 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 796 Seiten
...possessor thereof would be bound to do if in possession ;" also " that every receiver * * * may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver * * * Was appointed." It is not disputed... | |
 | 1888 - 564 Seiten
...owner would be bound to do if in possession. Section 3 allows suit to be brought against a receiver in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property in his charge, without the previous leave of the court which appointed him; such suit... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1887 - 460 Seiten
...owner would be bound to do if in possession. Section 3 allows suit to be brought against a receiver in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property in his charge without the previous leave of the court which appointed him ; such suit... | |
 | 1895 - 2084 Seiten
..."every receiver or manager of any property, appointed by any court of the United states, may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed ; but such... | |
 | 1888 - 1906 Seiten
...That every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the United States may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit... | |
 | 1894 - 2074 Seiten
...COURT. Supp. Rev. St. G14, which declares that any receivers appointed by federal courts "may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his In carrying on the business" without leave of court, does not authorize a suit by a stockholder of a corporation against its receiver... | |
 | 1905 - 1124 Seiten
...by the act of 1887-88, is untenable. His refusal to accede to the demands of appellant was not "an act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property in his custody," but was simply a refusal on his part to permit another to acquire title to a portion... | |
 | 1901 - 958 Seiten
...at b. 436, chap. 866), permitting receivers appointed by any court of the United States to be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected wit.h such property without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver is appointed, was it competent for said... | |
 | 1899 - 962 Seiten
..."every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the United States may be sued In respect of any act or transaction of his In carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 1066 Seiten
...8. 1887, 5 8, (24 St. 552, ) providing that every receiver appointed by a federal court may be sued "in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business" without leave of the court appointing tiirn, applies to such a receiver in respect of an act of his... | |
| |
States may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed... 
