Law at the End of Life: The Supreme Court and Assisted Suicide
Carl E. Schneider, Carl Schneider, Professor of Law and Internal Medicine Carl E Schneider
University of Michigan Press, 2000 - 369 Seiten
We live in a world in which courts crucially shape public policy through constitutional adjudication. This is a book written for that world. It brings together a group of distinguished scholars from many disciplines to examine the Supreme Court's recent decision that statutes prohibiting doctors from helping their patients commit suicide may be constitutional. It offers a guide to that decision and to the larger issues it raises for citizens and scholars alike. It asks everyone's first question: What does the decision mean for today and tomorrow? It asks the lawyer's question: Is the Supreme Court's reasoning clear and convincing? It asks the doctor's question: How will the decision affect the decisions physicians make with their patients? It asks the ethicist's question: Will the decision conduce to wise and just decisions at the end of life? It asks the historian's question: How are we to understand the Court's work in light of our disturbing national experience with euthanasia? Ultimately, it asks the questions citizens need to ask in our new world: Is constitutional adjudication a good way to make public policy? Are courts well equipped--with experience, with doctrine, with wisdom--to make good policy? What role should courts have in making policy in a democracy? Has the Supreme Court made good public policy? What is the right policy for law at the end of life?
Carl Schneider is Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
The Road to Glucksberg
An Analysis of the Supreme
On the Meaning and Impact of the PhysicianAssisted
Glucksberg and the Institutions of Public Policy
Making Biomedical Policy through Constitutional
Eugenic Euthanasia in Early TwentiethCentury
Assisted Suicide and the Challenge of Individually
Bioethics in the Language
Appendixes Compassion in Dying v Washington
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
abortion active American applied argued argument assisted suicide authority autonomy believe cause challenge Chief choice cited claim collective commit suicide competent concerns concurring considered constitutional criminal Cruzan death debate decide decisions determining discussion doctors due process dying effect ethical euthanasia example existence experience fact Force Glucksberg hasten human Ibid important individual issue Journal judges judicial Justice killing legislative liberty interest limited lives means Medicine Michigan moral O'Connor one's opinion pain palliative patients permit person physician-assisted suicide physicians political practice Press preventing principle problem prohibiting protected question Quill rational reason recognize refuse regulation requires response result rules S.Ct Second seems social society Souter state's statute Stevens suffering suggest Supreme Court terminally ill terminally ill patients tion treatment United University Washington wish York