 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1810 - 756 Seiten
...third perfoa ; then it is the hunter's." Lord ELLENBOROUGH CJ The queftion is, whether the plaintiff 's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after...another's ground ? And if there be any precedent of that fort, which outrages all reafon and fenfe, it is of no authority to govern other cafes. Thrre is no... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1812 - 760 Seiten
...ground of a third person, then it is the hunter's."Lord Ellenborough, CJ The question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason O) Cro. Jac.... | |
 | Thomas Burgeland Johnson - 1817 - 324 Seiten
...the question is, Whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a bare in another's ground ? And if there be any precedent...other cases. There is no question here as to the right of the game. The gamekeeper had no light to kill the plaintiff's dog for following it. The plea does... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1817 - 776 Seiten
...Bailey, per Duller, J. So- II Eat 1, 568. Ellenborough, CJ observing, " The question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground ? There is no question here as to the right to the game. The gamekeeper had no right to kill the plaintiff's... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1817 - 782 Seiten
...Buller,J. So- 1 1 East, 56s. Ellen-borough, CJ observing, " The question is, whether the plaintiffs dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground ? There is no question here as to the right to the game. The gamekeeper had no right to kill the plaintiff's... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore - 1818 - 636 Seiten
...forcibly to the proposition I am now maintaining. His lordship says, ' The question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for...other cases. There is no question here as to the right of the game. The gamekeeper had no right to kill the plaintiff's dog for following it : the plea does... | |
 | Richard Burn - 1820 - 880 Seiten
...demurrer; and after argument, Lord Ellenborough, C. 3. said, The question is, whether the plaintiff's <l'>g incurred the penalty of death for running after a...reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other case«. There is no question here as to the right of the game. The gamekeeper had no right to kill... | |
 | Richard Burn - 1830 - 1078 Seiten
...there was a demurrer : and after argument, Lord Ellenborough CJsaid, — The question is, Whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for...other cases. There is no question here as to the right of the game. The gamekeeper had no right to kill the plaintiff's dog for following it. The plea does... | |
 | Charles Petersdorff - 1831 - 542 Seiten
...Ellenborough, mast ap CJ , observing, " The question is, whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the pear in the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground? There is noPleadlnes question here us to the right to the game. The game-keeper had no right toVat... | |
 | James Ram - 1835 - 162 Seiten
...where a defendant's gamekeeper had shot a dog of the plaintiff, and the question was, "whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground;" Lord Ellenborough forcibly said, — " If there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason... | |
| |
The question is, Whether the plaintiff's dog incurred the penalty of death for running after a hare in another's ground ? And if there be any precedent of that sort, which outrages all reason and sense, it is of no authority to govern other cases. 
