have appeared not so much the minister as the colleague of his sovereign.* Valerian justly dreaded an elevation so full of envy and suspicion. He modestly urged the alarming greatness of the trust, his own insufficiency, and the incu rable corruption of the times. He artfully insinuated that the office of censor was inseparable from the imperial dignity, and that the feeble hands of a subject were unequal to the support of such an immense weight of cares and of power.† The approaching event of war soon put an end to the prosecution of a project so specious but so impracticable; and whilst it preserved Valerian from the danger, saved the emperor Decius from the disappointment which would most probably have attended it. A censor may maintain, he can never restore, the morals of a state. It is impossible for such a magistrate to exert his authority with benefit, or even with effect, unless he is supported with a quick sense of honour and virtue in the minds of the people; by a decent reverence for the public opinion, and by a train of useful prejudices combating on the side of national manners. a period when these principles are annihilated, the censorial jurisdiction must either sink into empty pageantry, or be converted into a partial instrument of vexatious oppression.‡ It was easier to vanquish the Goths, than to eradicate the public vices, yet, even in the first of these enterprises, Decius lost his army and his life.

In

The Goths were now on every side surrounded and pursued by the Roman arms. The flower of their troops had perished in the long siege of Philippopolis, and the exhausted country could no longer afford subsistence for the remaining multitude of licentious barbarians. Reduced to this extremity, the Goths would gladly have purchased, by the surrender of all their booty and prisoners, the permission of an undisturbed retreat. But the emperor, confident of victory, and resolving, by the chastisement of these invaders, to strike a salutary terror into the nations of the north, refused to listen to any terms of accommodation. The highspirited barbarians preferred death to slavery. An obscure

* This transaction might deceive Zonaras, who supposes that Valerian was actually declared the colleague of Decius, 1. 12, p. 625.

Hist. August. p. 174. The emperor's reply is omitted.

Such as the attempts of Augustus towards a reformation of manners. Tacit. Annal. 3, 24.

town of Moesia, called Forum Terebonii,* was the scene of the battle. The Gothic army was drawn up in three lines, and, either from choice or accident, the front of the third line was covered by a morass. In the beginning of the action, the son of Decius, a youth of the fairest hopes, and already associated to the honours of the purple, was slain by an arrow, in the sight of his afflicted father; who, summoning all his fortitude, admonished the dismayed troops, that the loss of a single soldier was of little importance to the republic. The conflict was terrible; it was the combat of despair against grief and rage. The first line of the Goths at length gave way in disorder; the second, advancing to sustain it, shared its fate; and the third only remained entire, prepared to dispute the passage of the morass, which was imprudently attempted by the presumption of the enemy. "Here the fortune of the day turned, and all things became adverse to the Romans; the place deep with ooze, sinking under those who stood, slippery to such as advanced; their armour heavy, the waters deep; nor could they wield, in that uneasy situation, their weighty javelins. The barba rians, on the contrary, were inured to encounters in the bogs, their persons tall, their spears long, such as could wound at a distance." In this morass the Roman army, after an ineffectual struggle, was irrecoverably lost; nor could the body of the emperor ever be found.§. Such was the fate of Decius, in the fiftieth year of his age; an accomplished prince, active in war, and affable in peace; who, together with his son, has deserved to be compared, both in life and death, with the brightest examples of ancient virtue.** This fatal blow humbled, for a very little time, the insolence of the legions. They appear to have patiently expected, and submissively obeyed, the decree of the senate

*Tillemont, Histoire des Empereurs, tom. iii, p. 598. As Zosimus and some of his followers mistake the Danube for the Tanais, they place the field of battle in the plains of Scythia. + Aurelius Victor allows two distinct actions for the deaths of the two Decii, but I have preferred the account of Jornandes. I have ventured to copy from Tacitus (Annal. 1, 64) the picture of a similar engagement between a Roman army and a German tribe.

§ Jornandes, c. 18. Zosimus, 1. 1, p. 22 (c. 23.) Zonaras, 1. 12, p. 627. Aurelius Victor. The Decii were killed before the end of the year 251, since the new princes took possession of the consulship on the ensuing calends of January. ** Hist. August. p. 223, gives them

which regulated the succession to the throne. From a just regard for the memory of Decius, the imperial title was conferred on Hostilianus, his only surviving son; but an equal rank, with more effectual power, was granted to Gallus, whose experience and ability seemed equal to the great trust. of guardian to the young prince and the distressed empire.* The first care of the new emperor was to deliver the Illyrian provinces from the intolerable weight of the victorious Goths. He consented to leave in their hands the rich fruits of their invasion, an immense booty, and what was still more disgraceful, a great number of prisoners of the highest merit and quality. He plentifully supplied their camp with every conveniency that could assuage their angry spirits, or facilitate their so much wished-for departure; and he even promised to pay them annually a large sum of gold, on condition they should never afterwards infest the Roman territories by their incursions.†

In the age of the Scipios, the most opulent kings of the earth, who courted the protection of the victorious commonwealth, were gratified with such trifling presents as could only derive a value from the hand that bestowed them; an ivory chair, a coarse garment of purple, an inconsiderable piece of plate, or a quantity of copper coin. After the wealth of nations had centred in Rome, the emperors displayed their greatness, and even their policy, by the regular exercise of a steady and moderate liberality towards the allies of the state. They relieved the poverty of the barbarians, honoured their merit, and recompensed their fidelity. These voluntary marks of bounty were understood to flow, not from the fears, but merely from the generosity or the gratitude of the Romans; and whilst presents and subsidies were liberally distributed among friends and suppliants, they were sternly refused to such as claimed them as a debt. But this stipulation of an annual payment to a victorious enemy, appeared without disguise in the light of a very honourable place among the small number of good emperors who reigned between Augustus and Dioclesian. * Hæc ubi patres

comperere

decernunt. (Victor in Cæsaribus.) + Zonaras, 1. 12, p. 628. A sella, a toga, and a golden patera of five pounds weight were accepted with joy and gratitude by the wealthy king of Egypt (Livy, 27, 4). Quina millia æris, a weight of copper in value about 187. sterling, was the usual present made to foreign ambassadors (Liv. 31, 9). § See the firmness of a Roman general so late as the

an ignominious tribute: the minds of the Romans were not yet accustomed to accept such unequal laws from a tribe of barbarians; and the prince, who by a necessary concession had probably saved his country, became the object of the general contempt and aversion. The death of Hostilianus, though it happened in the midst of a raging pestilence, was interpreted as the personal crime of Gallus; and even the defeat of the late emperor was ascribed by the voice of suspicion to the perfidious counsels of his hated successor.† The tranquillity which the empire enjoyed during the first year of his administration, served rather to inflame than to appease the public discontent; and, as soon as the apprehensions of war were removed, the infamy of the was more deeply and more sensibly felt.

peace

But the Romans were irritated to a still higher degree, when they discovered that they had not even secured their repose, though at the expense of their honour. The dangerous secret of the wealth and weakness of the empire had been revealed to the world. New swarms of barbarians, encouraged by the success, and not conceiving themselves bound by the obligation of their brethren, spread devastation through the Illyrian provinces, and terror as far as the gates of Rome. The defence of the monarchy, which seemed abandoned by the pusillanimous emperor, was assumed by Emilianus, governor of Pannonia and Moesia; who rallied the scattered forces, and revived the fainting spirits of the troops. The barbarians were unexpectedly attacked, routed, chased, and pursued beyond the Danube. The victorious leader distributed as a donative the money collected for the tribute, and the acclamations of the soldiers proclaimed him emperor on the field of battle.§ Gallus, who, careless of the general welfare, indulged himself in the pleasures of Italy, was almost in the same instant informed of the success of the revolt, and of the rapid approach of his aspiring lieutenant. He advanced to meet him as far as the plains of Spoleto. When the

time of Alexander Severus, in the Excerpta Legationum, p. 25, edit. Louvre. *For the plague, see Jornandes, c. 19, and Victor in Cæsaribus. These improbable accusations are alleged by Zosimus, Jornandes, c. 19. The Gothic writer at least observed the peace which his victorious countrymen had sworn to Gallus. § Zosimus, 1. 1, p. 25, 26.

1. 1, p. 23, 24.

armies came in sight of each other, the soldiers of Gallus compared the ignominious conduct of their sovereign with the glory of his rival. They admired the valour of Emilianus, they were attracted by his liberality, for he offered a considerable increase of pay to all deserters.*

The murder of Gallus, and of his son Volusianus, put an end to the civil war; and the senate gave a legal sanction to the rights of conquest. The letters of Æmilianus to that assembly displayed a mixture of moderation and vanity. He assured them that he should resign to their wisdom the civil administration; and contenting himself with the quality of their general, would in a short time assert the glory of Rome, and deliver the empire from all the barbarians both of the north and of the east.† His pride was flattered by the applause of the senate; and medals are still extant, representing him with the name and attributes of Hercules the Victor, and of Mars the Avenger.‡

If the new monarch possessed the abilities, he wanted the time necessary to fulfil these splendid promises. Less than four months intervened between his victory and his fall.§ He had vanquished Gallus; he sunk under the weight of a competitor more formidable than Gallus. That unfortunate prince had sent Valerian, already distinguished by the honourable title of censor, to bring the legions of Gaul and Germany to his aid. Valerian executed the commission with zeal and fidelity; and as he arrived too late to save his sovereign, he resolved to avenge him. The troops of Æmilianus, who still lay encamped in the plains of Spoleto, were awed by the sanctity of his character, but much more by the superior strength of his army: and as they were now become as incapable of personal attachment as they had always been of constitutional principle. they readily imbrued their hands in the blood of a prince who so lately had been the object of their partial choice.** The guilt was theirs, but the advantage of it was Valerian's; who obtained possession of the throne by the means, indeed, of a civil war, but with a degree of innocence singular in that age of * Victor in Cæsaribus. Zonaras, 1. 12, p. 628. + Banduri, Numismata, p. 94. § Eutropius (1. 9, c. 6) says, tertio mense. Eusebius omits this emperor. Zosimus, 1. 1, p. 28. Eutropius and Victor station Valerian's army in Rhætia. According to Aurelius Victor, disease terminated the life of Æmilianus. Eutropius, speaking of this event, makes no mention of any assassination.—GUIZOT.]

**