fancy was fo loofe and extravagant, as to be independent on the rule and government of judgment; but what he thought, was commonly fo great, fo juitly and rightly conceived in itfelf, that it wanted little or no correction, and was immediately approved by an impartial judgment at the first fight. But though the order of time in which the feveral pieces were written be generally uncertain, yet there are paffages in fome few of them which feem to fix their dates. So the Chorus at the end of the fourth act of Henry the Fifth, by a compliment very hand fomely turned to the earl of Effex, fhows the play to have been written when that lord was general for the queen in Ireland; and his elogy upon queen Elizabeth, and her fucceffor king James, in the latter end of his Henry the Eighth, is a proof of that play's being written after the acceffion of the latter of those two princes to the crown of England. Whatever the particular times of his writing were, the people of his age, who began to grow wonderfully fond of diversions of this kind, could not but be highly pleased to fee a genius arife amongst them of fo pleafurable, fo rich a vein, and fo plentifully capable of furnishing their favourite entertainments. Befides the ad. vantages of his wit, he was in himself a good-natured man, of great fweetnefs in his manners, and a moit agreeable companion; fo that it is no wonder, if, with fo many good qualities, he made himself acquainted with the best converfations of thofe times. Queen Elizabeth had feveral of his plays acted before her, and without doubt gave him many gracious marks of her favour: it is that maiden princess plainly, whom he intends by a fair vestal, throned by the west. A Midfummer-Night's Dream. and that whole paffage is a compliment very properly brought in, and very handfomely applied to her. She was fo well pleafed with that admirable character of Falstaff, in The Two Parts of Henry the Fourth, that the commanded him to continue it for one play more, and to show him in love. This is faid to be the occafion of his writing The Merry Wives of Windfor. How well fhe was obeyed, the play itself is an admirable proof. Upon this occafion it may not b 3 be be improper to observe, that this part of Falstaff is faid to have been written originally under the name of Oldcastle : fome of that family being then remaining, the queen was pleafed to command him to alter it; upon which he made ufe of Falftaff. The prefent offence was indeed avoided; but I do not know whether the author may not have been fomewhat to blame in his second choice, fince it is certain that Sir John Falstaff, who was a knight of the garter, and a lieutenant-general, was a name of diftinguifhed merit in the wars in France in Henry the Fifth's and Henry the Sixth's times. What grace foever the queen conferred upon him, it was not to her only he owed the fortune which the reputation of his wit made. He had the honour to meet with many great and uncommon marks of favour and friendfhip from the earl of Southampton, famous in the histories of that time for his friendship to the unfortunate earl of Effex. It was to that noble lord that he dedicated his poem of Venus and Adonis. There is one inftance fo fingular in the magnificence of this patron of Shakspeare's, that if I had not been affured that the ftory was handed down by Sir William D'Avenant, who was probably very well acquainted with his affairs, I fhould not have ventured to have inserted; that my lord Southampton at one time gave him a thoufand pounds, to enable him to go through with a purchase which he heard he had a mind to. A bounty very great, and very rare at any time, and almoft equal to that profufe generofity the prefent age has fhown to French dancers and Italian fingers, What particular habitude or friendfhips he contracted with private men, I have not been able to learn, more than that every one, who had a true tafte of merit, and could diftinguish men, had generally a juft value and efteem for him. His exceeding candour and good-nature must certainly have inclined all the gentler part of the world to love him, as the power of his wit obliged the men of the most delicate knowledge and polite learning to admire him. His acquaintance with Ben Jonfon began with a remarkable piece of humanity and good-nature; Mr. Jonfon, who was at that time altogether unknown to the world, had offered one of his plays to the players, in order to have it acted; acted; and the perfons into whofe hands it was put, after having turned it carelessly and fupercilioufly over, were just upon returning it to him with an ill-natured answer, that it would be of no fervice to their company; when Shakfpeare luckily caft his eye upon it, and found fomething fo well in it, as to engage him first to read it through, and afterwards to recommend Mr. Jonfon and his writings to the publick. Jonfon was certainly a very good fcholar, and in that had the advantage of Shakspeare; though at the fame time I believe it must be allowed, that what nature gave the latter, was more than a balance for what books had given the former; and the judgment of a great man upon this occafion was, I think, very juft and proper. In a converfation between Sir John Suckling, Sir William D'Avenant, Endymion Porter, Mr. Hales of Eton, and Ben Jonfon, Sir John Suckling, who was a profeffed admirer of Shakspeare, had undertaken his defence against Ben Jonfon with fome warmth; Mr. Hales, who had fat ftill for fome. time, told them, That if Mr. Shakspeare had not read the ancients, he had likewife not ftolen any thing from them; and that if he would produce any one topick finely treated by any one of them, he would undertake to fhew fomething upon the fame fubject at least as well written by Shakspeare. The latter part of his life was fpent, as all men of good fense will wish theirs may be, in eafe, retirement, and the converfation of his friends. He had the good fortune to gather an eftate equal to his occafion, and, in that, to his wifh; and is faid to have spent fome years before his death at his native Stratford. His pleafureable wit and goodnature engaged him in the acquaintance, and entitled him to the friendship, of the gentlemen of the neighbourhood. Amongst them, it is a story almoft ftill remembered in that country that he had a particular intimacy with Mr. Combe, an old gentleman noted thereabouts for his wealth and ufury it happened, that in a pleafant converfation amongst their common friends, Mr. Combe told Shakspeare in a aughing manner, that he fancied he intended to write his epitaph, if he happened to out-live him; and fince he could not know what might be faid of him when he was dead, he defired b 4 617 defired it might be done immediately; upon which Shakfpeare gave him these four verses : "Ten in the hundred lies here ingrav'd; ""Tis a hundred to ten his foul is not fav'd: "If any man afk, Who lies in this tomb? "Oh! ho! quoth the devil, 'tis my John-a-Combe.” But the sharpness of the fatire is faid to have ftung the man fo feverely, that he never forgave it. He died in the 53d year of his age, and was buried on the north fide of the chancel, in the great church at Stratford, where a monument is placed in the wall. On his grave-ftone underneath is, "Good friend, for Jefus' fake forbear "Bleft be the man that fpares thefe ftones, He had three daughters, of which two lived to be married; Judith, the elder, to one Mr. Thomas Quiney," by whom the had three fons, who all died without children; and Sufanna, who was his favourite, to Dr. John Hall, a phyfician of good reputation in that country. She left one child only, a daughter, who was married first to Thomas Nathe, efq.3 and afterwards to Sir John Barnard of Abington, but died likewife without issue. This 8 In this circumftance Mr. Rowe must have been mis-informed. In the Regitter of Stratford, no mention is made of any daughter of our author's but Sufanna and Judith. He had indeed three children; the two already mentioned, and a fon, named Hamnet, of whom Mr. Rowe takes no notice. He was a twin child, born at the fame time with Judith. Hence probably the mistake. He died in the twelfth year of his age, in 1596. MALONE. This af is a mistake. Judith was Shakspeare's youngest daughter, She died at Stratford-upon-Avon a few days after fhe had completed her feventy-fventh year, and was buried there, Feb. 9, 1661-62. She was married to Mr. Quiney, who was four years younger than herself, on the 10th of February, 1615-16, and not, as Mr. Weft supposed, in the year 1616-17. MALONE. 2 Sufanna's husband, Dr. John Hall, died in Nov. 1635, and is interred in the chancel of the church of Stratford near his wife. He was buried on the 26th of November. MALONE. 3 Elizabeth, our poet's grand-daughter, who appears to have been a favourite, This is what I could learn of any note, either relating to himself or family: the character of the man is beft leen in his writings. But fince Ben Jonfon has made a fort of an effay towards it in his Discoveries, I will give it in his words: "I remember the players have often mentioned it as an "honour to Shakspeare, that in writing (whatfoever he penned) he never blotted out a line. My anfwer hath "been, Would he had blotted a thousand! which they thought a malevolent fpeech. I had not told posterity this, but for their ignorance, who chofe that circumstance "to commend their friend by, wherein he moft faulted: and to justify mine own candour, for I loved the man, "and do honour his memory, on this fide idolatry, as <much as any. He was, indeed, honest, and of an open and free nature, had an excellent fancy, brave notions, "and gentle expreffions; wherein he flowed with that facility, that fometimes it was neceffary he should be ftopped: Sufflaminandus erat, as Auguftus faid of Ha"terius. His wit was in his own power; would the rule "of it had been fo too. Many times he fell into thofe things which could not efcape laughter; as when he "faid in the perfon of Cæfar, one fpeaking to him, "Cæfar thou doft me wrong, "He replied: "Cæfar did never wrong, but with just cause. " and fuch like, which were ridiculous. But he redeemed his vices with his virtues: there was ever more in him to "be praised than to be pardoned." As for the paffage which he mentions out of Shakspeare, there is somewhat like it in Julius Cafar, but without the abfurdity; nor did I ever meet with it in any edition that I have feen, as quoted by Mr. Jonfon. Befides favourite, Shakspeare having 1ft her by his will a memorial of his affection, though the at that time was but eight years old, was born in Feb. 1607.8, as appears by an entry in the Register of Stratford. MALONES |