Abbildungen der Seite

ing: loving, and disliking objects, are volitions If they have not, then their argument amounts to nothing, and the miud may be free in willing, although choosing, loving and disliking objects, are effects produced by motives, or external objects. Let Calvinists prove if they can, that willing is the same exercise, as choosing, loving, or disliking objects, and then they will silence every person, who contends for the liberty of the mind in willing. By asserting, these exercises are alike, does not make them so; proof is required, and if not produced, men will believe they are free agents in spite of overy exercise scheme, that can be invented they will believe what they feel, and it is impossible to reason them out of their senses, without clear evidence. But willing, choosing, loving and disliking, are not alike; the first is an exercise of the willy and the mind is always free in it; but choosing, loving, and disliking objects, are exercises of the affections, and in these, the mind has no liberty or freedown, when objects so operate on the mind, as to produce them. On the whole, I believe Calvinists ought to concede, that the mind is free in willing, and that volitions are not effects.

I also believe, that Arminians ought to agree with Calvinists, that the human heart is naturally depraved, and must be renewed by the power of ibe Holy Ghost to be happy.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

V. The reader may exclaiın the author is a confirmed Arminian, It is not so, he has from his youth up associated with Calvinists, and believed in the scriptural doctrines, which their clergy have taughts but he has never believed in their metaphysics which deny the free agency of man and consequent. ly his accountableness to God for his actions. It is these inetaphysics, the author would correct, and if his reasoning be weak, or fallacious, the candid reader is requested to attribute it to the limitation of the mental powers and faculties of the autlior. He has done what he could to prove that the human mind is free in willing, and if he has failed, 80 be it, others lave failed before him.

But the Author apprehends, that there are per sons, who will try to misconstrue his arguments, and render tliem ridiculous to support some favour: ite exercise scheme of their own.

With such persons he will avoid controversy; if they feel exercised, he is willing they should be. But he would have them remember, that others have a right to believe, and will believe, they are free agents.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

In addition to the errors of the press

mentions ed in page 12th, the reader is requested to correct the following: Page. Line. Words. 67 8 an, read any.

12 proof, read prool's. 119 5 impowered, read empowered. 151 3 might omitted; read might have

omitted. 158 15 searchest, read searcheth.

16 understandest, read understandeth. 174 21 proof, read proofs. 183 1 opperations, read operations.

« ZurückWeiter »