Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 77
Seite 217
... question is certainly ex abrupto under the circumstances of the examination . No prefatory question or remarks of counsel shed any light on it . Its language is general , specifying neither the particular treatment nor the particular ...
... question is certainly ex abrupto under the circumstances of the examination . No prefatory question or remarks of counsel shed any light on it . Its language is general , specifying neither the particular treatment nor the particular ...
Seite 499
... questions would be answered in the affirmative . [ 36 ] The question as to whether defendant was making a delivery for Mr. Cole was not objected to by defendant . What we have heretofore said concerning the applicable principles where ...
... questions would be answered in the affirmative . [ 36 ] The question as to whether defendant was making a delivery for Mr. Cole was not objected to by defendant . What we have heretofore said concerning the applicable principles where ...
Seite 506
... question : " [ H ] ave you ever heard of the reputation of the defend- ant ? " , whereupon the district attorney interposed an ob- jection . Worded in this form the question was improper as calling for hearsay . Without ruling on the ...
... question : " [ H ] ave you ever heard of the reputation of the defend- ant ? " , whereupon the district attorney interposed an ob- jection . Worded in this form the question was improper as calling for hearsay . Without ruling on the ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
33 Cal.Rptr affidavit affirmed alleged Am.Jur amend Angeles appellant's application arrest bank Bank of America Cal.App California charged checks claim Code Civ Code section complaint constitute contends contract contributory negligence conviction corporation counsel County crime Criminal Law damages declaration deed Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's demurrer determine dismissal Dist district attorney employee employment error escrow evidence fact fendant filed granted guilty hearing highway inference injury intent issue jury liability Los Angeles County marijuana matter ment motion narcotics objection October 23 offense officers order denying parties Penal Code person petition petitioner Plaintiff and Respondent prior proceeding prosecution question reasonable record References request res ipsa loquitur reversed robbery rule Searches and Seizures Stanley Mosk statement statute subrogation summary judgment Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge vehicle verdict violation witness