Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

as far as they throw light upon the colonial policy of Great Britain.

Original sources of information in the debates in Parliament, Reports of Committees, and official documents in public offices and in the British Museum, have invariably been resorted to where necessary; yet the author has not been unmindful of the current opinions of the day in well-informed circles, both commercial and political, on the many controverted questions, Imperial and colonial, here referred to.

The writer has tried to compress into as small a compass as possible the great number and variety of facts connected with colonial history in ancient and modern times, which he has found it necessary to introduce; but for the purpose of illustrating other points, he has sometimes preferred to repeat a reference rather than to multiply quotations.

The question between England and her colonies ought not to be one of separation but of sounder relations, as alike the interest of both, and the interest of good government throughout the world.

In conclusion the author has the pleasing duty of tendering his thanks to those gentlemen, in and out of the public offices, who have so politely aided him in his researches.

LONDON: 1865.

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER I.

GOVERNMENT OF THE FIRST ENGLISH COLONIES.

First permanent English settlement in America, Virginia-The
two centres of American colonization, Virginia and New
England, differing in their origin and their development-First
representative body in America: its composition-A written
constitution the model for others-The governor: how ap-
pointed-General assembly, courts of justice, corporation
dissolved (1624)-First settlers in New England: the origin
and character of their government-Plymouth Colony: their
charter, its loss-New charter by James I. (1620)-Bound-
aries of New England-Charter from Charles I. (1628)-
Massachusetts: its government, how elected-Court for the
transaction of business-Four general assemblies-No refer-
ence to religious questions-First church-Oath of supremacy
-Charter removed to New England (1629) - Growth of colony
-Struggle between the Crown and colony-Loss of charter
(1684) Pure democracy-Representative government not
provided for in charter-One house only, then two-From
1684 to 1691 without a charter-One granted by William and
Mary (1691) to Massachusetts-Bay: extent, nature of, en-
larged powers: less democratic-Blackstone's division of

colonies-Provincial, proprietary, and charter governments—
Definition-States which had them-Omnipotence of parlia-
ment, and municipal character of colonial governments—
Difference in governments of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and
Rhode Island

1-11

[ocr errors]

COLONIAL GOVERNMENTS, ANCIENT AND MODERN.

Nature of first charters and character of colonists-Parliament
no control of Virtually independent-Established representa-
tive governments-Repealed common and statute laws-
Repudiated Acts o Parliament passed expressly to bind them
-Authority of King Charles's commissioners disputed-
Charters not surrendered—Attempt to transplant Church and
State-Rhode Island and Connecticut: nature of their govern-
ments Self-made, well-governed communities-Contrast with

British provinces in North America: their settlement, acquisi-
tion, government, &c.-Responsible government in Canada,
struggle for-Edmund Burke-English statesmen : their
policy-Lord John Russell's despatch (1839) on responsible
government-Adderley's comments on-Style of argument in

Russell's despatch-Interference with internal policy of colo-
nies inconsistent with despatch of Lord Glenelg (1839)-
Disallowance of colonial Acts-Parliament would not legislate
for colonies, nor allow colonies to legislate for themselves-
New Brunswick Bounties-Differential duties-Canadian
tariff-Tormenting policy-Responsible government conceded
to Canada (1846)--To maritime provinces from 1847-52—
To Australia in 1856-Simple yet powerful remedy for colo-
nial discontents: its effect
36-46

:

POLICY OF THE MOTHER COUNTRY.

Lessons taught in colonial history-Blunder in government of
old colonies: its effect-No rigid rule in colonial government
-Each colony must be treated on its own merits-Differ
widely-Their population, Anglo-Saxon or mixed, dangers

« ZurückWeiter »