Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 79
Seite 3
... Respondent . HERNDON , J. - Appellant Rufus Baker appeals from the judgment entered against him in an action in unlawful de- tainer . On August 21 , 1961 , plaintiff and respondent Martin T. Byrne filed his complaint in unlawful ...
... Respondent . HERNDON , J. - Appellant Rufus Baker appeals from the judgment entered against him in an action in unlawful de- tainer . On August 21 , 1961 , plaintiff and respondent Martin T. Byrne filed his complaint in unlawful ...
Seite 341
... respondent's admission procedure is a selective one and that limited financial aid only is extended to some students . Appellant reasons that since respondent's students come largely from families that can pay its tuition charges there ...
... respondent's admission procedure is a selective one and that limited financial aid only is extended to some students . Appellant reasons that since respondent's students come largely from families that can pay its tuition charges there ...
Seite 532
... respondent's pension application and concluded : that respondent's pension rights were barred by the statute of limitations ; that respondent's dismissal for insubordination had been upheld by the civil service board and that said ...
... respondent's pension application and concluded : that respondent's pension rights were barred by the statute of limitations ; that respondent's dismissal for insubordination had been upheld by the civil service board and that said ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
34 Cal.Rptr accident affidavit alleged Am.Jur amended Angeles County appellant's applied arbitration arrest Attorney automobile Cal.App California cause of action Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitute contends contract contributory negligence conviction corporation counsel Criminal Law damages Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's denied determine easement employee error evidence fact filed findings granted indemnity agreement injury instructions intent issue jurisdiction jurors jury lien Los Angeles County ment motion narcotics negligence nunc pro tunc offense officer parties Penal Code person petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent pleadings prior probation proceeding prosecution purpose question quiet title reason record References requested rule Second Dist Shaver Lake Sigal Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge Vehicle Code verdict voir dire witness writ