Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

teenth. Tiraboschi, in spite of his natural partiality for the claims of his own countrymen, is decidedly of opinion that the honor of the invention rests with the Spanish Arabs.

Many of the most distinguished scholars of the middle ages acquired their knowledge at some of the seventeen universities that Middeldorpf has enumerated as flourishing under the Mohammedan empire in Spain. So early as 873, Hartmot, Abbot of St. Gallen, caused some of his monks to study Arabic, as the great source of useful information; and in many of the other Benedictine monasteries the study of Arabic literature was prosecuted with ardor and success. The most remarkable of those Christian students, who, in their zeal for knowledge, were contented to sit at the feet of the Mohammedan sages of Andalusia, was Gerbert, a native of France, who, under the name of Sylvester II., swayed the Papal sceptre from 999 until 1003. He left his home at an early age, and travelled over a great part of Europe in pursuit of knowledge; and it was at Seville and Cordova that his longing was fully gratified. He drank deep at the fountains of Arabic science; and on his return from Spain founded two schools,one at Bobbio, in Italy, and the other at Rheims. It was Gerbert who first introduced into Europe the knowledge and use of the Arabic numerals. His example induced numerous scholars from Italy, France, Germany, and England, to repair to the Moorish colleges for the purpose of prosecuting their studies. Montucla, in his "Histoire de Mathematiques," affirms that, for several centuries, all who were most eminent in that department of science acquired their knowledge from the Arabs. Amongst the Italians, Gherardo di Cremona studied philosophy, medicine and astronomy at Toledo, and translated into Latin the Almagest of Ptolemy and the medical works of Razes and Avicenna. Leonardo of Pisa introduced into Italy the knowledge of arithmetic and algebra, which he had derived from his Moorish teachers; and Arnold of Villanova was indebted to the same source for his acquirements in physics, astronomy, and medicine.

Amongst English scholars, Adelard, a Benedictine monk of Bath, Daniel Morley, a native of Norfolk,and Michael Scott, of wizard fame, acquired much of their skill and learning from the Moors. The illustrious Roger Bacon drew his knowledge of chemistry,

philosophy, and mathematics from Arabic manuscripts. He cites Alhagen's treatise upon optics, which was composed in the twelfth century; from which, also, Vitellio, who had considerable reputation for optical skill, borrowed all he knew upon the subject. Several of the Christian monarchs of the middle ages were sensible of the value of Arabic teachers and manuscripts. Charlemagne commanded the most important Arabic works to be translated into Latin, with the view of improving the education of the people throughout his empire. In Germany, Otho of Frisinger,and in Italy, Frederic the Second, ordered translations to be made from several Arabic manuscripts; whilst liberal offers of Alphonso the Tenth, of Castile, induced many learned Moors to settle as teachers at Toledo.

It may, perhaps, be alleged that the Spanish Arabs, owing to a fond partiality for their own copious and majestic tongue, and their contempt for all other languages, did not derive from their vast collections of books all the advantages which they might have done, if they had studied the Greek and Latin classics in the originals, instead of through the medium of Arabic translations. We may, indeed, lament that they neglected or despis ed the orators, poets, and historians of ancient Rome; but we ought, at the same time, to remember that their translations have preserved to us the substance of many a classic which can no longer be found in the original. It may also be asserted, with some degree of plausibility, that the genius of the Moors was rather subtle and penetrating than profound, and that much of their literary industry was expended in the pursuit of trifles. To a certain extent this accusation is true; but we ought never to forget what they actually achieved, whilst contemplating what they might have performed. Our obligations to them are most important: they became the connecting link between the civilization of ancient and modern Europe; and it was the success of their literary efforts which first excited the rivalry, and roused the dormant energies of Christendom, from the long sleep of the dark ages; and to them we are indebted for the revival and improvement of the exact and physical sciences, as well as for many of those useful and elegant arts and inventions which have contributed so powerful an impulse to the literature and civilization of Europe.

From the Biographical Magazine.

OBITUARY.

JANUARY TO JUNE, 18 5 5.

In the sphere of POLITICS two names-on the opposite extremes of the horizon-have been blotted from the list of the living. Of all the men who mark and make epochs in the world's history, those may most truly be said to belong to their age, who either inaugurate a new order of things or whose death closes the line of representatives of some principle that has been before the world for centuries. Of these last, let us hope that NICHOLAS, Emperor of Russia, may one day prove to have been one. It may yet be seen that at this point in European history a pure despotism has ceased to be possible; that he who henceforth aspires to rule, even in Russia, must rule, if not in constitutional forms, at least in the spirit which all constitutions endeavor more or less successfully to embody; must rule, that is to say, in some degree, with a view to the welfare and the will of his people.

Perhaps, too, the future historian may find in this our half-yearly list one name worthy to rank among the makers of new epochs, the name of JOSEPH HUME. These two men,* whose careers came to an end within so

*Notices of both have already appeared among the "Lives of the Illustrious," Vol. II., p. 78, and Vol. IV., p. 273. These sketches were drawn while the subjects of them were yet in the full pursuit of their career; the present notice, partaking rather of the nature of an obituary, will, avoiding repetition as much as possible, treat of their lives from this new and altered point of sight. It may be as well to say here, that we shall record in this chronicle the names of the recently dead, without regard to notices which may have already appeared, and without precluding a more lengthened biography whenever there shall seem to be any sufficient adVantage in looking back. We are indebted to the Times and other journals for permission to avail

ourselves,in the instances acknowledged in the text, of the valuable memoirs which have already appeared in their columns.

short a period of each other, might well stand as representatives of the opposite tendencies that are now doing stern battle, not with arms only, but wherever men meet together and have dealings one with another. The one, a one, a monarch by questionable "Divine right," ruling seventy millions of human beings, with the modicum of wisdom and goodness alloted to him; the other, an uncrowned king of men, ruling by the unquestionable (not less Divine) right of his own God-given insight and truthfulness. In both there was a force that would not let them be lost sight of by whoever looks out on the affairs of the world; in both, too, were defects which, though different in kind, should not be forgotten.

It is not always that royal personages can claim a place in the chronicle of the truly illustrious, however wide our interpretation of the phrase; yet the three members of the Sardinian Royal family, who, within a few days, were snatched away by death, deserve to be noticed here, as well for personal qualities, as for the influence which, in life and death, they have wielded over the fate of Europe. The kingdom of Sardinia, or more properly of Piedmont, has claims upon English sympathies above most others, as being destined, we may hope, to be the cradle of that new and united Italy, towards which the eyes of all lovers of freedom are now turned. Whether the progress of Italy, towards a higher culture and broader liberties, shall be gradual and joyous, or blood stained and tardy, depends very mainly on the wisdom of the ruler of Piedmont in these eventful times; and hence it is not unimportant to note the dispositions of those who are and have been closely connected with the sovereign. QUEEN DOWAGER MARIA THERESA, mother of King Victor Emanuel, has perhaps exercis

The

ed less influence than the others whom we shall have here to name. She was the second daughter of Ferdinand II., the late Duke of Tuscany, and sister, therefore, to Leopold, the reigning Duke. She was born on the 21st March, 1801, and married on the 30th September, 1817, to Charles Albert,the late King of Piedmont, who died in exile in Portugal, in 1849-not too soon for the interests of humanity. Her influence in matters of State, so we are informed, was not great; and her death, at Turin, on the 12th of January, will have affected few beyond those who were bound to the deceased by family and personal ties.

Of wider interest was the announcement of the death of MARIE ADELAIDE, wife of Victor Emanuel, the present King of Sardinia, eight days only after the death of the Queen Dowager. Not seeking to enter into the intrigues of statesmen, she mixed in public affairs only to know where she might heal sorrow, or reconcile any of those sad divisions which too often arose among those dear to her, during the War of Independence. She was born the 3d June, 1822, being the daughter of the Archduke Rainier of Austria, her mother (the Princess Mary, still living) being the sister of Charles Albert. Her marriage, therefore, with Victor Emanuel (April 12, 1842) was an event of domestic as well as public interest. Born and bred in a despotic court, a devoted member of that Church which has long been the foe of Italian freedom, and which, when she first entered Turin, had almost unlimited power at the Court of Charles Albert, we are assured that neither Vienna nor Rome ever found in her the means of influencing the mind of the King.

name must be forever associated with the conquest of Peschiera. On the 30th of May, 1848, at the close of the battle of Goito, Charles Albert received a letter from his son Ferdinand, announcing that he had planted the standard of Italian freedom, after a siege of fifteen days, on the bastion of this fortress; where, in 1800, the illustrious General had vainly expended so much blood and so much precious time. It was on the 13th of April, 1848, that the Sicilian Assembly decreed,

Sicily is henceforth a constitutional monarchy, and calls to the throne an Italian Prince;" and the Prince whom the represen tatives of these generous islanders called to the throne was Ferdinand Maria. The hopes of Sicilian independence were too soon blasted, but the man of their choice would assuredly have shown himself worthy of a place among the sovereigns of Europe. The late Duke was married on the 22d April, 1850, to Elizabeth, daughter of Prince John, now King of Saxony, by whom he had two children, a son and a daughter. His death, on the 10th of February, will leave a vacancy, in private and public spheres, which only the lapse of many years can fill up.

Those who have studied the history of the Peninsular war, and to whom the party names of Carlist and Christino are as echoes of the past, have scarcely remembered that DON CARLOS was, until recently, a living person.

Charles Marie Isidore, Infant of Spain, better known as Don Carlos, son of the King Charles IV., was born on the 29th March, 1788, and expired at Trieste, on the 10th March. 1855, at the age of sixty-seven

The deceased Queen leaves four sons, Um-years. berto, Armedeo, Oddone, and Vittorio, and two daughters, Clotilde and Marie-the eldest born in 1833. It is no mere courtly phrase to say that the Piedmontese people mourned her untimely death (on the 20th of January of puerperal fever) as a loss to themselves, and not less as the deepest wound that could befall the husband whom she loved so dearly.

Another short space of three weeks, and the King of Piedmont is again a mournerthis time for his only brother, FERDINAND MARIA, DUKE OF GENOA, was born the 15th November, 1822-and throughout life had shared the successes and sorrows of his elder brother. His especial delight was in the army, who now mourn in him a brave and generous leader. In the first war of Independence, he took a glorious part, and his

Ferdinand VII., brother of the late Don Carlos, ascended the throne of Spain amidst the happiest auspices. As Prince of the Asturias, he had acquired the popularity which had deserted his parent. That feebleminded monarch, carried away by his affection for Godoy, the Prince of Peace, abdicated his throne rather than endanger the life of his courtly minion. Ferdinand was crowned with the diadem that had once circled the regal brow of Charles V., and the Spanish nation--undismayed by the approach of the French army of invasion--hailed the accession of their new monarch with demonstrations of joy. In the hour of danger Ferdinand proved himself unworthy of the af fections of his subjects and of the blood they shed in the protection of his throne. Then followed the brief reign of Joseph, the Patriotic insurrection, the Peninsular war,

[ocr errors]

and the restoration of Ferdinand, who, like | by the aid of a royal favorite whom he had a true Bourbon, had in his days of adversity bribed, obtains a revocation of the law which "neither learnt nor forgotten." The Con- had destroyed his hopes of the throne. The stitution was repeatedly broken by this working to all appearance expires, and the Carlshipper of absolutism, and the prisons of the ist party adopt every measure to consolidate kingdom were crowded with those who had their power. Ferdinand, to the confusion of steadfastly sustained his cause and had been the latter, awakes from his lethargy, annuls most lavish of their blood. The revolution the act of revocation, banishes Don Carlos of 1820 ensued, which extorted from the from the kingdom, arrests the chiefs of the fears of the royal tyrant the Constitution clergy, and appoints his consort Queen Rewhich his gratitude to the noble Spanish gent during the minority of Isabella II. The nation, or his sense of justice should have reign of Ferdinand VII. terminated in 1833; bestowed without constraint. Three years and the monarch who had ascended the later, this Constitution was disregarded by throne of Spain amidst the rejoicings of the Ferdinand, and the assistance of French bay- nation, closed his earthly career amidst the onets was claimed by that monarch to coerce indifference or hatred of his subjects. In the his rebellious subjects. Towards the termi-year 1834 Don Carlos invaded Spain, and nation of his reign each succeeding year witnessed its gloomy tyranny--consequent insurrections, civil war, and a ferocious retaliation on the defeated patriots. Ferdinand VII. had contracted three alliances during the vicissitudes of his career, but his old age found him alike childless and without a friend. The crown would, therefore, on his demise, have descended to his brother Don Carlos, the subject of our commentary. This Prince, of a gloomy and bigoted nature, had acquired the confidence and support of the Spanish clergy, who foresaw, in the fanatic disposition of Don Carlos, a fitting instrument to advance the re-establishment of the Holy Inquisition, and the former priestly reign of terror. An estrangement, approaching to actual hatred, had sprung up between the two brothers; and Ferdinand, not despairing of a direct succession, contracted a fourth marriage. Maria Christina, a younger sister of the Bourbon King of Naples-the present Queen-mother of Spain and Duchess of Rianzares - was the object of his

choice. The natural wishes of Ferdinand were about to be gratified; and, in his determination to establish a direct lineage, the old monarch abolished, with the sanction of the Cortes, the Salique law, introduced into Spain by his ancestor, Philip V. The foresight of the King proved fortunate, for, on the 16th of October, 1831, the present Queen Isabella II. was born. Don Carlos protested vehemently against the measure which had given a queen to Spain, and had deprived him of his expected crown. Α startling episode shortly occurred, which resembled more the exaggerated intrigue of a dramatic plot, than a plain historical fact. Ferdinand is supposed to be on his death-bed. The clergy are on the alert. Don Carlos,

was proclaimed King by his adherents. The aristocracy, fearing the curtailment of their privileges, and the clergy, for the reason already stated, supported his claims to the throne, and a civil war speedily broke out. Then ensued the terrible struggle between the partisans of the Pretender, and the supporters of Isabella II. The alternate successes of the Christinos and the Carlists deluged Spain with blood, and impoverished the country. After a cruel contest of several years, the nation recoiled at the fearful and continued sacrifices demanded of it, and this intestine war ceased. The services of the British Legion and the qualities of Espartero contributed in no small degree to the happy result. Thus disappointed in his ambitious projects, Don Carlos retired from the Spanish territory, and was detained under surveillance in Bourges from 1839 to 1845. In that year he renounced all pretensions to the throne of Spain, in favor of his son, and, quitting the soil of France, he retired into Italy, where he breathed his last.

Don Carlos married, in 1816, the Infanta Maria Francisca d'Assise, daughter of John VI., King of Portugal. He lost his first wife in 1834, and was married, in 1838, to the Infanta Maria Theresa Princess de Beira, daughter of John VI. King of Portugal, and widow of the Infante Don Pedro of Spain. By his first marriage Don Carlos leaves two sons, to the eldest of whom, Don Carlos Luis Conde Montemolin, he ceded his claims to the Spanish throne on the 18th of May, 1845. The Conde de Montemolin was married in July, 1850, to the Princess Maria Caroline Ferdinanda, sister of Ferdinand II. King of the Two Sicilies.

With Don Carlos died one of the most

formidable representatives of legitimatism in | Appointed a President of the Provisional Europe, and in the person of his son there is little fear of a revival of his claims.

Government, and of the Council of Ministers, he had now become too old to take an active part in state affairs, and he merely lent to his more energetic colleagues the sanctity of his well-known name. Like them, he had to yield before the iron rule of military disasters, and the accession of General Cavaignac to the Presidency, was the signal of his final exit.

M. THEODORE Ducos, the French Minister of Marine and the Colonies, died March 17, after a long and painful illness. He was born in 1801, at Bordeaux. His father, at one time a respectable merchant in that city, failed, and was totally ruined. The late minister, about the year 1815, was happy to obtain a situation as a merchant's clerk, at a salary of 100l. a year. Shortly afterwards, he had placed at his disposal a capital of 30,000 francs, with which he set up in business. In a few years he became a leading merchant. M. Ducos took his seat in the Chamber of Deputies for the first time, in 1834, for his native city, and was re-elected afterwards without any difficulty. He belonged to the Centre Gauche, or Liberal Conservative party, sitting on the same benches as M. de Morny, to whose acquaintance, doubtless, his subsequent rise was owing. When the Legitimist Deputies undertook the pilgrimage to Belgrave-square, for the purpose of expressing their sympathy to the Count de Chambord, it was M. Ducos who proposed that the famous word flétrir should

Two statesmen, who have watched the course of one régime after another in France, have been removed during the present year. M. DUPONT DE L'EURE died on the 3d of March. JACQUES CHARLES DUPONT (DE L'EURE) was born February 27, 1767. After having completed his collegiate education, he turned his attention to the study of the law, and began public life as a barrister. His talent, energy, and patriotism, very speedily brought him forward; during the stormy progress of the French Revolution, he was unanimously appointed to important magisterial duties, and he invariably justified, by his moderation and firmness, the confidence which his fellow citizens reposed in him. Dupont de l'Eure's political career may be said to have commenced in 1813, when he was returned to the corps legislatif, by the electors of the town of Evreux; named vice-president of the Chamber, under the government of the "hundred days," the manliness of his behavior contrasted strongly with the pusillanimity which everywhere prevailed. Nothing could induce him to quit his post, and he withdrew from his seat in the House only when compelled to do so by main force. The year 1817 saw Dupont de l'Eure once more chosen as one of the representatives of the nation. He took his place on the Opposition benches, and for twenty-five consecutive years encouraged the Liberal party in their struggle against the reactionary ten-be applied to them in the address drawn up dencies of the aristocracy. It was not likely at the beginning of the session. He was one that such a course should remain unnoticed of the earliest adherents to the coup d'état of by the ruling powers; accordingly, a decree 1851, and had held office ever since. His of M. Peyronnet, the Keeper of the Seals, Ministry will long be remembered as one deprived Dupont de l'Eure of his office, as characterized by energy, skill, and perseverPresident of the Court at Rouen; and after ance of no ordinary degree. "In two years twenty-seven years' arduous service, the ven- and a half," says the Times, "he placed at erable magistrate was dismissed without even the service of the country sixty ships of war, a pension. When the July revolution broke twenty-four of which were first-rates, carryout, Dupont de l'Eure hailed it as the dawning 3,000 guns, and with a motive power of a truly liberal epoch, and consented to join equal to that of 23,000 tons." Louis Philippe's first Cabinet in the capacity of Minister of Justice, He soon, however, discovered that the Orleans dynasty had no intention of carrying on the work of reform to the full extent he anticipated, and in December, 1830, he sent in his resignation, satisfied with watching and checking, as far as he could, the ultra-Conservative policy of M. Guizot's administration. The Republican outburst of February, 1848, was another stage in Dupont de l'Eure's political life-it was the last.

Death has been busy among the notables of Greece. M. VARNAVAS PANGALOS, the oldest of the patriots who struggled for the independence of Greece, and one of those who sacrificed a large fortune to the cause, died at Athens in January last, at the remarkable age of 111 years. General TSAVELLAS, the hero of Missolonghi; GARDSKIOTIS GRIVAS, formerly Palace Marshal; and DELIANY, formerly President of the Senate, all

« ZurückWeiter »