Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 84
Seite 114
... Claim . - Former Gov. Code , § 803 , requiring the filing of a claim with the employ- ing entity in actions respecting a public employee's negligence within the scope of his employment , was by its terms appli- cable to an action ...
... Claim . - Former Gov. Code , § 803 , requiring the filing of a claim with the employ- ing entity in actions respecting a public employee's negligence within the scope of his employment , was by its terms appli- cable to an action ...
Seite 116
... claim ends with demand upon the County of Mendocino in the sum of $ 75,000 . It was rejected by the county on the day after it was filed . Plaintiff had known that the surgeon was named Delafield , because he had visited her " every ...
... claim ends with demand upon the County of Mendocino in the sum of $ 75,000 . It was rejected by the county on the day after it was filed . Plaintiff had known that the surgeon was named Delafield , because he had visited her " every ...
Seite 118
... claim . It could have been argued that despite the fact that the claim does not refer to section 803 , but only to statutes having to do with claims against public entities , as distinguished from claims against public employees ; that ...
... claim . It could have been argued that despite the fact that the claim does not refer to section 803 , but only to statutes having to do with claims against public entities , as distinguished from claims against public employees ; that ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
34 Cal.Rptr accident affidavit alleged Am.Jur amended Angeles County appellant's applied arbitration arrest Attorney automobile Cal.App California cause of action Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitute contends contract contributory negligence conviction corporation counsel Criminal Law damages Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's denied determine easement employee error evidence fact filed findings granted indemnity agreement injury instructions intent issue jurisdiction jurors jury lien Los Angeles County ment motion narcotics negligence nunc pro tunc offense officer parties Penal Code person petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent pleadings prior probation proceeding prosecution purpose question quiet title reason record References requested rule Second Dist Shaver Lake Sigal Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge Vehicle Code verdict voir dire witness writ