... no philologer could examine the Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin, without believing them to have been sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists. The Universal Instructor, Or, Self-culture for All. [With Illustrations and ... - Seite 45von Ward, Lock and co, ltd - 1884Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
| Edward Royall Tyler, William Lathrop Kingsley, George Park Fisher, Timothy Dwight - 1858 - 956 Seiten
...European world the connection of the Arian languages one with another, saying that " no philologer could examine the Sanskrit, Greek and Latin, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which perhaps no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though not... | |
| Benjamin Woodbridge Dwight - 1859 - 384 Seiten
...European world the connection of the Arian languages one with another, saying, that "no philologer could examine the Sanskrit, Greek and Latin, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which perhaps no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though not... | |
| 1861 - 516 Seiten
...link which united them all. Consequently Sir William Jones, who died in 1794, writes: "No philologer could examine the Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin without believing them to have sprung from gome common source, which perhaps no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though not... | |
| Friedrich Max Müller - 1861 - 420 Seiten
...refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a strong affinity. " No philologer," he writes, " could examine the Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though... | |
| Samuel Orchart Beeton - 1861 - 904 Seiten
...Even previous to the year 1794, the great orientalist Sir AVilliam Jones declared that no philosopher could examine the Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin, without believing them to have sprung from one common source ; and, says Max Müller, " as sore as the six Roman dialects point to... | |
| 1861 - 512 Seiten
...link which united them all. Consequently Sir William Jones, who died in 1794, writes: "No philologer could examine the Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which perhaps no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though not... | |
| Friedrich Max Müller - 1862 - 454 Seiten
...refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a strong affinity. " No philologer," he writes, " could examine the Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though... | |
| 1868 - 600 Seiten
...possibly have been produced by accident ; so strong indeed, that no philologer could examine all three, without believing them to have sprang from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists." — Ariana Autiqua, p. 122 &c. Our anthor thinks it difficult to conceive of the argument respecting... | |
| Ethnographic atlas - 1870 - 56 Seiten
...European world the connection of the Arian languages one with another, saying, that "no philologer could examine the Sanskrit, Greek and Latin, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which perhaps no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though not... | |
| 1873 - 876 Seiten
...exquisitely refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a strong affinity. " No philologer," he adds, " could examine the Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though... | |
| |