Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1962 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 73
Seite 409
... positions did not bear like titles . For example , it appears that the council determined that the positions in the five guide cities designated as fireman and hoseman were comparable to the position designated as fireman by the ...
... positions did not bear like titles . For example , it appears that the council determined that the positions in the five guide cities designated as fireman and hoseman were comparable to the position designated as fireman by the ...
Seite 412
... position of patrolman and fireman ; and strenuously ob- ject to the consideration given by the defendant city to the position of parking control officer . They support their conten- tion by reference to the fact that the position of ...
... position of patrolman and fireman ; and strenuously ob- ject to the consideration given by the defendant city to the position of parking control officer . They support their conten- tion by reference to the fact that the position of ...
Seite 414
... position " as used in the controversial charter phrase under consideration means Position - 1 , i.e. , classification P - 1 . We are in accord with this conclusion . Paragraph FIRST of section 186 , which deals with the classification ...
... position " as used in the controversial charter phrase under consideration means Position - 1 , i.e. , classification P - 1 . We are in accord with this conclusion . Paragraph FIRST of section 186 , which deals with the classification ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
18 Cal.Rptr affidavit affirmed agreed agreement alleged Am.Jur amended amount Angeles appellant's application attachment attorney award boundary Brotsky Cal.App cause of action charter City Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint contention contract conviction counsel crime Criminal Law cross-examination damages deed Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's determine discretion dismiss Dist eminent domain employees evidence fact favor filed findings Gould granted guardian ad litem hearing instructions issue judge judgment jury ment Middlecoff motion negligence officer partnership party in interest payment person petition petitioner petitioner's plaintiff Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent police prior probation Proc proceedings prosecution question quiet title real party real property reasonable record request Rose Wilson rule San Bernardino Stanley Mosk statute Steiner subd Superior Court supra testified testimony thereof tion trial court trust verdict witnesses writ