Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 78
Seite 116
... filed . There is no mention in it of defendant's being an employee , and no mention of the county or its hospital . Nothing is said about filing of any claim . In the Government Code there were , at all times relevant , two statutes ...
... filed . There is no mention in it of defendant's being an employee , and no mention of the county or its hospital . Nothing is said about filing of any claim . In the Government Code there were , at all times relevant , two statutes ...
Seite 118
... filed a valid claim under section 803 , at least , if she had chosen to seek to make some amendments to the claim . It could have been argued that despite the fact that the claim does not refer to section 803 , but only to statutes ...
... filed a valid claim under section 803 , at least , if she had chosen to seek to make some amendments to the claim . It could have been argued that despite the fact that the claim does not refer to section 803 , but only to statutes ...
Seite 378
... filed on October 13 , 1961 , showing an appraisal of $ 556,436.97 . On June 25 , 1962 , the inheritance tax appraiser for Marin County filed a report indicating that the clear market value of the property in the decedent's estate was ...
... filed on October 13 , 1961 , showing an appraisal of $ 556,436.97 . On June 25 , 1962 , the inheritance tax appraiser for Marin County filed a report indicating that the clear market value of the property in the decedent's estate was ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
34 Cal.Rptr accident affidavit alleged Am.Jur amended Angeles County appellant's applied arbitration arrest Attorney automobile Cal.App California cause of action Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitute contends contract contributory negligence conviction corporation counsel Criminal Law damages Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's denied determine easement employee error evidence fact filed findings granted indemnity agreement injury instructions intent issue jurisdiction jurors jury lien Los Angeles County ment motion narcotics negligence nunc pro tunc offense officer parties Penal Code person petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent pleadings prior probation proceeding prosecution purpose question quiet title reason record References requested rule Second Dist Shaver Lake Sigal Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge Vehicle Code verdict voir dire witness writ