Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 81
Seite 620
... offer of February 11 , 1960 , failed to comport with the terms of the listing in several particulars in addition to its crucial variance with the intention of the seller concern- ing subordination . It increased the purchase price ...
... offer of February 11 , 1960 , failed to comport with the terms of the listing in several particulars in addition to its crucial variance with the intention of the seller concern- ing subordination . It increased the purchase price ...
Seite 624
... offer , on February 12 , 1960 , expressed in the same terms set forth in the original written listing , such offer being presented by the same intended purchaser , " or nominee . ' By this time defendant had discussed with an officer of ...
... offer , on February 12 , 1960 , expressed in the same terms set forth in the original written listing , such offer being presented by the same intended purchaser , " or nominee . ' By this time defendant had discussed with an officer of ...
Seite 625
... offer . Here , it was Firestone Corp. or nominee . Assuming defendant accepted the offer and that Firestone changed its mind , the latter could designate anyone as its nominee . The seller would then have to look to the nominee . The ...
... offer . Here , it was Firestone Corp. or nominee . Assuming defendant accepted the offer and that Firestone changed its mind , the latter could designate anyone as its nominee . The seller would then have to look to the nominee . The ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
30 Cal.Rptr accident affidavit affirmed agent agreement alleged Am.Jur amount Appeal and Error appellant's appellate court arbitration attorney automobile award broker Cal.App California cause of action Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitute contention contract contractor contributory negligence corporation counsel County damages Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's dence denied determined easement Eminent Domain employee fact favor fendant filed finding fraud granted hearing instruction insurer issue judgment jury levee liability license Los Angeles County marijuana matter ment motion narcotic Nevada officer parties Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent proceeding question real estate reasonable record recover References request rule Sam Bradford scratch sheet Second Dist Stanley Mosk statute subrogation summary judgment Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge trust vehicle verdict witness