Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 49
Seite 76
1. Did the Real Estate Commissioner have jurisdiction to discipline a real estate broker for violations of the Real Prop- erty Loan Brokers ' Law occurring in 1955 and 1956 ? [ 1 ] In order for the Real Estate Commissioner to have ...
1. Did the Real Estate Commissioner have jurisdiction to discipline a real estate broker for violations of the Real Prop- erty Loan Brokers ' Law occurring in 1955 and 1956 ? [ 1 ] In order for the Real Estate Commissioner to have ...
Seite 77
... real estate broker . Therefore , the fact that licensees were real estate brokers is immaterial . They were not performing the normal func- tions of a real estate broker in conducting their loan business . Consequently , they conclude ...
... real estate broker . Therefore , the fact that licensees were real estate brokers is immaterial . They were not performing the normal func- tions of a real estate broker in conducting their loan business . Consequently , they conclude ...
Seite 295
... real estate broker , as an inactive real estate salesman , and as a business opportunity broker , on the ground of dishonest conduct , where the issue was whether petitioner concealed from her principals secret deal- ings with the ...
... real estate broker , as an inactive real estate salesman , and as a business opportunity broker , on the ground of dishonest conduct , where the issue was whether petitioner concealed from her principals secret deal- ings with the ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
33 Cal.Rptr accident admission affirmed agreement Alcoholic Beverage Control alleged Am.Jur Appeal and Error appellant's application attorney automobile Brajevich broker Cal.App California cancellation carton cause of action Civil Procedure claim Coca-Cola Code Civ complaint constitute contends contract corporation counsel County damages decedent Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's determination easement employee escrow evidence fact favor fendant filed finding frontage road guilty hearing highway inference injuries instruction issue judgment jury liability license loan Los Angeles County Lucky Stores McKeever ment MICHAEL BLOCK motion negligence notice officer order denying owner party payments person Peskin petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent prior Proc proceeding proposed decision question real estate real property reason record res judicata rule Second Dist Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion Topanga trial court verdict violation Waltreus witness