 | Samuel Comyn - 1807 - 646 Seiten
...had been miftaken in point of law ; for that whatever might be the contract between the vendor and vendee, the agreement for the carriage was between...the fame opinion, the rule was made abfolute without further argument. The laft reported cafe upon the queftion is Da-wet v. Peck, (f) •which was alfo... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1812 - 700 Seiten
...l.oldennot to be a variance, on the ground that whatever might be the contract, between the vendor anJ the vendee, the agreement for the carriage was between...the carrier and the vendor, the latter of whom was bylaw liable. V. Of the Declaration. FORMERLY the declaration in actions against common carriers stated... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1817 - 728 Seiten
...the hire was to be paid by the consignee was holden not to be a variance, on the ground that whatever might be the contract, between the vendor and the...the vendor, the latter of whom was by law liable. Where goods were delivered to a carrier at Exeter to convey to Falmouth, and there deliver them to... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1817 - 728 Seiten
...holden not to be a variance, on the ground that whatever might be the contract, between the vendor ar-d the vendee, the agreement for the carriage was between...the •vendor, the latter of whom was by law liable. Where goods were delivered to a carrier at Exeter to convey to Falmouth, and there deliver them to... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1817 - 870 Seiten
...that on considering the question he found he had been mistaken in point of law; for that, whatever might be the contract between the vendor and the vendee,...agreement for the carriage was between the carrier and the was 1787. vendor, the latter of whom was by hw liable. And the other ~ MoORl. two Judges being of the... | |
 | Francis Buller - 1817 - 684 Seiten
...question, he found he had been mistaken in a point of law. for that whatever might l>e the contr.ict between the vendor and the vendee, the agreement for the carriage was between the carrier and vendor, the latter of whom was by law liable. Moore v. Wilson, l TR 650. (b) So if a vendee order goods... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford - 1817 - 872 Seiten
...between the vendor and the vendee, the agreement for the carriage was between the carrier and the 1787. vendor, the latter of whom was by law liable. And the other :wo judges being of the same opinion, the rule was made absoMOORE and o°hen 'utc without farther argument.... | |
 | George Long - 1821 - 294 Seiten
...James, 5 Burr. (c) 1 TR 659. 2680. found he had been mistaken in point of law ; for that, wj1atever might be the contract between the vendor and the vendee,...carrier and the vendor, the latter of whom was by the law liable. The other Judges agreeing, the rule for setting aside the nonsuit was made absolute.... | |
 | Samuel Comyn - 1824 - 680 Seiten
...had been mistaken in point of law ; for that whatever might be the contract between the vendor and vendee, the agreement for the carriage was between...law liable." And the other two judges being of the same opinion, the rule was made absolute without further argument. But in the case of Dawes v. Peck,... | |
 | David James McCord, South Carolina. Constitutional Court of Appeals - 1826 - 670 Seiten
...on considering the question he found that he had been n,i taken in point of law; for that whatever might be the contract between the vendor and the vendee,...the latter of whom was by law liable;" and the other judges concurred. Now this case, so far from impugning the decision of 'his court, is directly in point... | |
| |
That on considering the question he found he had been mistaken in point of law ; for that whatever might be the contract between the vendor and vendee, the agreement for the carriage was between the carrier and the vendor, the latter of whom was by law... 
