...who import a new test into that laid down in Roth v. United States, 354 US 476 (1957), namely, that "[a] book cannot be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value." I agree with my Brother WHITE that such a condition rejects the basic holding of Roth and gives the...

...of three obscenity cases decided by the Supreme Court on the same day last year. Another was Mishkin v. New York (383 US 502) , and the third was Memoirs...value of the book can neither be weighed against nor canceled by its prurient appeal or patent offensiveness. Hence, even on the view of the court below...

...of three obscenity cases decided by the Supreme Court on the same day last year. Another was Mishkin v. New York (383 US 502), and the third was Memoirs...value of the book can neither be weighed against nor canceled by its prurient appeal or patent offensiveness. Hence, even on the view of the court below...

...of three obscenity cases decided by the Supreme Court on the same day last year. Another was Mishkin v. New York, 383 US 502, and the third was Memoirs...to possess the requisite prurient appeal and to be patentlv offensive. Each of the three Federal constitutional criteria is applied independently; the...

...redeeming social value," emphasizing that the "three elements must coalesce," and that no such material can "be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value." Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 US 413, 418-419. Another Justice has not viewed the "social value" element...

...Court held that in this interpretation the Massachusetts court erred, that the correct test is that a book cannot be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value. "Each of the three federal constitutional criteria is to be applied independently ; the social value...

...are three justices who import a new test into that laid down in Roth [emphasis supplied], namely that 'a book cannot be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value.' / agree with my Brother White that such a condition rejects the basic holding of Roth and gives the...

...social value, its judgment must be reversed." Justice Clark's opinion appears at 16 L. Ed. 2d 18 : "'a book cannot be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value.' I agree with my Brother White that such a condition rejects the basic holding of Roth and gives the...

...are three justices who import a new test into that laid down in Roth [emphasis supplied], namely that 'a book cannot be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value.' / agree with my Brother White that such a condition reiects the basic holding of Roth and gives the...

...are three justices who import a new test into that laid down in Roth [emphasis supplied], namely that 'a book cannot be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value.' / agree with my Brother White that such a condition rejects the basic holding of Roth and gives the...