Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

along the forty-fifth parallel of north latitude; that, in a similar manner, colonies advanced from the same great nation by a southern line through Asia, peopling Syria and Africa, and arriving at last by sea through the Pillars of Hercules at Britain; that the languages of the western world were the same, and that one system of letters —viz. that of the Irish Druids-pervaded the whole, was common to the British Isles and Gaul, to the inhabitants of Italy, Greece, Syria, Arabia, Persia, and Hindostan; and that one of the two alphabets (of the same system) in which the Irish MSS. are written-viz. the Beth-luis-nion—came by Gaul through Britain to Ireland; and that the other— the Bobeloth- - came through the Straits of Gibraltar. Jacob Bryant thinks that the works called Cyclopean were executed at a remote age by colonies of some great original nation; the only difference between his opinion and that of Mr. Higgins being, that the latter calls them Druids, or Celts, from the time of the dispersion above alluded to.

-

12. The unhewn stones, whose antiquity and purport is the subject of this section, are found in Hindostan, where they are denominated “pandoo koolies," and are attributed to a fabulous being named Pandoo and his sons. With a similarity of character attesting their common origin, we find them in India, on the shores of the Levant and Mediterranean, in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, in France, and on the shores of Britain from the Straits of Dover to the Land's End in Cornwall, as well as in many of the interior parts of the country. They are classed as follows: 1. The single stone, pillar, or obelisk. 2. Circles of stones of different number and arrangement. 3. Sacrificial stones. 4. Cromlechs and cairns. 5. Logan stones. 6. Tolmen or colossal stones. 13. (1.) Single Stones. Passages abound in Scripture in which the practice of erecting single stones is recorded. The reader on this point may refer to Gen. xxviii. 18., Judges, ix. 6., 1 Sam. vii. 12., 2 Sam. xx. 8., Joshua, xxiv. 27. The single stone might be an emblem of the generative power of Nature, and thence an object of idolatry. That mentioned in the first scriptural reference, which Jacob set up in his journey to visit Laban, his uncle, and which he had used for his pillow, seems, whether from the vision he had while sleeping upon it, or from some other cause, to have become to him an object of singular veneration; for he set it up, and poured oil upon it, and called it “ Bethel " (the house of God). It is curious to observe that some pillars in Cornwall, assumed to have been erected by the Phonicians, still retain the appellation Bothel. At first, these stones were of no larger dimension than a man could remove, as in the instance just cited, and that of the Gilgal of Joshua (Josh. iv. 20.); but that which was set up under an oak at Shechem (ibid. xxiv. 26.), was a great stone. And here we may notice another singular coincidence, that of the Bothel in Cornwall being set up in a place which, from its proximity to an oak which was near the spot, was called Bothel-ac; the last syllable being the Saxon for an oak. It appears from the Scriptures that these single stones were raised on various occasions; sometimes, as in the case of Jacob's Bethel and of Samuel's Ebenezer, to commemorate instances of divine interposition; sometimes to record a covenant, as in the case of Jacob and Laban (Gen. xxxi. 48.); sometimes, like the Greek stela, as sepulchral stones, as in the case of Rachel's grave (Gen. xxxvi. 20.), 1700 years B.C., according to the usual reckoning. They were occasionally, also, set up to the memory of individuals, as in the instance of Absalom's pillar and others. The pillars and altars of the patriarchs appear to have been erected in honour of the only true God, Jehovah; but wherever the Canaanites appeared, they seem to have been the objects of idolatrous worship, and to have been dedicated to Baal or the sun, or the other false deities whose altars Moses ordered the Israelites to destroy. The similarity of pillars of single stones almost at the opposite sides of the earth, leaves no doubt in our mind of their being the work of a people of one common origin widely scattered; and the hypotheses of Bryant and Higgins sufficiently account for their appearance in places so remote from each other. In consequence, says the latter writer, of some cause, no matter what, the Hive, after the dispersion, casted and sent forth its swarms. One of the largest descended, according to Genesis (x. 2.), from Gomer, went north, and then west, pressed by succeeding swarms, till it arrived at the shores of the Atlantic Ocean, and ultimately colonised Britain. Another branch, observes the same author, proceeded through Sarmatia southward to the Euxine (Cimmerian Bosphorus); another to Italy, founding the states of the Umbrii and the Cimmerii, at Cuma, near Naples. Till the time of the Romans these different lines of march, like so many sheepwalks, were without any walled cities. Some of the original tribe found their way into Greece, and between the Carpathian mountains and the Alps into Gaul, scattering a few stragglers as they passed into the beautiful valleys of the latter, where traces of them in Druidical monuments and language are occasionally found. Wherever they settled, if the conjecture is correct, they employed themselves in recovering the lost arts of their ancestors.

14. To the Canaanites of Tyre and Sidon may be chiefly attributed the introduction of these primeval works into Britain. The Tyrians, inhabiting a small slip of barren land, were essentially and necessarily a commercial people, and became the most expert and adventurous sailors of antiquity. It has been supposed that the constancy of the needle to the pole," that path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture's eye hath not seen,"

was known to the Tyrians; and, indeed, it seems scarcely possible that, by the help of the stars alone, they should have been able to maintain a commerce for tin on the shores of Britain, whose western coast furnished that metal in abundance, and whose islands (the

Scilly) were known by the title of Cassiterides, or tin
islands. In this part of Britain there seems unquestion-
able evidence that they settled a colony, and were the
architects of Stonehenge, Abury, and other similar works
in the British islands. In these they might have been
assisted by that part of the swarm which reached our
shores through Gaul; or it is possible that the works in
question may be those of the latter only, of whom traces
exist in Britany at the monument of Carnac, whereof
it is computed 4000 stones still remain.
From among

the number of pillars of this kind still to be seen in England, we give (fig. 3.) that standing at Rudstone, in the east riding of Yorkshire. It is described by Drake, in his Eboracum, as "coarse rag stone or millstone grit, and its weight is computed at between 40 and 50 tons. In form (the sides being slightly concave) it approaches to an ellipse on the plan, the breadth being 5 ft. 10 in., and the thickness 2 ft. 3 in., in its general dimensions. Its height is 24 ft.; and, according to a brief account communicated to the late Mr. Pegge, in the year 1769 (Archeologia, vol. v. p. 95.), its depth underground equals its height above, as appeared from an experiment made by the late Sir William Strickland."

[graphic]

Fie. 3.

PILLAR AT RUDSTONE,

15. (2.) Circles of Stone.-The Israelites were in the habit of arranging stones to represent the twelve tribes of Israel (Exod. xxiv. 4.), and for another purpose. (Deut. xxvii. 2.) And in a circular form we find them set up by Joshua's order on the passage of the Israelites through Jordan to Gilgal (a); a word in which the radical Gal or Gil (signifying a wheel) is doubled to denote the continued repetition of the action. In this last case, Joshua made the arrangement a type of the Lord rolling away their reproach from them.

16. Though traces of this species of monument are found in various parts of the world, even in America, we shall confine our observations to those of Abury and Stonehenge, merely referring, by way of enumeration, to the places where they are to be found. Thus we mention Rolbrich in Oxfordshire, the Hurlers in Cornwall, Long Meg and her daughters in Cumberland, remains in Derbyshire, Devonshire, Dorsetshire, at Stanton Drew in Somersetshire, and in Westmoreland. They are common in Wales, and are found in the Western Isles. There are examples in Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and various parts of Germany. Clarke, in his description of the hill of Kushunlu Tepe in the Troad, observes, that all the way up, the traces of former works may be noticed, and that, on the summit, there is a small oblong area, six yards long and two broad, exhibiting vestiges of the highest antiquity; the stones forming the inclosure being as rude as those of Tiryns in Argolis, and encircled by a grove of oaks covering the top of this conical mountain. entrance is from the south. Upon the east and west, outside of the trees, are stones ranging like what we in England call Druidical circles. Three circles of stones are known in America, one of which stands upon a high rock on the banks of the river Winnipigon. The stupendous monument of Carnac in Britany, of which we have above made mention, is not of a circular form; the stones there being arranged in eleven straight lines, from 30 to 33 ft. apart, some of which are of enormous size. They are said to have formerly extended three leagues along the co..st A deser p'ion of this monument is given in vol xxii. of the Archæologia; and in Gailhabaud, Monumens, 410, Paris, 1842-52.

The

17. Abury, or Avebury, in Wiltshire, of which we give a view in a restored state (fig. 4.), is a specimen of this species of building, in which the climax of magnificence was attained. Stukely, who examined the ruins when in much better preservation than at present, says, "that the whole figure represented a snake transmitted through a circle;" and that, "to make their representation more natural, they artfully carried it over a variety of elevations and depressions, which, with the curvature of the avenues, produces sufficiently the desired effect. To make it still more elegant and picture-like, the head of the snake is carried up the southern promontory of Hackpen Hill, towards the village of West Kennet; nay, the very name of the hill is derived from this circumstance;" for acan, he observes, signifies a serpent in the Chaldaic language. Dr. S. then goes on to state, "that the dracontia was a name, amongst the first-learned nations, for the very ancient sort of temples of which they could give no account, nor well explain their meaning upon it." The figure of the serpent extended two miles in length; and but a very faint idea can now be formed of what it was in its original state. Two double circles, one to the north and the other to the south of the centre, were placed within the large circle, which formed the principal body of the serpent, and from which branched out the head to Hackpen Hill, in the direction of

[graphic]

West Kennet, as one avenue; and the other, the tail, in the direction of Beckhampton. Dr. Stukely makes the number of stones, 652 in all, as under:

[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

2

652

The large

Kennet avenue in 1722. upwards of 50 ft. in depth and between 60 and 70 ft. in width, leaving entrances open where the avenues intersected it. The colossal mound, called

66

Silbury hill," close to the Bath road, was probably connected in some way with the circle we have described, from the circumstance of the Roman road to Bath, made long afterwards, being diverted to avoid it. Dr. Owen thinks that the Abury circle was one of three primary circles in Great Britain, and that Silbury hill was the pile of Cyvrangon (heaping) characterised in the 14th Welsh triad; but the conjecture affords us no assistance in determining the people by whom the monument was raised. If it be in its arrangement intended to represent a serpent, it becomes immediately connected with ophiolatry, or serpent worship, a sin which beset the Israelites, and which would stamp it as proceeding from the central N stamen of the hypothesis on which Mr. Higgins sets out. See Observ. ations on Dracontia, by the Rev. John Bathurst Deane, Archdui. vol. xxv.

E

Fig. 5.

[ocr errors]

PLAN OF STONER ENG E.

"Eoliam Pitanen a læva parte relinquit,
Factaque de saxo longi simulacra Draconis,"-OVID, Met. vii, 357.

which is a picturesque description of Abury.

18. Stonehenge, on Salisbury Plain, about seven miles from Salisbury and two miles

to the west of Ambresbury, is certainly more artificial in its structure than Abury, and its construction may therefore be safely referred to a later date. Fig. 5. is a restored plan of this wonder of the west, as it may well be called. The larger circle is 105 feet in diameter, and between it and the interior smaller circle is a space of about 9 feet. Within this smaller circle, which is half the height (8 feet) of the exterior one, was a portion of an ellipsis formed by 5 groups of stones, to which Dr. Stukely has given the name of trilithons, because formed by two vertical and one horizontal stone: the former are from 17 to 183 feet high, the middle trilithon being the highest. Within this eliipsis is another of single stones, half the height of the trilithons. The outer circle was crowned with a course of stones similar to an architrave or epistylium, the stones whereof were let into or joggled with one another by means of egg-shaped tenons formed out of the vertical blocks. The ellipsis was connected in a similar manner. Within the inner elliptical enclosure was a block 16 ft. long, 4 ft. broad, and 20 in. thick. This has usually been called the altar stone. Round the larger circle, at the distance of 100 ft., a vallum was formed about 52 ft. in width, so that the external dimension of the work was a diameter of 420 ft. The vallum surrounding these sacred places seems to have been borrowed by the Canaanites in imitation of the enclosure with which Moses surrounded Mount Sinai, in order to prevent the multitude from approaching too near the sacred mysteries. The number of stones composing this monument is variously given. In the subjoined account we follow Dr. Stukely:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Northwards from Stonehenge, at the distance of a few hundred yards, is a large single stone, which, at the period of its being placed there, has been by some thought to have marked a meridian line from the centre of the circle.

19. Fig. 6. is a view of the present state of this interesting ruin from the west. Mr.

[graphic][merged small][subsumed]

Cunnington, in a letter to Mr. Higgins, gives the following account of the stones which remain of the monument: "The stones on the outside of the work, those comprising the outward circle as well as the large (five) trilithons, are all of that species of stone called 'sarsen' found in the neighbourhood; whereas the inner circle of small upright stones, and those of the interior oval, are composed of granite, hornstone, &c., most probably procured from some part of Devonshire or Cornwall, as I know not where such stones could be procured at a nearer distance."

20. Authors have in Stonehenge discovered an instrument of astronomy, and among them Maurice, whose view as to its founders coincides with those of the writers already cited, and with our own. We give no opinion on this point, but shall conclude the section by placing before the reader the substance of M. Bailly's notion thereon, recommending him to consult, in that respect, authorities better than we profess to be, and here expressing our own belief that the priests of ancient Britain were priests of Baal; and that the monuments, the subjects of this section, were in existence long before the Greeks, as a nation, were known, albeit they did derive the word Druid from 8pus (an oak), and said that they themselves were autoxloves (sprung from the earth).

21. M. Bailly says, on the origin of the sciences in Asia, that a nation possessed of profound wisdom, of elevated genius, and of an antiquity far superior to the Egyptians or Indians, immediately after the flood inhabited the country to the north of India, between the latitudes of 40 and 50, or about 50° north, He contends that some of the most celebrated observatories and inventions relating to astronomy, from their peculiar character, could have taken place only in those latitudes, and that arts and improvements gradually

We

travelled thence to the equator. The people to whom his description is most applicable is
the northern progeny of Brahmins, settled near the Imaus and in Northern Thibet.
add, that Mr. Hastings informed Maurice of an immemorial tradition that prevailed at
Benares, which was itself, in modern times, the grand seat of Indian learning,-that all
the learning of India came from a country situate in 40° of N. latitude. Maurice remarks.
"This is the latitude of Samarcand, the metropolis of Tartary; and, by this circumstance,
the position of M. Bailly should seem to be confirmed. This is the country where, according
to the testimony of Josephus and other historians cited by the learned Abbé Pezron, are to
be found the first Celta, by whom all the temples and caves of India were made. Higgins
observes on this, that the worship of the Mithraitic bull existed in India, Persia, Greece,
Italy, and Britain, and that the religion of the Druids, Magi, and Brahmins was the same.
22. (3.) Sacrificial Stones. These have been confounded with the cromlech, but the
difference between them is wide. They are simple stones, either encircled by a shallow
trench (vallum) and bank (agger), or by a few stones. Upon these alınost all authors
concur in believing that human immolation was practised; indeed, the name blod, or
blood-stones, which they bear in the north of Europe, seems to point to their infernal use.
We do not think it necessary to pursue further inquiry into them, as they present no
remarkable nor interesting features.

23. (4.) Cromlechs and Cairns. The former of these seem to stand in the same relation to the large circles that the modern cell does to the conventual church of the Catholics. They consist of two or more sides, or vertical stones, and sometimes a back stone, the whole being covered with one not usually placed exactly horizontal, but rather in an inclining

[blocks in formation]

position. We here (fig. 7.) give

a representation of one, that
has received the name of Kit's
Cotty House, which lies on the
road between Maidstone and
Rochester, about a mile north-
eastward froin Aylesford church,
and is thus described in the
Beauties of England and Wales.
It is composed of four huge
stones unwrought, three of them
standing on end but inclined in.
wards, and supporting the fourth,
which lies transversely over

66

them, so as to leave an open recess beneath. The dimensions and computed weights of these
stones are as follows: - height of that on the south side 8 ft., breadth 74 ft., thickness 2 ft.,
weight 8 tons; height of that on the north side 7 ft., breadth 7 ft., thickness 2 ft.,
weight 8 tons. The middle stone is very irregular; its medium length as well as breadth
may be about 5 ft., its thickness about 1 ft. 2 in., and its weight about 2 tons.
The upper
stone or impost is also extremely irregular; its greatest length is nearly 12 ft., and its
breadth about 9 ft.; its thickness is 2 ft., and its weight about 10 tons: the width of the
recess at bottom is 9 ft., and at top 7 ft.; from the ground to the upper side of the covering
stone is 9 ft. These stones are of the kind called Kentish rag. Many years ago there was
a single stone of a similar kind and size to those forming the cromlech, about 70 yards to
the north-west: this, which is thought to have once stood upright, like a pillar, has been
broken into pieces and carried away." Another cromlech stood in the neighbourhood,
which has been thrown down. The nonsense that has been gravely written upon this
and similar monuments is scarcely worth mention. It will hardly be believed that there
existed people who thought it was the sepulchral monument of king Catigern, from similarity
of name, and others who consider it the grave of the Saxon chief, Horsa, from its proximity
to Horsted. Cromlechs are found in situations remote indeed, a specimen being seated on
the Malabar coast; and in the British isles they are so numerous, that we do not think
it necessary to give a list of them.

24. The cairn or carn which we have in this section coupled with the cromlech, perhaps improperly, is a conical heap of loose stones. Whether its etymology be that of Rowland, from the words 737 (kern-ned), a coped heap, we shall, from too little skill in Hebrew, not venture to decide; so we do not feel quite sure that, as has been asserted, they were raised over the bodies of deceased heroes and chieftains. Our notion rather inclines to their having been a species of altar, though the heap of stones to which Jacob gave the name of Galeed, if it were of this species, was rather a memorial of the agreement between him and Laban. It can scarcely be called an architectural work; but we should have considered our notice of the earlier monuments of antiquity incomplete without naming the cairn.

25. (5.) Logan or Rocking Stones. These were large blocks poised so nicely on the points of rocks, that a small force applied to them produced oscillation. The weight of the celebrated one in Cornwall, which is granite, has been computed at upwards of 90 tons.

.

[graphic]
« ZurückWeiter »