Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

But others there were who thought hades or infernus was never taken in the Scriptures for any place of happiness;* and therefore they did not conceive the souls of the patriarchs or the prophets did pass into any such infernal place; and consequently, that the descent into hell was not his going to the prophets or the patriarchs, which were not there. For as, if it had been only said that Christ had gone unto the bosom of Abraham, or to paradise, no man would ever have believed that he had descended into hell; so that, being it is only written, "Thou shalt not leave my soul in hell," it seems incongruous to think that he went then unto the patriarchs who were not there.

[ocr errors]

Now this being the diversity of opinions anciently in respect of the persons unto whose souls the soul of Christ descended at his death, the difference of the end or efficacy of that descent is next to be observed. Of those who did believe the name of Hades to belong unto that general place which comprehended all the souls of men (as well those who died in the favour of God, as those who departed in their sins), some of them thought that Christ descended to that place of Hades, where the souls of all the faithful, from the death of the righteous Abel to the death of Christ, were detained;† and κᾶς συνθλάσω, καὶ μοχλοὺς σιδηροῦς συντρίψω, καὶ ἀνοίξω θησαυροὺς σκοτεινούς, ἀποκρύφους, ἀοράτους ἀναδείξω σοι· τὸν ᾅδην οὕτω καλῶν. Εἰ γὰρ καὶ ᾅδης ἦν, ἀλλὰ ψυχὰς ἐκράτει ἁγίας, καὶ σκεύη τίμια, τὸν ̓Αβραὰμ, τὸν Ἰσαάκ, τὸν Ιακώβ· διὸ καὶ θησαυροὺς ἐκάλεσε. This doctrine was maintained by all those who believed that the soul of Samuel was raised by the witch of Endor: for though he were so great a prophet, yet they thought that he was in bades; and not only so, but under the power of Satan. Thus Justin Martyr in his Dialogue with Trypho, p. 333. Paiveται δὲ καὶ ὅτι πᾶσαι αἱ ψυχαὶ τῶν οὕτως δικαίων καὶ προφητῶν ὑπὸ ἐξουσίαν ἔπιπτον τῶν τοιούτων δυνάμεων, ὁποῖα δὲ καὶ ἐν ἐγγαστριμύθῳ ἐκείνῃ ἐξ αὐτῶν πραγμάτων ὁμολογεῖται. Who was followed in this by Origen, Anastasius, Antiochenus, and others.

[merged small][ocr errors]

mihi occurrit inferos alicubi in bono posuisse Scripturam, dumtaxat Canonicam. Ibid. Non facile alicubi Scripturarum inferorum nomen positum invenitur in bono. Epist. 57. al. 187. §. 6. 'Præsertim quia ne ipsos quidem inferos uspiam Scripturarum in bono appellatos potui reperire. Quod si nusquam in divinis auctoritatibus legitur, non utique sinus ille Abrahæ, id est, secrete cujusdam quietis habitatio, aliqua pars inferorum fuisse credenda est. Quanquam in his ipsis tanti Magistri verbis, ubi ait dixisse Abraham, Inter vos et nos chaos magnum firmatum est, satis, ut opinor, appareat, non esse quandam partem quasi membrum inferorum tantæ illius felicitatis sinum. Epist. 99. al. 164. §. 7.

+ This is the opinion generally received in the Schools, and delivered as the sense of the Church of God in all ages: but though it were not so general as the schoolmen would persuade us, yet it is certain that many of the fathers did so understand it. ̔Ο μὲν ἐπὶ σωτηρίᾳ τῶν ἐν ᾅδου ψυχῶν παρῄει, ἐκ μακρῶν αἰώνων τὴν ἄφιξιν αὐτ тоυ жερμevovowv. Euseb. de Demonstrat. 1. x. c. 8. Karñ\dev eis à kaταχθόνια, ἵνα κᾀκεῖθεν λυτρώσηται τοὺς dukalovç. Cyril. Catech. iv. §. 8. "Hμɛλλe γὰρ ἡ Θεότης τελειοῦν τὰ πάντα τὰ κατὰ

امر

there dissolving all the power by which they were detained below, translated them into a far more glorious place, and eştated them in a condition far more happy in the heavens above.

[ocr errors]

Others of them understood no such translation of place, or alteration of condition there, conceiving that the souls of all men are detained below still,* and shall not enter into heaven μυστήριον τοῦ πάθους, καὶ σὺν τῇ ψυχῇ fectus autem omnis erit sicut magiκατελθεῖν εἰς τὰ καταχθόνια, ἐπὶ τὸ ἐρ- ster ejus. Quomodo ergo magister γάσασθαι τὴν ἐκεῖ τῶν προκεκοιμημένων noster non statim evolans abiit, sed σωτηρίαν, φημὶ τῶν ἁγίων πατριαρχῶν. sustinens defnitum a Patre resurreTranslatus erat Enoch, raptus Elias: ctionis suæ tempus,(quod et per Jonam sed non est servus supra Dominum. manifestum est) post triduum resurNullus enim ascendit in cœlum, nisi qui gens assumptus est; sic et nos sustidescendit de cœlo. Nam ét Moysen, nere debemus definitum a Deo resurlicet corpus ejus non apparuerit in rectionis nostræ tempus prænunciaterris, nusquam tamen in gloria coe- tum a Prophetis, et sic resurgentes lesti legimus, nisi postquam Dominus assumi, quotquot Dominus hoc dignos suæ resurrectionis pignore vincula sol- habuerit.' Adv. Hæres. 1. v. c. 26. vit inferni, et piorum animas elevavit.' Tertullian followeth Irenæus in this S. Ambros. 1. iv. de Fide ad Gratia- particular: 'Habes et regionem innum, c. 1. Qui in eo loco detine- feram subterraneam credere et illos bantur sancti, vinculorum solutionem cubito pellere, qui satis superbe non in Christi adventu sperabant. Nemo putent animas fidelium inferis dignas, enim ab inferni sedibus liberatur nisi servi super Dominum et discipuli super Christi gratiam. Eo igitur post per magistrum, aspernati si forte in mortem Christus descendit. Ut An- Abrahæ sinu exspectandæ resurrectigelus in caminum Babylonis ad tres onis solatium carpere.' De Anim. c.55. pueros liberandos descendit, ita Chri- 'Nulli patet coelum, terra adhuc salva, stus ad fornacem descendit inferni, in ne dixerim clausa. Cum transactione quo clause justorum animæ teneban- enim mundi reserabuntur regna cœtur. Postquam eo descendit, infero- lorum.' Ibid. Eam itaque regionem rum claustra perfodit, diripuit, vasta sinum dico Abrahæ, etsi non coelevit, spoliavit, vinctas inde animas li- stem, sublimiorem tamen inferis, inberando.' S. Hier. in Ecclesiasten. terim refrigerium præbituram animabus justorum, donec consummatio rerum resurrectionem omnium plenitude mercedis expungat. Adv. Marcion. l. iv. c. 34. 'Omnes ergo animæ penes inferos? Inguis. Velis et nolis, et supplicia jam illic et refrigeria habes, pauperem et divitem. Cur enim non putes animam et puniri et foveri in inferis, interim sub exspectatione utriusque judicii in quadam usurpatione et candida ejus?' De Anima, c. 58. St. Hilary, in his Commentary upon these words of the Psalm, Dominus custodiet et introitum tuum et exitum tuum ex hoc et usque in seculum: Non enim temporis hujus et seculi est ista custodia, non aduri sole atque luna, et ab omni malo conservari; sed futuri boni exspectatio est, cum exeuntes de corpore ad introitum illum regni coelestis per custodiam Domini fideles omnes reservabuntur, in sinu scilicet interim Abrahæ collocati, quo adire impios

* Justin Martyr in his Dialogue with Trypho first begins: 'AXà pèv οὐδὲ ἀποθνήσκειν φημὶ πάσας τὰς ψυχὰς ἐγὼ (ἕρμαιον γὰρ ἦν ὡς ἀληθῶς τοῖς κακοῖς)· ἀλλὰ τί ; τὰς μὲν εὐσεβῶν ἐν κρείττονί ποι χώρῳ μένειν, τὰς δὲ ἀδίκους καὶ πονηρὰς ἐν χείρονι, τὸν τῆς κρίσεως ἐκdexoμevas xpórov TÓTE. p. 223. After him Irenæus: Cum Dominus in me dio umbræ mortis abierit, ubi animi mortuorum erant, post deinde corporaliter resurrexit, et post resurrectionem assumptus est; manifestum est quia et discipulorum ejus, propter quos et hæc operatus est Dominus, animæ abibunt in invisibilem locum definitum eis a Deo, et ibi usque ad resurrectionem commorabuntur, sustinentes resurrectionem; post recipientes corpora et perfecte resurgentes, hoc est, corporaliter, quemadmodum et Dominus resurrexit, sic venient in conspectum Dei. Nemo enim est discipulus super magistrum: per

[ocr errors]

until the general resurrection. They made no such distinction at the death of Christ, as if those which believed in a Saviour to come should be kept out of heaven till he came, and those which now believe in the same Saviour already come, should be admitted thither immediately upon their expiration.

But such as thought the place in which the souls of the patriarchs did reside could not in propriety of speech be called hell, nor was ever so named in the Scriptures, conceived, that as our Saviour went to those who were included in the proper hell, or place of torment, so the end of his descent was to deliver souls from those miseries which they felt, and to translate them to a place of happiness and a glorious condition. They which did think that hell was wholly emptied, that every soul was presently released from all the pains which before it suffered, were branded with the name of heretics :*

[ocr errors]

interjectum Chaos inhibet, quousque introeundi rursum in regnum coelorum tempus adveniat. Custodit ergo Dominus exitum, dum de corpore exeuntes secreti ab impiis interjecto Chao quiescunt. Custodit et introitum, dum nos in æternum illud et beatum regnum introducit.' Tract. in Psal. cxx. §. 16. And at the end of the second Psalm; Judicii enim dies vel beatitudinis retributio est æterna, vel poenæ : tempus vero mortis habet unumquemque suis legibus, dum ad judicium unumquemque aut Abraham reservat aut poena. §. 48. Thus Gregory Nyssen still leaves the patriarchs in Abraham's bosom, in expectation of admittance into heaven: Καὶ γὰρ οἱ περὶ τὸν ̓Αβραὰμ πατριάρχαι τοῦ μὲν ἰδεῖν τὰ ἀγαθὰ τὴν ἐπιθυμίαν ἔσχον, καὶ οὐκ ἀνῆκαν ἐπιζητοῦντες τὴν ἐπουράνιον πατρίδα καθώς φησιν ὁ ̓Απόστολος· ἀλλὰ ὁμῶς ἐν τῷ ἐλπίζειν ἔτι τὴν χάριν εἰσὶ, τοῦ Θεοῦ κρεῖττόν τι περὶ ἡμῶν προβλεψαμένου, κατὰ τὴν τοῦ Παύλου φωνὴν, ἵνα μὴ, φησὶ, χωρὶς Hμv TελεLowσi, De Hominis Opificio, c. 22. These therefore which conceived that the souls of the godly now after Christ's ascension do go unto the bosom of Abraham, where the patriarchs and prophets were and are, and that both remain together till the general resurrection, did not believe that Christ did therefore descend into hell, that he might, translate the patriarchs from thence into heaven.

And though he gives the heresy without a name, as he found it in Philastrius, yet we find the opinion was not very singular. For Euodius propounded it to St. Augustin as a question in which he desired satisfaction: 'An descendens Christus omnibus evangelizavit, omnesque a tenebris et pœnis per gratiam liberavit, ut a tempore resurrectionis Domini judicium exspectetur exinanitis inferis? Ep. 98. al. 163. ad S. August. And in his answer to that question, he looks not upon the affirmative part as a heresy, but as a doubtful proposition. His resolution, first, is, that it did not concern the prophets and the patriarchs, because he could not see how they should be thought to be in hell, and so capable of a deliverance from thence: ‘Addunt quidam hoc benefcium antiquis etiam Sanctis fuisse concessum, Abel, Seth, Noe, et domui ejus, Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob, aliisque patriarchis et prophetis, ut cum Dominus in infernum venisset, illis doloribus solverentur. Sed quonam modo intelligatur Abraham, in cujus sinum pius etiam pauper ille susceptus est, in illis fuisse doloribus, ego quidem non video: explicant fortasse qui possunt.' Epist. 99. al. 164. ad Euodium, §. 6, 7. Et paulo post: Unde illis justis, qui in sinu Abrahæ erant cum ille in inferna descenderet, nondum quid contulisset inveni, a quibus eum secundum beatificam præsenti* St. Augustin in his book De Hæ- am suæ Divinitatis nunquam video resibus reckons this as the seventy- recessisse.' §. 8. And yet in another ninth heresy: ́Alia, descendente ad he will not blame them that believed infernos Christo credidisse incredulos, the contrary, nor did he think their et omnes inde existimat liberatos.' opinion absurd: Si enim non ab

[ocr errors]

but to believe that many were delivered, was both by them and many others counted orthodox.

The means by which they did conceive that Christ did free the souls of men from hell, was the application of his death unto them, which was propounded unto those souls by preaching of the Gospel there:* that as he revealed here on earth the

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

surde credi videtur, antiquos etiam hoc possimus ostendere? Ibid. §. 3,4. Sanctos, qui venturi Christi tenuerunt Thus the opinion of St. Augustin is fidem, locis quidem a tormentis im- clear, that those which departed in the piorum remotissimis, sed apud infe- faith of Christ were before in happiros, fuisse, donec eos inde sanguis ness and the beatifical presence of Christi ad ea loca descensus erueret, God, and so needed no translation by &c.' De Civitate Dei, l. xx. c. 15. His the death of Christ; and of those second resolution was, that Christ did which were kept in the pains of hell, by his descent relieve some out of the some were loosed and delivered from pains of hell, taking hell in the worst them, some were not; and this was sense: Quia evidentia testimonia et the proper end or effect of Christ's deinfernum commemorant et dolores, scent into hell. Thus Capreolus: nulla causa occurrit, cur illo credatur Ipse in homine est visitare inferorum venisse Salvator, nisi ut ab ejus dolo- dignatus abstrusa, et præpositos morribus salvos faceret.' Epist. 99. al. 164. tis præsentia invictæ majestatis exter§. 8. Quamobrem teneamus firmis- ruit, et propter liberandos quos voluit, sime quod fides habet fundatissima inferorum portas reserari præcepit.' auctoritate firmata, quia Christus Epist. ad Hispanos, p. 49. St. Ammortuus est secundum Scripturas, et brose: Ipse autem inter mortuos quia sepultus est, et quia resurrexit liber remissionem in inferno positis, tertia die secundum Scripturas; et soluta mortis lege, donabat.' De In- caetera quæ de illo testatissima veri-carn. c. 5. Ὅλον γὰρ εὐθὺς σκυλεύσας tate conscripta sunt. In quibus etiam hoc est, quod apud inferos fuit, solutis eorum doloribus, quibus eum erat impossible teneri; a quibus etiam recte intelligitur solvisse et liberasse quos voluit.' Ibid. §. 14. His third resolution was, that how many these were which were delivered out of hell was uncertain, and therefore temerarious to define: 'Sed utrum omnes quos in eis invenit, an quosdam quos illo beneficio dignos judicavit, adhuc requiro.' Ibid. §. 8. Hoc scilicet quod scriptum est, Solutis doloribus inferni, non in omnibus, sed in quibusdam accipi potest, quos ille dignos ista liberatione judicabàt: ut neque frustra illic descendisse existimetur, nulli eorum profuturus qui ibi tenebantur inclusi; nec tamen sit consequens, ut quod Divina quibusdam misericordia justitiaque concessit, omnibus concessum esse putandum sit.' Ibid. §. 5, 'Potest et sic, ut eos dolores eum solvisse credamus quibus teneri ipse non poterat, sed quibus alii tenebantur quos ille noverat liberandos. Verum quinam isti sunt temerarium est definire. Si euim omnes omnino dixerimus tunc esse liberatos qui illuc inventi sunt, quis non gratuletur, si

τὸν ᾅδην, καὶ τὰς ἀφύκτους τοῖς τῶν κεκοιμημένων πνεύμασιν ἀναπετάσας πύλας, ἔρημόν τε καὶ μόνον ἀφεὶς ἐκεῖσε τὸν diáßolov åvεorn. S. Cyril. Homil. Pasch. 7. t. v. par. 2. p. 91. Who speaks full as high as those words of Euodius, or that heretic, whosoever it was, which is mentioned, though not named, by Philastrius, lib. de Hares. 74. For pnμos kai póvos diáßoλoc, is as much as, inferi exinaniti; and kɛvwoas roỡ Javátov μvxòv (which he useth in another homily) is the same.

;

• This preaching of the Gospel to the dead, was the general opinion of the fathers, as the end of his descent, or means, by which that good was wrought for the souls below, which was effected by his death. Eapro-.. pter Dominum in ea quæ sub terra descendisse, evangelizantem et illis adventum suum, remissam peccatorum exsistentem his qui credunt in eum. Crediderunt autem in eum omnes qui sperabant in eum, id est, qui adventum ejus prænunciaverunt, et dispo sitionibus ejus servierunt, Justi, et Prophetæ, et Patriarchæ, quibus similiter ut nobis remisit peccata.' Irenæus, adv. Hær. 1. iv. c. 45. 'Evepyel γὰρ, οἶμαι, καὶ ὁ Σωτὴρ, ἐπὶ τὸ σώζειν

will of God unto the sons of men, and propounded himself as the object of their faith, to the end that whosoever believed in him should never die; so after his death he shewed himself unto the souls departed, that whosoever of them would yet accept of and acknowledge him should pass from death to life. Thus did they think the soul of Christ descended into hell to preach the Gospel to the spirits there, that they might receive him who before believed in him, or that they might believe in him who before rejected him. But this cannot be received as the end, or way to effect the end, of Christ's descent: nor can I look upon it as an illustration of this Article, for many reasons. For, first, I have already shewn that the place of St. Peter, so often mentioned for it, is not capable of that sense, nor hath it any relation to our Saviour after death ; secondly, The ancients seem upon no other reason to have interpreted this place of St. Peter in that manner, but because other Apocryphal Writings led them to that interpretation, upon the authority whereof this opinion only can rely. A place of the prophet Jeremy was first produced,* that The

ἔργον αὑτοῦ· ὅπερ οὖν καὶ πεποίηκεν, τοὺς εἰς αὐτὸν πιστεῦσαι βεβουλημένους διὰ τοῦ κηρύγματος, ὅποι ποτ ̓ ἔτυχον γεγονότες, ἑλκύσας εἰς σωτηρίαν. Εἰ μὲν οὖν ὁ Κύριος δι ̓ οὐδὲν ἕτερον εἰς ᾅδου κατω ῆλθεν, ἢ διὰ τὸ εὐαγγελίσασθαι, ὥσπερ κατῆλθεν,ἤτοι πάντας εὐαγγελίσασθαι, ἢ μόνους Εβραίους. Εἰ μὲν οὖν πάντας, σωθήσονται πάντες οἱ πιστεύσαντες, καν ἐξ ἐθνῶν ὄντες τύχωσιν, ἐξομολογησάμενοι ἤδη ἐκεῖ. Clem. Αlex. Strom. l. vi. c. 6. Τριήμερος γὰρ ἀνεβίω κηρύξας καὶ τοῖς ἐν φυλακῇ πνεύμασι. Πληρεστάτη γὰρ οὕτως ἡ τῆς φιλανθρωπίας ἐπίδειξις ἦν, τῷ μὴ μόνον ἀνασῶσαι φημὶ, τοὺς ἔτι ζῶντας ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, ἀλλὰ καὶ τοῖς ἤδη κατοιχομένοις, καὶ ἐν τοῖς τῆς ἀβύσσου μυχοῖς καθημένοις ἐν σκότῳ, κατὰ τὸ γεγραμμένον, διακηρύξαι τὴν ἄφεσιν. S. Cyril. Alex. in Ioan. l. xi. c. 2. p. 933. Πολλαχοῦ διαμαρτύρεται ἡ γραφὴ, ὃν τρόπον τοῖς τηνικάδε ζῶσι, τὸν αὐτὸν καὶ τοῖς ἐν ᾅδου διὰ Χριστοῦ τὴν ἀπολύτρωσιν παραγενέσθαι. Λέγει γὰρ ὁ τῶν μαθητῶν κορυφαῖος, Εἰς τοῦτο γὰρ ἀπέθανε καὶ ἀνέστη, ἵνα καὶ νεκρῶν καὶ ζώντων κυριεύση καὶ πάλιν, Τοῖς ἐν φυλακῇ πορευθεὶς ἐκήρυξε πνεύμασιν, ἵνα κριθῶσι μὲν σαρκί, ζῶσι δὲ πνεύματι· τουτέστιν, ὅπως οἱ μὲν ἄπιστοι, καὶ διὰ τοῦτο ἁμαρτωλοὶ, μεμενηκότες κατακριθῶσιν, ἅτε δὴ ὁλοκλήρως σὰρξ γεγονότες, καὶ διχοτομηθέντες τοῦ πνεύματος· ὅσοι δὲ καν ἐν ᾅδου Χριστῷ τῇ δικαιοσύνῃ πεπιστεύκασι, τῆς πνευματικῆς εὐφροσύνης ἀπολαύωσι. Jobius apnd Photium, l. ix. cap. 38.

* Justin Martyr in his Dialogue

with Trypho the Jew: Καὶ ἀπὸ τῶν λόγων τοῦ αὐτοῦ Ἰερεμίου ὁμοίως ταῦτα περιέκοψαν, Εμνήσθη δὲ Κύριος ὁ Θεὸς ἀπὸ Ἰσραὴλ τῶν νεκρῶν αὐτοῦ τῶν κεκοιμημένων εἰς γῆν χώματος, καὶ κατέβη πρὸς αὐτοὺς εὐαγγελίσασθαι αὐτοῖς τὸ σωτήριον αὐτοῦ. p. 298. This place is first brought by Irenaeus, to prove that he which died for us was not only man but God: ' Et quoniam non so lum homo erat qui moriebatur pro nobis, ait Esaias, Et commemoratus est Dominus Sanctus Israel mortuorum suorum, quia (leg. qui) dormierant in terra sepultionis, et descendit ad eos, evangelizare salutem quæ est ab eo, ut salvaret eos. Adv. Hares. 1. iii. c. 23.

Only he names Isaiah instead of Jeremiah, whom he rightly names again: Sicut Hieremias ait, Recommemoratus est Dominus Sanctus Israel mortuorum, &c. l. iv. c. 39. And as there, so more plainly, l. v. c. 26. applies it to the soul of Christ while it was absent from his body: Nunc autem tribus diebus conversatus est ubi erant mortui, quemadmodum prophetia ait de eo, Commemoratus est Dominus Sanctorum (lege, Sanctus Israel) mortuorum suorum, eorum qui ante dormierunt in terra stipulationis (lege, sepultionis), et descendit ad eos, extrahere eos, et salvare eos. Thus, did Irenaeus make use of this verse, to shew Christ preached unto the dead, rather than that of St. Peter ; and yet there is no authority in it.

[ocr errors]
« ZurückWeiter »