Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1960 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 86
Seite 194
... testified that he watched the defendant leave and return in the cab and again heard a conversation over the receiving portion of the Schmidt device . He testified he heard the defendant say : " I promised you I would have spoons but I ...
... testified that he watched the defendant leave and return in the cab and again heard a conversation over the receiving portion of the Schmidt device . He testified he heard the defendant say : " I promised you I would have spoons but I ...
Seite 208
... testified that at that point in the conversation , Mr. Poore stated that the matter would be entirely between the bank and the respondent and the appellant and " that he had concluded in behalf of New Amsterdam to throw in the $ 20,000 ...
... testified that at that point in the conversation , Mr. Poore stated that the matter would be entirely between the bank and the respondent and the appellant and " that he had concluded in behalf of New Amsterdam to throw in the $ 20,000 ...
Seite 219
... testified he did not shoot at Pieschke or Becker . [ 4 ] As a witness for defendant , a Mr. Walvoord testified he was in the area when the shooting occurred about 9:30 p . m . on October 30 , 1958 ; he walked to the police car and ...
... testified he did not shoot at Pieschke or Becker . [ 4 ] As a witness for defendant , a Mr. Walvoord testified he was in the area when the shooting occurred about 9:30 p . m . on October 30 , 1958 ; he walked to the police car and ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
accident affirmed agreement alleged Allied Stores Am.Jur amended appellant appellant's arrest attorney automobile award burglary Cal.App Cal.Rptr California cause of action charged City claim Code Civ Code of Civil collision complaint concurred contention contract conviction corporation counsel Criminal Law damages defendant defendant's denied determination entitled error error coram nobis evidence fact fendant filed finding guilty inference instruction issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury lease liability Los Angeles County matter ment motion narcotics negligence October 22 officer operation ordinance parties Penal Code personal injuries petition petitioner plaintiff pleaded police premises prior proceedings prosecution protests provides question reasonable record References refused res ipsa loquitur respondent respondent's rule Second Dist Stanley Mosk statement statute sufficient Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court unlawful detainer vehicle verdict violation witness writ