Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 81
Seite 640
... authority " has designated " a single intersection by the installation and operation of traffic signals which may be supplemented by signs or markings .. " In the instant case there was no evidence that the " outermost boundaries " of ...
... authority " has designated " a single intersection by the installation and operation of traffic signals which may be supplemented by signs or markings .. " In the instant case there was no evidence that the " outermost boundaries " of ...
Seite 753
... Authority and a refusal by the court to recognize the provisions of sections 1700 and 1731.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code . * At the time of these remarks there was no request before the court for reference to the Youth Authority ...
... Authority and a refusal by the court to recognize the provisions of sections 1700 and 1731.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code . * At the time of these remarks there was no request before the court for reference to the Youth Authority ...
Seite 754
... Authority , but then had received a later report ( apparently with the Youth Authority recommendation de- leted ) . He stated his belief that there was legal cause why judgment of imprisonment should not be pronounced , that in view of ...
... Authority , but then had received a later report ( apparently with the Youth Authority recommendation de- leted ) . He stated his belief that there was legal cause why judgment of imprisonment should not be pronounced , that in view of ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
34 Cal.Rptr accident affidavit alleged Am.Jur amended Angeles County appellant's applied arbitration arrest Attorney automobile Cal.App California cause of action Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitute contends contract contributory negligence conviction corporation counsel Criminal Law damages Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's denied determine easement employee error evidence fact filed findings granted indemnity agreement injury instructions intent issue jurisdiction jurors jury lien Los Angeles County ment motion narcotics negligence nunc pro tunc offense officer parties Penal Code person petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent pleadings prior probation proceeding prosecution purpose question quiet title reason record References requested rule Second Dist Shaver Lake Sigal Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge Vehicle Code verdict voir dire witness writ