Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

nature, degree, and extent of that inspiration, are questions undoubtedly of serious discussion; but they are questions amongst Christians themselves, and not between them and others. The doctrine itself is by no means necessary to the belief of Christianity, which must, in the first instance at least, depend upon the ordinary maxims of historical credibility.

In viewing the detail of miracles recorded in these books, we find every supposition negatived, by which they can be resolved into fraud or delusion. They were not secret, not momentary, not tentative, nor ambiguous; nor performed under the sanction of authority, with the spectators on their side, or in affirmance of tenets and practices already established. We find also the evidence alleged for them, and which evidence was by great numbers received, different from that upon which other miraculous accounts rest. It was contemporary, it was published upon the spot, it continued; it involved interests and questions of the greatest magnitude; it contradicted the most fixed persuasions and prejudices of the persons to whom it was addressed; it required from those who accepted it, not a simple, indolent assent, but a change from thenceforward of principles and conduct, a submission to consequences the most serious and the most deterring, to loss and danger, to insult, outrage, and persecution. How such a story should be false, or, if false, how under such circumstances, it should make its way, I think impossible to be explained; yet such the Christian story was, such were the circumstances under which it came forth, and in opposition to such difficulties did it prevail.

An event so connected with the religion, and with the fortunes of the Jewish people, as one of their race, one born amongst them, establishing his authority and his law throughout a great portion of the civilized world, it was perhaps to be expected should be noticed in the prophetic writings of that nation; especially when this person, together with * See Powell's Discourses, disc. xv. p. 245.

grea

[ocr errors]

e

a

t

C

his own mission, caused also to be acknowledge the divine original of their institution, and by thos who before had altogether rejected it. Accord ingly, we perceive in these writings various intima tions concurring in the person and history of Jesus, in a manner, and in a degree, in which passage taken from these books could not be made to con cur in any person arbitrarily assumed, or in an person except him who has been the author of changes in the affairs and opinions of mankind. some of these predictions the weight depends good deal upon the concurrence. Others posses great separate strength: one in particular does this in an eminent degree. It is an entire description, manifestly directed to one character and to one scene of things; it is extant in a writing or col lection of writings, declaredly prophetic; and it applies to Christ's character, and to the circumstances of his life and death, with considerable pref cision, and in a way which no diversity of interpre tation hath, in my opinion, been able to confound. That the advent of Christ, and the consequences of it, should not have been more distinctly revealed in the Jewish sacred books, is, I think, in som measure accounted for by the consideration, th for the Jews to have foreseen the fall of their is stitution, and that it was to emerge at length into more perfect and comprehensive dispensation, woul have cooled too much, and relaxed their zeal f it, and their adherence to it, upon which zeal an adherence the preservation in the world of any r mains, for many ages of religious truth might ins great measure depend.

Of what a revelation discloses to mankind, or and only one, question can probably be asked, WA it of importance to markind to know, or to better assured of? In this question, when we tun our thoughts to the great Christian doctrine of the resurrection of the dead, and of a future judgmert no doubt can possibly be entertained. He who gives me riches or honours, does nothing; he w even gives me health, does little in comparis

t

S

S

C

la

with that which lays before me just grounds for expecting a restoration to life, and a day of account and retribution; which thing Christianity hath done for millions.

Other articles of the Christian faith, although of infinite importance when placed beside any other topic of human inquiry, are only the adjuncts and circumstances of this. They are, however, such as appear worthy of the original to which we ascribe them. The morality of the religion, whether taken from the precepts or the example of its Founder, or from the lessons of its primitive teachers, derived, as it should seam, from what had been inculcated by their master, is in all its parts, wise and pure; neither adapted to vulgar prejudices, nor flattering popular notions, nor excusing established practices, but calculated, in the matter of its instruction, truly to promote human happiness, and in the from in which it was conveyed, to produce impression and effect; a morality, which, let it have proceeded from any person whatever, would have been satisfactory evidence of his good sense and integrity, of the soundness of his understanding and the probity of his designs; a morality, in every view of it, much more perfect than could have been expected from the natural circumstances and character of the person who delivered it; a morality, in a word, which is, and hath been most benefical to mankind.

Upon the greatest, therefore, of all possible occasions, and for a purpose of inestimable value, it pleased the Deity to vouchsafe a miraculous attestation. Having done this for the institution, when this alone could fix its authority, or give to it a beginning, he committed its future progress to the natural means of human communication, and to the influence of those causes by which human conduct and Juman affairs are governed. The seed, being sown, was left to vegetate; the leaven, being inserted, was left to ferment; and both according to the laws of nature: laws, nevertheless, disposed and controlled by that Providence which conducts the affairs of the universe, though by an influence

inscrutable, and generally undistinguishable by . And in this Christianity is analogous to most oth provisions for happiness. The provision is made; and being made, is left to act according to laws, which, a forming a part of a more general system, regulat this particular subject, in common with many other

Let the constant recurrence to our observation f contrivance, design, and wisdom, in the worksh nature, once fix upon our minds the belief of a Go h and after that all is easy. In the counsels off r being possessed of the power and disposition whid C the Creator of the universe must possess, it is n improbable that there should be a future state; it not improbable that we should be acquainted with it. A future state rectifies every thing; because, if moral agents be made, in the last event, happy or miserable, according to their conduct in the stations and under the circumstances in which they are placed, it seems not very material by the operation of what causes, according to what rules, or even, f you please to call it so, by what chance or caprice, these stations are assigned, or these circumstances determined. This hypothesis, therefore, solves s that objection to the divine care and goodness, whid the promiscuous distribution of good and evil (f not mean in the doubtful advantages of riches and grandeur, but in the unquestionably important d tinctions of health and sickness, strength and infirm ty, bodily ease and pain, mental alacrity and depred sion) is apt on so many occasions to create. Th one truth changes the nature of things; gives order to confusion; makes the moral world of a piece with the natural.

Nevertheless, a higher degree of assurance the that to which it is possible to advance this, or any argument drawn from the light of nature, was e cessary, especially to overcome the shock which the imagination and the senses receive from the effects and the appearances of death, and the obstruction which thence arises to the expectation of either & continued or a future existence. This difficulty although of a nature, no doubt, to act very forcibly,

[ocr errors]

will be found, I think, upon reflection, to reside more in our habits of apprehension, than in the subject; and that the giving way to it, when we have any reasonable grounds for the contrary, is rather an indulging of the imagination, than any thing else. Abstractedly considered, that is, considered without relation to the difference which habit, and merely habit, produces in our faculties and modes of apprehension, I do not see any thing more in the resurrection of a dead man, than in the conception of a child; except it be this, that the one comes into his world with a system of prior consciousness about him, which the other does not: and no person will say, that be knows enough of either subject to perceive, that this circumstance makes such a difference in the two cases, that the one should be easy, and the other impossible; the one natural, the other not

So.

To the first man, the succession of the species would be as incomprehensible, as the resurrection of the dead is to us.

Thought is different from motion, perception from impact: the individuality of a mind is hardly consistent with the divisiblity of an extended substance; or its volition, that is, its power of originating motion, with the inertness which cleaves to every portion of matter which our observation or our experiments can reach. These distinctions lead us to an immaterial principle: at least, they do this; they so negative the mechanical properties of matter, in the constitution of a sentient, still more of a rational being, that no argument drawn from these properties, can be of any great weight in opposition to other reasons, when the question respects the changes of which such a nature is capable, or the manner in which these changes are effected. Whatever thought be, or whatever it depend upon, the regular experience of sleep makes one thing conerning it certain, that it can be completely sus ended, and completely restored.

If any one find it too great a strain upon his houghts, to admit the notion of a substance strictly mmaterial, that is, from which extension and solidity

« ZurückWeiter »