tenants in common do release, and the other bring his writ of right de medietate advocationis, and recover; now I take the law to be, that because tenants in common ought to join in presentments, which cannot now be, he shall have the whole patronage: for neither can there be an apportionment that he should present all the turns, and his incumbent to have but a moiety of the profits, nor yet the act of impropriation shall 45 Ed. 3. not be defeated. But as if two tenants in common be of a ward, and they join in a writ of right of ward, and one release, the other shall recover the entire ward, because it cannot be dissevered: so shall it be in the other case, though it be of inheritance, and though he bring his action alone.

10.

41 Ed. 3.

10.

Also if a disseisor be disseised, and the mesne disseisee release to the second disseisor upon condition, and a descent be cast, and the condition broken; now the mean disseisor, whose right is revived, shall enter, notwithstanding this descent, because his right was taken away by the act of a stranger.

But if I devise land by the statute of 32 H. VIII. and the heir of the devisor enters and makes a feoffment in fee, and feoffee dieth seised, this descent binds, and there shall not be a perpetual liberty of entry, upon the reason that he never had seisin whereupon he might ground his action, but he is at mischief by his own laches: and the like law of the queen's patentee; for I see no reasonable difference between them and him in the remainder, which is Littleton's

case.

me,

But note, that the law by operation and matter in fact will never countervail and supply a title grounded upon a matter of record; and therefore if I be intitled unto a writ of error, and the land descend unto I shall never be remitted, no more shall I be unto an attaint, except I may also have a writ of right. 25 H. 8. So if upon my avowry for services, my tenant disDy. 1,7. claim where I may have a writ of right as upon disclaimer, if the land after descend to me, I shall never be remitted.

REGULA X.

Verba generalia restringuntur ad habilitatem rei vel personam.

It is a rule that the king's grants shall not be taken or construed to a special intent; it is not so with the grants of a common person, for they shall be extended as well to a foreign intent as to a common intent; but yet with this exception, that they shall never be taken to an impertinent or a repugnant intent: for all words, whether they be in deeds or statutes, or otherwise, if they be general and not express and precise, shall be restrained unto the fitness of the matter and the person.

As if I grant common in omnibus terris meis in D, Perk. pl. if I have in D. both open grounds and several, it shall 108. not be stretched to common in my several, much less in my garden or orchard.

So if I grant to a man omnes arbores meas crescentes 14 H. 8. 2. supra terras meas in D. he shall not have apple-trees, nor other fruit-trees growing in my gardens or orchards, if there be any other trees upon my grounds.

So if I grant to I. S. an annuity of 10l. a-year pro 41 Ed. 3. consilio impenso et impendendo, if I. S. be a physician, it shall be understood of his counsel in physic; and if he be a lawyer, of his counsel in law.

So if I do let a tenement to I. S. near my dwellinghouse in a borough, provided that he shall not erect nor use any shop in the same without my licence, and afterwards I licence him to erect a shop, and I. S. is then a milliner, he shall not by virtue of these general words erect a joiner's shop.

So the statute of chantries, that willeth all lands to be forfeited, that were given or employed to a superstitious use, shall not be construed of the glebe lands of parsonages: nay, farther, if lands be given to the 16 Eliz. parson and his successors of D. to say a mass in his 337. Dyer. church of D. this is out of the statute, because it shall be intended but as augmentation of his glebe; but

35 H. 6. 57, 58.

21 Ed. 3.

17.

otherwise it had been, if it had been to say a mass in another church than his own.

So the statute of wrecks, that willeth that the goods wrecked, where any live domestical creature remains in a vessel, shall be preserved and kept to the use of the owner that shall make his claim by the space of one year, doth not extend to fresh victuals or the like, which is impossible to keep without perishing or destroying it; for in these and the like cases general words may be taken, as was said, to a rare or foreign intent, but never to an unreasonable intent.

REGULA XI.

Jura sanguinis nullo jure civili dirimi possunt.

THEY be the very words of the civil law, which cannot be amended, to explain this rule, Filius est nomen naturæ, hæres est nomen juris: therefore corruption of blood taketh away the privity of the one, that is, of the heir, but not of other, that is, of the son; therefore if a man be attainted and be murdered by a stranger, the eldest son shall not have appeal, because the appeal is given to the heir, for the youngest sons who are equal in blood shall not have it; but if an attainted person be killed by his son, this is petty treason, because the privity of a son remaineth: for I admit the law to be, that if the son kill father Jus. p. 293. or mother it is petty treason, and that there remaineth in our laws so much of the ancient footsteps of potestas patris and natural obedience, which by the law of God is the very instance itself; and all other government and obedience is taken but by equity, which I add, because some have sought to weaken the law in that point.

Lamb.

Fitz. crown.

447.

So if land descend to the eldest son of a person attainted from an ancestor of the mother held in knights' service, the guardian shall enter, and oust the father, F. N. Br because the law giveth the father that prerogative in respect he is his son and heir; for of a daughter or of a special heir in tail he shall not have it: but if the son be attainted, and the father covenant in consideration

fo. 143. De Droit.

of natural love to stand seised of the land to his use, this is good enough to raise an use, because the privity of natural affection remaineth.

So if a man be attained and have charter of pardon, and be returned of a jury between his son and I. S. the challenge remaineth; so may he maintain any suit of his son, notwithstanding the blood be corrupt.

So by the statute of 21 H. VIII. the ordinary ought to commit administration of his goods that was attainted and purchase his charter of pardon, to his children, though born before the pardon, for it is no question of inheritance: for if one brother of the half blood die, the administration ought to be committed 5 Ed. 6. to his other brother of the half blood, if there be no Adm. 47. nearer by the father.

So if the uncle by the mother be attainted, pardoned, 33 H. 6.55. and land descend from the father to the son within age held in socage, the uncle shall be guardian in socage? for that savoureth so little of the privity of heir, as the possibility to inherit shutteth out.

But if a feme tenant in tail assent to the ravisher, and have no issue, and her cousin is attainted, and pardoned, and purchaseth the reversion, he shall not 5 Ed. 4. 50. enter for a forfeiture. For although the law giveth it not in point of inheritance, but only as a perquisite to any of the blood so he be next in estate; yet the recompence is understood for the stain of his blood, which cannot be considered when it is once wholly corrupted before.

So if a villain be attainted, yet the lord shall have the issues of his villain born before or after his attainder; for the lord hath them jure naturæ but as the increase of a flock.

Register,

Query, Whether if the eldest son be attainted and F. N. Br. pardoned, the lord shall have aid of his tenants to 82. G. make him knight, and it seemeth he shall; for the fol. 87. words of the writ are filium primogenitum, and not filium et hæredem, and the like writ hath pur file marrier who is no heir.

Fitz. N. B. 30.

46 Ed. 3.

21.

27 H. 8. 13.

45 Ed. 3.

REGULA XII.

Receditur a placitis juris potius, quam injuriæ et delicta maneant impunita.

THE law hath many grounds and positive learnings, which are not of the maxims and conclusions of reason; but yet are learnings received which the law hath set down and will not have called in question; these may be rather called placita juris than regulæ juris; with such maxims the law will dispense, rather than crimes and wrongs should be unpunished, quia salus populi suprema lex; and salus populi is contained in the repressing offences by pu

nishment.

Therefore if an advowson be granted to two, and the heirs of one of them, and an usurpation be had, they both shall join in a writ of right of advowson; and yet it is a ground in law, that a writ of right lieth of no less estate than of a fee-simple; but because the tenant for life hath no other several action in the law given him, and also that the jointure is not broken, and so the tenant in fee-simple cannot bring his writ of right alone; therefore rather than he should be deprived wholly of remedy, and this wrong unpunished, he shall join his companion with him, notwitstanding the feebleness of his estate.

But if lands be given to two, and to the heirs of one of them, and they lease in a præcipe by default, now they shall not join in a writ of right, because the tenant for life hath a several action, namely, a Quod ei deforciat, in which respect the jointure is broken.

So if a tenant for life and his lessor join in lease for years, and the lessee commit waste, they shall join in punishing the waste, and locus vastatus shall go to the tenant for life, and the damages to him in the reversion; and yet an action of waste lieth not for the tenant for life; but because he in the reversion cannot have it alone, because of the mean estate for life, therefore rather than the waste shall be unpunished, they shall join.

So if two coparceners be, and they lease the land, 3. 22 H. 6. and one of them die, and hath issue, and the lessee

24.