Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 9
Seite 199
... Coca - Cola . The correctness of this ruling is not an issue herein , since plain- tiff has not appealed . The trial court submitted the plaintiff's case to the jury under instructions which permitted it to return ( 1 ) a verdict ...
... Coca - Cola . The correctness of this ruling is not an issue herein , since plain- tiff has not appealed . The trial court submitted the plaintiff's case to the jury under instructions which permitted it to return ( 1 ) a verdict ...
Seite 200
... Coca - Cola also contends that Lucky did not prove that it gave the notice required by section 1769 of the Civil Code . This section provides that , if " the buyer [ Lucky ] fails to give notice to the seller [ Coca - Cola ] of the ...
... Coca - Cola also contends that Lucky did not prove that it gave the notice required by section 1769 of the Civil Code . This section provides that , if " the buyer [ Lucky ] fails to give notice to the seller [ Coca - Cola ] of the ...
Seite 201
... Coca - Cola on July 10 , 1959. Coca - Cola never admitted receiving any notice of claim from plaintiff . In this respect , plaintiff relied upon a letter written by her attorney to Coca - Cola on July 20 , 1959. This letter was mis- ...
... Coca - Cola on July 10 , 1959. Coca - Cola never admitted receiving any notice of claim from plaintiff . In this respect , plaintiff relied upon a letter written by her attorney to Coca - Cola on July 20 , 1959. This letter was mis- ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
33 Cal.Rptr accident admission affirmed agreement Alcoholic Beverage Control alleged Am.Jur Appeal and Error appellant's application attorney automobile Brajevich broker Cal.App California cancellation carton cause of action Civil Procedure claim Coca-Cola Code Civ complaint constitute contends contract corporation counsel County damages decedent Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's determination easement employee escrow evidence fact favor fendant filed finding frontage road guilty hearing highway inference injuries instruction issue judgment jury liability license loan Los Angeles County Lucky Stores McKeever ment MICHAEL BLOCK motion negligence notice officer order denying owner party payments person Peskin petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent prior Proc proceeding proposed decision question real estate real property reason record res judicata rule Second Dist Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion Topanga trial court verdict violation Waltreus witness