Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1940 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 80
Seite 166
... favor of an order granting new trial , and the burden is on the appellant to show error . [ 4 ] Id . Scope and Extent of Review - Grounds of Decision Be- low - Order Granting New Trial - Effect of Amendment of 1919 - Grant of New Trial ...
... favor of an order granting new trial , and the burden is on the appellant to show error . [ 4 ] Id . Scope and Extent of Review - Grounds of Decision Be- low - Order Granting New Trial - Effect of Amendment of 1919 - Grant of New Trial ...
Seite 167
... favor of defendant Souza , and in favor of plaintiffs against Ethel Ewing and Audrey Bates in the sum of $ 1500 . These two last mentioned defendants moved for a new trial , and plain- tiffs moved for a new trial against all defendants ...
... favor of defendant Souza , and in favor of plaintiffs against Ethel Ewing and Audrey Bates in the sum of $ 1500 . These two last mentioned defendants moved for a new trial , and plain- tiffs moved for a new trial against all defendants ...
Seite 188
... favor of plaintiffs after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for false arrest and false imprisonment , defendant Matthews appeals . This case was formerly before us upon an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant ...
... favor of plaintiffs after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for false arrest and false imprisonment , defendant Matthews appeals . This case was formerly before us upon an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant ...
Inhalt
Wood J and McComb J concurred | 19 |
Appellants petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court | 37 |
was denied on February 13 1941 | 138 |
Urheberrecht | |
1 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
accident affirmed agreement alleged amended complaint Angeles County Appeal and Error appellant's attorney authority automobile bank California California Highway Patrol cause of action charge City Civil Procedure claim Code of Civil commission Company concurred contention contract contributory negligence Corporation Court was denied cross-complaint damages decedent decree defendant defendant's demurrer dence determined dismissed duty Earl Warren employee entitled evidence fact favor fendant filed finding ground hearing highway injury instruction issue Judge judgment jurisdiction jury lease lessee liability Los Angeles County ment motion negligence nonsuit notice officer order denying parties payment person petition petitioner plaintiff pleading prior probation proceeding question quiet title reasonable record References respondent respondent's reversed rule Second Appellate District statute sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony thereof tion trial court trust Ventura Boulevard verdict witness writ