A Review of Recent Legal Decisions Affecting Physicians, Dentists, Druggists and the Public Health: Together with a Brief for the Prosecution of Unlicensed Practitioners of Medicine, Dentistry, Or Pharmacy, with a Paper Upon Manslaughter, Christian Science and the Law and Other Matter
E.B. Treat, 1899 - 105 Seiten
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
A Review of Recent Legal Decisions Affecting Physicians, Dentists, Druggists ...
William Archer Purrington
Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2008
action alleged answer appeared apply asked attendance authority called cause certificate charge Christian cited College Commonwealth compensation condition contrary convicted court cure damages death defendant dental dentist dentistry diploma directed disease duty effect entitled establish evidence examination exemptions expert fact fees forbidding give ground Held holding hospital injury issue judge judgment jury knowledge Legal liable license matter methods nature necessary negligence objection Ohio operation opinion patient performed persons physician plaintiff practice practice of medicine practising medicine practitioner prescribe prevent privilege profession professional proof prosecution proved providing question reason record recover refused registered remedy reported result rule Science sick skill Society splint statute supra surgeon surgery testified testimony tion treat treatment trial witness York
Seite 8 - Few professions require more careful preparation by one who seeks to enter it than that of medicine. It has to deal with all those subtle and mysterious influences upon which health and life depend...
Seite 103 - Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious beliefs and opinions, they may with practices. Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived...
Seite 101 - The object of the statute is to protect the afflicted from the pretensions of the ignorant and avaricious, and its provisions are not limited to those who attempt to follow beaten paths and established usages.
Seite 101 - But Peter said unto him ; Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money.
Seite 97 - So here. The defendant knew that he was using kerosene. The jury have found that it was applied as the result of foolhardy presumption or gross negligence, and that is enough. Commonwealth v. Stratton, 114 Mass. 303, 305. Indeed, if the defendant had known the fatal tendency of the prescription, he would have been perilously near the line of murder.
Seite 97 - ... would foresee that in a given case it would do damage, a person who did not foresee it, and who had no warning, would not be held liable for the harm. If men were held answerable for everything they did which was dangerous in fact, they would be held for all their acts from which harm in fact ensued. The use of the thing must be dangerous according to common experience, at least to the extent that there is a manifest and appreciable chance of harm from what is done, in view either of the actor's...