfes. See his Poems, Vol. II. p. 231, edit. 1743.

[ocr errors]

Shakspeare, thy gift, I place before my fight,
"With awe I afk his bleffing as I write;

"With reverence look on his majestick face,
"Proud to be lefs, but of his godlike race.

"His foul infpires me, while thy praise I write,

"And I like Teucer under Ajax fight:

-

Bids thee, through me, be bold; with dauntless breaft "Contemn the bad, and emulate the best:

"Like his, thy criticks in the attempt are loft,

"When most they rail, know then, they envy most."

It appears from a circumitance mentioned by Dryden, that thefe verfes were written after the year 1683: probably after Rhymer's book had appeared in 1693. Dryden having made. no will, and his wife Lady Elizabeth renouncing, adminiftra

tion was granted on the 10th of June 1700, to his fon Charles, who was drowned in the Thames near Windfor in 1704. His younger brother Erafmus fucceeded to the title of Baronet, and died without ifiue in 1711; but I know not what became of his effects, or where this picture is now to be found.

About the year 17 28 a mezzotinto of Shakspeare was fcraped. by Simon, faid to be done from an original picture painted by Zouft or Soeft, then in the poffeffion of T. Wright, painter, in Covent-Garden. The earliest known picture painted by Zouft in England, was done in 1657; fo that if he ever painted a picture of Shakspeare, it must have been a copy. It could not however have been made from D'Avenant's picture, (unless the painter took very great liberties) for the whole air, drefs, difpofition of the hair, &c. are different. I have lately feen a picture in the poffeffion of-Douglas. Efq. at Teddington near Twickenham, which is, I believe, the very picture from which Simon's Mezzotinto was made. It is on canvas, (about 24 inches by 20,) and fomewhat fmaller than the life.

The earlieft print of our poet that appeared, is that in the title-page of the firft folio edition of his works, 1623, engraved by Martin Droefhout. On this print the following lines, addreffed TO THE READER, Were written by Ben Jonfon; "This figure that thou here fecft put,

"It was for gentle Shakspeare cut;
"Wherein the graver had a ftrife

With nature, to out-do the life.
"O, could he but have drawn his wit
As well in brafs, as he hath hit
His face, the print would then surpass
"All that was ever writ in brafs !

But fince he cannot, reader, look
"Not on his picture, but his look."

Droefhout engraved alfo the heads of John Fox the martyrologift, Montjoy Blount, fon of Charles Blount Earl of Devonfhire, William Fairfax who fell at the fiege of Frankendale in 1621, and John Howfon, Bishop of Durham. The portrait of Bishop Howfon is at Chrift-church, Oxford. By comparing any of thefe prints (the two latter which are well executed) with the original pictures from whence the engravings were made, a better judgment might be formed of the fidelity of our author's portrait, as exhibited by this engraver, than from Jonfon's affertion, that "in this figure

[ocr errors]

the graver had a strife

"With nature, to out-do the life;"

« ZurückWeiter »