Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 83
Seite 369
... question asked a witness where , after the court reserved ruling on the objection , defendant expressly withdrew the question when the court announced its readiness to rule . [ 6 ] Witnesses — Questions — Assuming Facts . — In a ...
... question asked a witness where , after the court reserved ruling on the objection , defendant expressly withdrew the question when the court announced its readiness to rule . [ 6 ] Witnesses — Questions — Assuming Facts . — In a ...
Seite 377
... question was too speculative . Counsel explained his reason for asking the question was that the witness , earlier dur- ing the cross - examination , had testified that in the " before " condition , with access openings existing for ...
... question was too speculative . Counsel explained his reason for asking the question was that the witness , earlier dur- ing the cross - examination , had testified that in the " before " condition , with access openings existing for ...
Seite 463
... question of whether a worker is an employee within the meaning of the Compensation Act . . . is referred to as a question of mixed law and fact to be proved like any other question . [ Citations . ] It is a question of fact upon which ...
... question of whether a worker is an employee within the meaning of the Compensation Act . . . is referred to as a question of mixed law and fact to be proved like any other question . [ Citations . ] It is a question of fact upon which ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
33 Cal.Rptr accident admission affirmed agreement Alcoholic Beverage Control alleged Am.Jur Appeal and Error appellant's application attorney automobile Brajevich broker Cal.App California cancellation carton cause of action Civil Procedure claim Coca-Cola Code Civ complaint constitute contends contract corporation counsel County damages decedent Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's determination easement employee escrow evidence fact favor fendant filed finding frontage road guilty hearing highway inference injuries instruction issue judgment jury liability license loan Los Angeles County Lucky Stores McKeever ment MICHAEL BLOCK motion negligence notice officer order denying owner party payments person Peskin petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent prior Proc proceeding proposed decision question real estate real property reason record res judicata rule Second Dist Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion Topanga trial court verdict violation Waltreus witness