 | William Blackstone - 1800 - 680 Seiten
...fuch due notice, from all actions brought upon the bill; with this exception, if the holder can prove that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the drawee when the bill was difhonoured, he may flill recover againft the drawer, though he omitted to give him... | |
 | Edward Christian - 1801 - 284 Seiten
...fuch due notice,from alt actions brought upon the bill; with this exception, if the holder can prove that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the drawee when the bill was difhonourcd, he may fbill recover againft the drawer, though he omitted to give him... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore - 1818 - 636 Seiten
...the note in case of default by the maker. Although in Bicterdite v. Eollman (3), it was held, that if the drawer had no effects in the hands of the drawee from the time the bill was drawn, it was not necessary to give him notice of its dishonour; still, in Qaridge v. Da/tttn (c), Mr. Justice... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1818 - 892 Seiten
...given to all the parties to whom the bolder ot giv«a. the bill means to resort for payment, and though proof that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the acceptor will be an excuse for want of notice with respect to him, it will not have that operation... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1822 - 600 Seiten
...protest ' itself; but if he be at home, it is easy for him to ascertain that fact by making inquiry." Proof that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the Notice when drawee, dispenses with notice of the dishonour ( 1 ) ; or, to speak Jftfor premore correctly,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, William Pyle Taunton - 1823 - 942 Seiten
...default of payment by the maker. It is true, that, in Bickerdike v. Bottman (c\ it was held, that if the drawer had no effects in the hands of the drawee, from the time the bill was drawn, it was not necessary to give the drawer notice of the dishonour of the bill 5 but Ije Blartc 3. in... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1823 - 554 Seiten
...itself; but if he be at home, it is easy for him to ascertain that fact by making inquiry." itice of dis- Proof that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the ' ° ' drawee, dispenses with notice of the dishonoured) or, to speak more correctly, notice will be dispensed with,... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1826 - 710 Seiten
...all Sthly. To "° the parties to whom the holder of the bill means to resort for payment, and though proof that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the£". ™u§t acceptor will be an excuse for want of notice with respect so him, it will not have that operation... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (3rd Circuit), Bushrod Washington - 1826 - 620 Seiten
...either state that the bill was protested, or show that it was not incumbent on him to protest ; as, that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the drawee ; but, the omission Raker rx. Gallagher. can only be taken advantage of by special demurrer. 1 Salk.... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1829 - 532 Seiten
...in the hands oj the drawee.] It is no answer to the want of notice in an action against an indorsee, that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the drawee. Thus where in such an action, the plaintiff's counsel offered to show that the drawee had no effects... | |
| |
... that the drawer had no effects in the hands of the drawee from the time the bill was drawn till the time it became due, he is liable, without proof of demand and notice. 
