When the death of one is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another the personal representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived against the latter for... Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Seite 135von Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1865Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1862 - 754 Seiten
...the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action, had he lived, against the latter, for an injury for the same act or omission." The former, had he lived, could not have maintained an • action, in the case at bar, against the latter... | |
| 1892 - 554 Seiten
...representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor." " The damages cannot exceed $10,000, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children, if any, or next of kin, lo be distributed in the same manner as personal property of the deceased."... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1901 - 704 Seiten
...the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission. This action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars and... | |
| 1875 - 870 Seiten
...at any time within one year thereafter, if the former could have maintained an action had he Hved, against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission, had it failed to produce death. (Rev. Code Ala. 1867,12297.) The damages recovered in such action cannot... | |
| Milo Adams McClelland - 1877 - 588 Seiten
...the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action, had he lived, against the latter for an injury...action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed five thousand dollars, and must enure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1877 - 748 Seiten
...may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an actiont had he lived, against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission." The complaint in the action alleged that the collision occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of... | |
| David Rorer - 1879 - 468 Seiten
...against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived, against the latter for the same act or omission. The action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed five thousand dollars, and must inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children,... | |
| 1894 - 2096 Seiten
...an action therefor ngainst t ho latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived, for an injury for the same act or omission. The action must be commenced within two years. The damages cannot exceed ten thousand dollars, and must Inure to the exclusive benefit of the widow and children,... | |
| 1908 - 2268 Seiten
...may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action bad he lived against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission. The action most be commenced within two years." The limitation here is contained in the same section by which... | |
| Chauncey F. Black, Samuel B. Smith - 1881 - 556 Seiten
...the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action, had he lived, against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission." The complaint in the action alleged that the collision occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of... | |
| |