...traders. A case of that kind appears to have been brought to trial upwards of twenty years ago. It was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange, payable to Butler and Co. and their order, and indorsed in that name. The plaintiff was so...

...in the case of Caroick -0. Vicktry, but gives no countenance to the doctrine now contended for. That was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill payable to two persons, one of \vhom had indorsed it in the name of himself and the other before it...

...l6'9-— Selwyn Ni. Pri. 4th edit. 328. Pierson v. Hutcliinson, 2 Campb. 211. — 6 Esp. Rrp. 156. SC — This was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange. The attorney-general, in opening the plaintiff's case, stated that he should not be able...

...the words " his proper hand being thereunto subscribed" omitted. Levy v. Wilson, 5 Esp. 180. 26. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange, the declaration stated that the payee indorsed it, his own proper hand being thereunto subscribed....

...the time of the bankruptcy. Thompson anc Others v. Giles and Others, Assignees, M. 4 G. 4. 422 3. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange ivhereof ES was the payee, the plaintiff proved that a person call ing himself £. S. came...

...— Held, that on these pleadings the defendant was entitled to begin. Faith v. M'Intyre, 44 2. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange alleged to be an accommodation bill, the drawer was called as a witness for the defendant....

...very material one. And see Coles e. Parkin, 12 East. 471. « Webber r. Robert Maddocks, 3 Campb. 1. Indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange. It appeared that Samuel aud Robert Maddocks, being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 110/., they agreed to give...

...of Uorsed it for n, the , and the indorsee privy to the alteration: discharged, MACINTOSH v. HAYDON. THIS was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange drawn by F. Uniein, |, n d payable to his order. The declaration alleged a general acceptance....

...nor did the plaintiff acquire any right by the transfer. In Wallace v. Hardacre," « J Camp. R. which was an action by the indorsee against the acceptor °' of a bill of exchange, Lord Ellcnborough held, "thai in •15 JAXUART imnrdcr <° bar the right of the indorsee,...

...possession is evidence of ownership. See Bulkley v. Butler, 2 B. fy C. 441. 444. Mead v. Young, 4 TR 28. In an action by the indorsee against the acceptor of a bill of which ES was the payee, the plaintiff proved that a person calling himself ES came to C. having in...