Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

POETRY.-Albert Pike described by Himself, 434. "Old Stars," 434. Morning, 478. Pere La Chaise, 479. The Last Day of October, 1862, 479. A Drifting Leaf, 479. Hope, 479. Harben's Love Song, 480.

66

SHORT ARTICLES.-Frogs in Coal, 449. Devotion to Science, 449. General Liprandi, 462. Cockney Criticism, 480. How to see the Exhibition in Ten Minutes, 480. News from the Styx," 480. A smooth Way of getting out of it, 480. Forgiveness of Injuries, 480.

PUBLISHED EVERY SATURDAY BY

LITTELL, SON, & CO., BOSTON.

For Six Dollars a year, in advance, remitted directly to the Publishers, the LIVING AGE will be punctually forwarded free of postage.

Complete sets of the First Series, in thirty-six volumes, and of the Second Series, in twenty volumes, handsomely bound, packed in neat boxes, and delivered in all the principal cities, free of expense of freight, are for sale at two dollars a volume.

ANY VOLUME may be had separately, at two dollars, bound, or a dollar and a half in numbers.

ANY NUMBER may be had for 13 cents; and it is well worth while for subscribers or purchasers to complete any broken volumes they may have, and thus greatly enhance their value.

ALBERT PIKE DESCRIBED BY HIMSELF.

General Albert Pike of Arkansas was once a loyal man. What he is now is forcibly told in the following verses written by loyal Albert Pike, and printed in a volume gathered some years ago for private distribution among his friends. One of those friends, a loyal man, sends it to be printed in the Evening Post.

DISUNION.

AY, shout! 'Tis the day of your pride,

Ye despots and tyrants of earth!
Tell your serfs the American name to deride,
And to rattle their fetters in mirth.
Ay, shout! for the league of the free

Is about to be shivered to dust,

And the rent limbs to fall from the vigorous tree, Wherever Liberty put her firm trust.

Shout! shout! for more firmly established will be Your thrones and dominions beyond the blue sea.

Laugh on! for such folly supreme

The world had yet never beheld;
And ages to come will the history deem
A tale by antiquity swelled:

For nothing that Time has upbuilt
And set in the annals of crime,

So stupid and senseless, so wretched in guilt,
Darkens sober tradition or rhyme.

It will be, like the fable of Eblis's fall,
A by word of mocking and horror to all.

Ye mad, who would raze out your name
From the league of the proud and the free,
And a pitiful separate sovereignty claim,

Like a lone wave flung off from the sea;
Oh, pause ere you plunge in the chasm

That yawns in your traitorous way! Ere Freedom, convulsed with one terrible spasm, Desert you forever and aye!

Pause! think! ere the earthquake astonish your soul,

And the thunders of war through your green valleys roll!

Good God! what a title, what name

Will history give to your crime!
In the deepest abyss of dishonor and shame,
Ye will writhe till the last hour of time,
As braggarts who forged their own chains,

Pulled down what their brave fathers built, And tainted the blood in their children's young veins

With the poison of slavery and guilt; And Freedom's bright heart be hereafter tenfold, For your folly and fall, more discouraged and cold.

What flag shall float over the fires

And the smoke of your patricide war,

Instead of the stars and broad stripes of your

sires?

A lone, pale, dim, flickering star, With a thunder-cloud veiling its glow As it faints away into the sea ;

Will the Eagle's wing shelter and shield you? Ah, no!

His wing shelters only the free. Miscall it, disguise it, boast, rant as you will, You arc traitors, misled by your mad leaders still.

Turn, turn then! Cast down in your might
The pilots that sit at the helm;
Steer, steer your proud ship from the gulf which
dark night

And treason and fear overwhelm !

Turn back! From your mountains and glens, From forest and precipice, cavern and den, From your swamps, from the rivers and sea,

Where your brave fathers bled to be free, From the graves where those glorious patriots le Re-echoes the warning, "Turn back, or ye die !"

1834.

"OLD STARS."

"Hung be the Heavens with black."

I.

His mighty life was burned away
By Carolina's fiery sun;

The pestilence that walks by day
Smote him before his course seemed run.

II.

The Constellations of the sky,

The Pleiades, the Southern Cross, Looked sadly down to see him die, To see a nation weep his loss.

III.

"Send him to us," the stars might cry"You do not feel his worth below;

Your petty great men do not try
The measure of his mind to know.

IV.

"Send him to us. This is his place,
Not 'mid your puny jealousies;
You sacrificed him in your race
Of envies, strifes, and policies.

V.

"His eye could pierce our vast expanse, His ear could hear our morning songs, His mind, amid our mystic dance,

Could follow all our myriad throngs.

VI.

"Send him to us! no martyr's soul, No hero slain in righteous wars, No raptured saint could e'er control A holier welcome from the stars."

VII.

Take him, ye stars! take him on high,
To your vast realms of boundless space,
But once he turned from you to try

His name on martial scrolls to trace.

VIII.

That once was when his country's call
Said danger to her flag was nigh,
And then her banner's stars dimmed all
The radiant lights which gemmed the sky.

IX.

Take him, loved orbs! His country's life,
Freedom for all-for these he wars;
For these he welcomed bloody strife,

And followed in the wake of Mars!

* General Mitchell was familiarly known by the soldiers of his command under the sobriquet of "Old Stars."

-N. Y. Evening Post.

....

66

From The Quarterly Review. diminution of lawful authority in matters AIDS TO FAITH. spiritual. This was probably inevitable. [CONTINUED FROM NO. 965.] The isolated spirituality could not balance WE enter now upon a different branch of properly the great and neighboring weight of our subject. When we first drew attention the temporal power. The evil was increased to this subject we expressed an opinion ac- by the unavoidable mixture of questions of cordant with that which the Bishop of Ox- property with questions directly spiritual ford has stated in his preface to the "Re-through our system of endowments; and the plies to the Essayists." "Two distinct ever-growing jealousy of the law of England courses," he says, seem to be required as to freehold rights raised the danger to its the distinct, solemn, and, if need be, highest point. Soon after the Reformation atsevere decision of authority, that assertions tempts were made to remedy the evil. The such as these cannot be put forward as pos- abortive "Reformatio Legum" stands as an sibly true.... by honest men who are abiding record of such an effort. All such enbound by voluntary obligations to teach the deavors as these were utterly swept away by Christian revelation as the truth of God. the great flood of Puritan violence which soon . . . . Secondly, we need the calm, compre- afterwards broke forth upon the land. Nor hensive, and scholar-like declaration of pos- was the period of the Restoration in any way itive truth upon all the matters in dispute, favorable for the development of a well-conby which the shallowness and the passion sidered and impartial strengthening of the and the ignorance of the new system of un- spiritual authority of the Church. It was belief may be thoroughly displayed."* pre-eminently a time of reaction; and a reactionary time, full as it necessarily is of spasms and violence, is most unfavorable for the formation of those joints and bands of reasonable restraint which form the truest

irritation bred by the action of that spiritual revolution on the possession of endowments. There was first the remembrance of the many grievous wrongs which had been wrought in the ejection from their benefices of the best of the clergy, under the falsest professions, in order to install into them the ignorant and fanatical self-seekers of the Puritan predominance; and then there was next the natu ral but unhappy action of the spirit of retribution running into revenge, righting freely these past wrongs by new ejections. All this acted mischievously upon the mind of the Church, and made the question of the restoration of her civil rights, for which she had mainly to lean on the civil arm, rather than the maintenance of her doctrinal purity, the great object upon which her eye was fixed.

We have traced the discharge by several writers of the second of these duties. We now pass on to examine what has been done by authority to free the Church of England from any complicity in the strange and erroneous doc-protection of liberty itself. There was the trines of the essayists. Constituted as that body is, it is impossible that there should, under any circumstances, be within its pale the sharp, sudden acting of authority which may be found in other communions or in other lands. All our traditions are in favor of liberty; all are hostile to the authoritative repression of independent action, and still more, we thank God, of independent thought. Even when we were a part of that vast organic body, half spiritual, half civil, of which the Papacy was the head, the action of authority in all matters spiritual was feebler and more tardy in this land than in any other. Many were the concessions wrung by our spirit of national independence from the distant Popedom; many the acts of rebellious freedom at which that crafty power was compelled to wink, in order to preserve any dominion over the self-willed islanders. Our separation from Rome, and the full establishment of the apostolic freedom of our own Church from the usurpations of the see which had transformed a lawful primacy into a lawless tyranny, were accompanied an evil waiting as the inseparable shadow upon our many blessings-with a

Preface to "Replies," etc., pp. 9, 10.

This was not all. The temper of the whole nation was one of reaction in favor of authority. Churchmen who had been faithful to the crown when it was trampled in the dirt under the feet of the Independents, would naturally suffer in the highest degree from the general epidemic; and the very loyalty of the Church led to its unduly exalting the throne, for which it had so severely suffered.

The Revolution of 1688, which in so many | forth-struggling, we might almost say, into directions strengthened and enlarged our being, against the ordinary laws of ecclesiliberties, tended only, from all its compli- astical parturition, it yet manifested at once cated operations, to weaken the free action of the Church as the spirituality of the realm. Nor, as we may find occasion to show hereafter, has recent legislation had any other tendency.

the formal slavery and the real freedom of the ecclesiastical element in our mingled constitution; our essential agreement, in spite of minor differences, on all matters concerning the fundamentals of the faith; and our No reasonable man can shut his eyes to common-sense view of the foolish attempt the benefits which have resulted from the to substitute the dreamy nebulosities of usedstruggles which make up this long history. up German speculation for a simple adherThe character of the Church of England re-ence to the language of the formularies, the sembles greatly that of men who, with wills letter of the creeds, and the plain teaching and understandings naturally strong, have of the Bible. been brought up under no very fixed or defi- The effect of the publication of this docunite rules of education, and have developed ment was great and timely. The mind of in that comparative freedom of firmness, an the Church was only, perhaps, too much quiindependence, and an individuality, with eted by it, and disposed to be prematurely which more correct rules of early training contented with what had been done as suffi must have interfered. For there is in her a cient for the occasion. Amongst the parmarvellously tenacious grasp of fundamental tisans of the essayists it produced a vast truth; an intelligent consent, amidst differ- amount of indignation. By one of the warmence on details of a multitude of minds, as est and most eloquent amongst them it was to the leading articles of the faith; and ear- described as "a document which, whilst nest, common-sense religiousness, which Cambridge lay in her usual attitude of magcould probably have been bred no otherwise nificent repose, about a month after the apthan under the full and free action of her pearance of the Quarterly, startled the world; existing constitution. But it is an inevitable one without precedent, as we trust it may be correlative of these advantages that the ac- without imitation, in the English Church." tion of authority within her body, when at It was "the counterpart of the Papal excomlast it is called for, should be slow, sporadic, munication levelled against Italian freedom, and somewhat feeble. We must not, there- filled with menaces borrowed from the anfore, expect, perhaps we need not very pas- cient days of persecution," etc. All this irsionately desire, that the rise of any error ritation was but a testimony to the real within her communion should be followed at weight of the condemnation, and not less so once by the meeting of the authoritative was the curious attempt of the same writer synod, the thunder of an anathema, and the to lessen its authority by representing the lightning shaft of summary excommunica-venerable Bishop of Exeter as not having tion. All this is illustrated in the history joined with his brethren in their censure. of the "Essays and Reviews" controversy.

When, shortly after the publication of our former article, public attention had been called to the subject, and the minds of thinking men thoroughly roused to its importance, the first action of authority was the appearance of a document, bearing first or last, we believe, the signature of every bishop of the United Church, and condemning many of the propositions of the book as inconsistent with an honest subscription to her formularies. This was, in our judgment, a mode of action highly characteristic of the temper and spirit which we have attributed to the Established Church. Somewhat informal in its conception and in its putting

There is an audacity which reaches almost to pleasantry in the attempt of the reviewer to claim the present Bishop of Exeter as one who, when the defence of the foundations of our belief was the question at issue, could conceive it to be the course of faithfulness to the duty of his great station to "protect," in the reviewer's sense of the words, “the cause of free and fair discussion from the indiscriminate violence of popular agitators."† This is really very much like expecting the great Athanasius to have deemed it his special vocation to protect the heretic Arius from the agitation and violence of the Catholic Church. But bold as this attempt would Edinburgh Review, No. 230, p. 469. † Ibid.

have been in any one who knew only the | of public, notorious, proclaimed complicity principles and character of the Right Rev. in an act which I am unwilling again to

Prelate, whose name he wished thus to coax off the bond, perhaps it might warrant even some stronger epithet when it is seen upon what the suggestion was really founded. On the 21st of February, 1861, Dr. Temple wrote, under a misconception, a letter, which he recalled the day following, to the Bishop of Exeter, inquiring with what fundamental doctrines of our Church the bishop had declared his essay to be at variance. The hasty recall of the inquiry did not save the inquirer from an answer, from which we must make one or two highly characteristic ex

[blocks in formation]

ments.

"I also avow that I hold every one of the seven persons acting together for such an object to be alike responsible for the several acts of every individual among them in executing their avowed common purpose. This judgment might, indeed, have been qualified in favor of any one of the seven who, on seeing the extravagantly vicious manner in which some of his associates had performed their part, had openly declared his disgust and abhorrence of such unfaithfulness, and had withdrawn his name from the number.

"You have not done this, although many months have elapsed since this moral poison has been publicly vended under your authority, and since the indignation of faithful Christians has openly stigmatized the work as of the most manifestly pernicious tendency; above all, as a work which all who are entrusted, as you are, with the momentous responsibility of educating the youth of a Christian nation in the knowledge and obedience of Christian faith, ought in common faithfulness and common honesty to reprobate and denounce.

"You, I repeat, have, so far as I am informed, refrained from taking any public step to vindicate your own character, and must therefore be content to bear the stigma

characterize as it deserves.

"I am, Reverend Sir,

"Rev. F. Temple.

"Your obedient servant, H. EXETER." sion, I think it right to add that, while I do "P.S.-In order to prevent misapprehennot regard your essay with the same feeling of aversion as I cannot but feel for other portions of the book, I yet deem it open to very grave remark.”

After reading these sentences, published at the close of February, it is somewhat startling to find a writer two months later endeavoring to detract from the authority of the common condemnation by the bishops through the statement that "the name of H. Exeter is now known to have been added without his knowledge and against his wish." But what will our readers say when they find, further, that the bishop had distinctly stated, in his published answer to Dr. Temple some six weeks before this was written, the following avowal ?—

[ocr errors]

"I felt constrained to accompany my concurrence in the procedure with the expression of my judgment that the paper to which I gave my assent was conceived in terms more feeble than the occasion required. I ventured to sketch a formula which I should have wished to subscribe rather than that which had been adopted, expressing the pain which we (the bishops) have felt in seeing such a book, bearing the authority of seven members of our Church; still more, of ministers of God's Word and Sacraments among us-of men specially bound, under the most solemn engagements, to faithful maintenance of the truths set forth in our Articles of Religion, in our Book of Common Prayer, and even in the Creeds of the Church Catholic. That the general tenor of this unhappy work is plainly inconsistent with fidelity to those engagements we cannot hesitate to declare. Whether the particular statements are expressed in language so cloudy or so guarded

as

to render inexpedient a more formal dealing with them either in the courts of the Church or by synodical censure, is a question which demands and is receiving our anxious consideration."

So that what the reviewer transforms into a mitigation of the sentence on his clients, viz., that "the signature H. Exeter was added without his knowledge and against his *Edinburgh Review, No. 230 (April, 1861), p. 464.

« ZurückWeiter »