« ZurückWeiter »
universe; 7. of reducing enquiries to practice, or making them subservient to human uses; 8. of the preliminaries to enquiry; 9. and lastly, of the ascending and descending scale of Axioms”. 22. Among the prerogative instances for interpreting nature, in the first place come the solitary kindt ; that is, 1. those which exhibit the nature enquired after, in such subjects as have nothing common with others, besides that very, nature; or, 2. those that exhibit the nature en
* Of these nine general heads, under which the remaining parts of the Novum Organum were to have been comprised, no more than the first is prosecuted by the Author. Nor was any thing afterwards published towards executing the rest, though it appears that the whole design was laid from the first, and that, at times, the other parts were goue on with, after the present piece was published. The want of these additional Sections may, perhaps, be in some measure supplied by a close attention to the present Doctrine of Instances. But, in order to render the whole more generally intelligible and useful, it were greatly to be wished that some tolerably qualified person would give an essay upon it, in as familiar a manner as the subject will allow. See Dr. Hook's Method of Improving Natural Philosophy.
f Let it be remembered that, with regard to the names of the several kinds of instances hereafter mentioned, the Author had a right to impose them, as the subject was entirely: new and untouched. And, doubtless, certain definitions and names are required, where things are to be carefully distinguished. . . ;
4' quired aster, in such subjects as are every way similar to others, excepting in that very nature. For it is manifest, that such instances as these will shorten the enquiry, and promote and hasten the exclusion"; so that a few of them may do the service of many. - - - - - - * * * * * * For example, 1... if the enquiry be about the nature of colour, solitary instances are prisms, and crystal gems, or glasses, which represent colours, not only in themselves, but also externally upon a wall, &c. Understand the same of dews, &c. For these have nothing in common with the fixed colours of flowers, coloured gems, coloured glass, metals, various woods, &c. obesides the colour itself. Whence it may be easily inferred, that colour is nothing more than an alteration in the rays of light, occasioned, in the first case, by different degrees of incidence+; and, in the second, by the different texture, or structure of the body, and so reflected to the eye. But these instances are solitary, or single,
in point of likenessf. o . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . He , * See above, Table IV, Aph, 18 . . . . . . . . ......a...?
t Viz. In the prism, glasses, dew, &c. Which kind of instance led the Archbishop of Spalato, Dr. Hook, Mr. Boyle, Sir Isaac Newton, &c. to very considerable discoveries in the subject of colours. * * * * * * * * of Viz. Dissimilar in all respects besides that of colour, in which the solitariness of the instance consists. : . “. . . . o. o.
o, --, -, -, -, or A (2.), Again, in the same enquiry, the distinct veins of black and white in marble, and the va: riegation of colours in flowers of the same species, are solitary instances, for the black and white parts of marble, or the spots of white and purple in carnations, agree almost in every respect, exceptin colour. Whence it is easily collected, that colour does not greatly depend upon the intrinsic nature of the coloured body, but is owing to a somewhat gross, or bare mechanical texture of the parts”. Thus these instances are solitary, in point of difference. And we call . both the kinds by one and the same name.
23. In the second place come travelling instances, or those wherein the nature enquired after, travels, or advances to generation, when it was not before in being; or, on the contrary, travels, or tends to destruction, when it was in being before. And, therefore, in either corrolative, such instances are always duplicate; or rather one instance, in motion, or passage, is continued to the opposite periodt. And instances of this kind not only accelerate and confirm the business of exclusion, but also drive the affirmation, or form itself, into a narrow compass.
****** **** -go - *. - o: * See Mr. Boyle of colours. ..., , , , , ---
... t That is, either there is both a generation and destruc
tion, or else one and the same process begins with genera:
tion, and ends with destruction.
For the form of the thing must necessarily be somewhat introduced, or abolished, by this transmigration. And though all exclusion promotes and forwards the affirmation, yet this is more directly done in the same subject, than in different ones; for it plainly appears, from all we have said before, that the form discovering itself in one thing, leads to its discovery in all the rest. But the more simple this passage is, the nobler the instance should be esteemed. Again, these travelling instances are of great use in practice, because, as they exhibit the form joined with an efficient, or privation”, they clearly design, or mark out the practical operation in some cases; whence any easy passage is also afforded to the neighbouring discoveries. There is, however, some danger in these instances, that requires a particular caution ; for they may be apt to restrain the form too much to the efficient, and to infect, or at least to tinge the understanding with a false notion of the form, through an apparent mixture of the efficient; whereas the efficient is never more than the vehicle of the form +. But this inconvenience is easily remedied by making a just exclusions.
* See above, Part II. Sect. I. Aph. 1, 4, &c. ... • 't See Part II. Sect. I. Aph. 2, &c. • * # See Table IV. Aph. 18. - - . . .
... To give an example of a travelling instance; suppose the nature enquired after were whiteness, an instance advancing to generation” is glass, whole, and in powder; and again, simple water, and water beat into froth; for whole glass, and simple water, are transparent bodies, not white; but powdered glass, and the froth of water, are white, not transparent. It comes therefore to be enquired, what has happened to the glass, or water, in this transmigration f; for, it is manifest, that the form of whiteness travels, or is conveyed over by pounding the glass, and agitating the water; but nothing is here found added, besides a bare comminution of the parts of the glass, and the water, together with the interposition of the air. And it is no small acquisition in discovering the form of whiteness, that two bodies, of themselves more or less transparent, viz. air and water, or air and glass, being mixed together, in subtile or small parts, should exhibit whiteness, by differently reflecting the rays of lightf. We must also give an example of the danger, and caution, above-mentioned; for it may here readily occur to the understanding, depraved by
* Viz. The generation of whiteness.
+ Viz. From transparency to whiteness.
# See Mr. Boyle's History of Colours, Dr. Hook's Lectures of Light, and Sir Isaac Newton's Optics, passim,