The Judiciary and American Democracy: Alexander Bickel, the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, and Contemporary Constitutional Theory
Examines recent debates in constitutional theory in light of the work of Alexander Bickel.
The role courts should play in American democracy has long been contested, fueling debates among citizens who take an active interest in politics. Alexander Bickel made a significant contribution to these debates with his seminal publication, The Least Dangerous Branch, which framed the problem of defending legitimate judicial authority. This book addresses whether or not the countermajoritarian difficulty outlined in Bickel’s work continues to have significance for constitutional theory almost a half-century later. The contributors illustrate how the countermajoritarian difficulty and Bickel’s response to it engage prominent theories: the proceduralisms of John Hart Ely and Jeremy Waldron; the republicanisms of Bruce Ackerman and Cass Sunstein; and the originalisms of Raoul Berger, Robert Bork, and Keith Whittington. In so doing, this book provides a useful introduction to recent debates in constitutional theory and also contributes to the broader discussion about the proper role of the courts.
At Texas State University at San Marcos, Kenneth D. Ward is Associate Professor and Cecilia R. Castillo is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science. Castillo is the coeditor (with Kenneth L. Grasso) of Liberty Under Law: American Constitutionalism, Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Principle Prudence and Judicial Power
The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Regimes
Alexander Bickel and the New Judicial Minimalism
Democratic Constitutionalism The BickelAckerman
The Countermajoritarian Difficulty Tradition Versus
An Empirical Analysis of Alexander Bickels
Bickel and the New Proceduralists
Constitutional Theory and the Faces of Power
List of Contributors
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
The Judiciary and American Democracy: Alexander Bickel, the ...
Kenneth D. Ward,Cecilia R. Castillo
Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2006
accept Ackerman action Alexander allow Amendment American argues argument authority avoid believes Bickel branches citizens claim commitment common conception concern considered constitutional law constitutional theory constitutionalism contribution countermajoritarian difficulty critical decide decisions defense deliberation democracy democratic develop discussion effective elected enforce equality example exercise fact final fundamental Harvard Harvard Law Review important institutions interests interpretation issues judges judgments judicial review judiciary Justices justify Law Review Least Dangerous Branch Legal legislative legislature legitimate limited majority meaning ment minimalism minimalist moral norms notes opinion original particular passive political political branches popular possible practices preferences principles problem procedural public opinion question reason reflect regime represent requires response Robert role rule Senate sense social society structure substantive suggests Sunstein Supreme Court theorists tion tional tradition ultimately understanding University Press values virtues York