Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1952 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 86
Seite 119
... entitled to under this right was only $ 1,000 . In that year the amount was changed . Instead of raising the $ 1,000 to a flat sum or some other amount , the Legislature gave her the choice of taking the $ 1,000 or a refund of the ...
... entitled to under this right was only $ 1,000 . In that year the amount was changed . Instead of raising the $ 1,000 to a flat sum or some other amount , the Legislature gave her the choice of taking the $ 1,000 or a refund of the ...
Seite 362
... entitled to one - half thereof ; 2. The defendant failed , refused and neglected to deliver to the plaintiff household effects and personal property and that the value thereof was the sum of $ 250 ; 3. The Central Valley Cooperative Gin ...
... entitled to one - half thereof ; 2. The defendant failed , refused and neglected to deliver to the plaintiff household effects and personal property and that the value thereof was the sum of $ 250 ; 3. The Central Valley Cooperative Gin ...
Seite 388
... entitled to deductions of the entire amounts distributed to its mem- bers . The court held , in effect , that these ... entitled to receive $ 510 per month . Therefore , it contended , members should receive no less . As to this argument ...
... entitled to deductions of the entire amounts distributed to its mem- bers . The court held , in effect , that these ... entitled to receive $ 510 per month . Therefore , it contended , members should receive no less . As to this argument ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
accident action affirmed agreement alleged Am.Jur amended amount Appeal and Error appellant appellant's attorney automobile Betty bookmakers Cal.App Cal.Jur cause charged claim Code Civ community property concurred constitute contends contract contributory negligence corporation corroboration counsel crime Criminal Law damages decedent deed defendant defendant's district duty Edmund G entitled evidence fact fendant filed finding granted guilty hearing Homn husband inference injury instruction intent issue joint tenancy Judge judgment June June 11 jury KDON lease Los Angeles County mandamus ment motion order denying paid Palermo parties payment person petition petitioner plaintiff pleaded premises prior probate prosecution question reasonable record References Respondent rule sales tax Second Dist statute Superior Court supra sustained Talle tenants testified testimony tion told trial court trust unlawful detainer verdict violation wife witness writ