What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics: The case of innatenessMartina Penke, Anette Rosenbach John Benjamins Publishing, 06.06.2007 - 297 Seiten What counts as evidence in linguistics? This question is addressed by the contributions to the present volume (originally published as a Special Issue of Studies in Language 28:3 (2004). Focusing on the innateness debate, what is illustrated is how formal and functional approaches to linguistics have different perspectives on linguistic evidence. While special emphasis is paid to the status of typological evidence and universals for the construction of Universal Grammar (UG), this volume also highlights more general issues such as the roles of (non)-standard language and historical evidence. To address the overall topic, the following three guiding questions are raised: What type of evidence can be used for innateness claims (or UG)?; What is the content of such innate features (or UG)?; and, How can UG be used as a theory guiding empirical research? A combination of articles and peer commentaries yields a lively discussion between leading representatives of formal and functional approaches. |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 47
Seite 4
... factor for evaluating counter-evidence is certainly — and quite trivially — the quality of the research conducted. A ... factors were controlled for is, of course, more relevant than data obtained in a sloppy experiment. In general, we ...
... factor for evaluating counter-evidence is certainly — and quite trivially — the quality of the research conducted. A ... factors were controlled for is, of course, more relevant than data obtained in a sloppy experiment. In general, we ...
Seite 7
... factors, such as the field oflinguistics, the particular topic under investigation, or the willingness to consider data collected outside one's own field of research. 2.2 Types ofempirical data In the following, we will try to give a ...
... factors, such as the field oflinguistics, the particular topic under investigation, or the willingness to consider data collected outside one's own field of research. 2.2 Types ofempirical data In the following, we will try to give a ...
Seite 12
... factor is tested and all other factors are controlled for. In this sense, we will make sure that we only measure the influence of the tested independent variable (and not other confounding variables) on the measured dependent variable ...
... factor is tested and all other factors are controlled for. In this sense, we will make sure that we only measure the influence of the tested independent variable (and not other confounding variables) on the measured dependent variable ...
Seite 16
... factor determining performance, with other factors, such as e.g. processing limitations, social, pragmatic, or discourse factors affecting it, too, as illustrated in Figure 1 below. Linguistic competence remains a 'black box', which ...
... factor determining performance, with other factors, such as e.g. processing limitations, social, pragmatic, or discourse factors affecting it, too, as illustrated in Figure 1 below. Linguistic competence remains a 'black box', which ...
Seite 17
... factors affecting the use of language. Or, to put it negatively and echo Bates, what unites functional approaches to language is their rejection of Chomsky's conception of language, most crucially his view that the language capacity is ...
... factors affecting the use of language. Or, to put it negatively and echo Bates, what unites functional approaches to language is their rejection of Chomsky's conception of language, most crucially his view that the language capacity is ...
Inhalt
1 | |
51 | |
Remarks on the relation between language typology and Universal Grammar Commentary on Newmeyer | 75 |
Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description? | 81 |
Remarks on description and explanation in grammar Commentary on Haspelmath | 109 |
Authors response | 113 |
From UG to Universals Linguistic adaptation through iterated learning | 117 |
Form meaning and speakers in the evolution of language Commentary on Kirby Smith and Brighton | 139 |
A question of relevance Some remarks on standard languages | 181 |
The Relevance of Variation Remarks on Weißs StandardDialectProblem | 209 |
Authors response | 215 |
Universals innateness and explanation in second language acquisition | 217 |
Internal versus external universals Commentary on Eckman | 241 |
Authors response External universals and explanation in SLA | 245 |
What counts as evidence in historical linguistics? | 249 |
Abstraction and performance Commentary on Fischer | 283 |
Authors response | 143 |
Why assume UG? | 147 |
What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Commentary onWunderlich | 175 |
Authors response Is there any evidence that refutes the UG hypothesis? | 179 |
Authors response | 287 |
Subject index | 291 |
The series Benjamins Current Topics BCT | 298 |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics: The Case of Innateness Martina Penke,Anette Rosenbach Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2007 |
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acquired Aissen animacy approach argue argument brain Bresnan Cambridge child Chomsky clitic cognitive code Comrie constraints constructions cross-linguistic defined definition dialects difficult discussion domain-specific Eckman empirical English evolution example explanatory fact factors field find first language Fischer formal functional explanation functionalist genetic grammaticalization Haspelmath Hawkins hierarchy historical linguistics human language hypothesis inflection influence innate input Iohn iterated learning Kirby L2 learners language change language universals lexical Lightfoot linguistic theory linguistic typology markedness means morphological n-words Natural Language negation Newmeyer notion noun oflanguage ofthe Optimality Theory parameters Polysynthesis position possible predicate principles problem pronouns properties question reflect relative clauses relevant role scientific second language acquisition semantic speakers specific Standard German standard languages structure Subjacency syntactic syntax theoretical tion typological evidence typological universals Universal Grammar utterances variation verbs volume WeiB Williams syndrome word order Wunderlich