Human Rights: Group Defamation, Freedom of Expression, and the Law of Nations
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998 - 319 Seiten
In his book "Human Rights: Group Defamation, Freedom of Expression and the Law of Nations," Thomas David Jones presents a discussion and analysis of the laws governing group defamation and speech inciteful of racial hatred in Great Britain, Canada, India, Nigeria, and the United States. Although there exists no federal group defamation law in the United States, a few state legislatures have promulgated group defamation statutes, while a cause of action for group defamation has been recognized as justiciable in the decision law of other states. Mr Jones describes his theory as constitutional minimalism because he does not advocate the legal proscription of all derogatory hate speech. Only the sub-category of hate speech that fulfills the standard elements of proof found in common law defamation claim will be prosecuted criminally by the federal government. The author further asserts that a carefully and narrowly drafted federal criminal group defamation statute will pass constitutional muster without creating a conflict with First Amendment rights.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Freedom of Expression in International
The First Amendment
Racial Defamation the First Amendment and
The Right to Equal Concern and Respect
action African African-Americans allowed Amendment American attempt Beauharnais Black called cause Charter civil Committee concept concerning conduct Constitution Convention convicted Countries created crime criminal critical cultural decision defamatory defendant effect equality ethnic existence fact federal fighting force free speech freedom of expression fundamental group defamation Hate held Human Rights ideas important incitement individual intent interest International Law Italy June Justice language legislation libel limited majority matter means minorities nature norm offence opinion organizations parties peace person political position Post present principle Professor prohibited promote propaganda prosecution protection provides Public Order published punished race Racial Discrimination racial hatred reason referred Relations religious Report reprinted Republic result rule Sambo social society specific statement statute supra note Supreme Court term theory truth United United Nations University utterance values violation violence World writes