Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 72
Seite 10
... officer testified that he observed what he considered to be hypodermic marks on the appellant's left wrist caused by the illegal use of narcotics . There were additional marks on the appellant's forearm . The officer then shone a light ...
... officer testified that he observed what he considered to be hypodermic marks on the appellant's left wrist caused by the illegal use of narcotics . There were additional marks on the appellant's forearm . The officer then shone a light ...
Seite 24
... officer had not made a written memorandum of the serial number , but he remembered it . The particular bill was not retained as evi- dence against the defendant but was returned by the officer to the secret service fund . 2 At the trial ...
... officer had not made a written memorandum of the serial number , but he remembered it . The particular bill was not retained as evi- dence against the defendant but was returned by the officer to the secret service fund . 2 At the trial ...
Seite 682
... Officer Miranda saw a car enter the alley behind defendant's house . A man got out of the car and approached the back gate leading to the house . The officer recognized that he was Bill Heath , a known nar- cotic addict , and a man whom ...
... Officer Miranda saw a car enter the alley behind defendant's house . A man got out of the car and approached the back gate leading to the house . The officer recognized that he was Bill Heath , a known nar- cotic addict , and a man whom ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
34 Cal.Rptr accident affidavit alleged Am.Jur amended Angeles County appellant's applied arbitration arrest Attorney automobile Cal.App California cause of action Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitute contends contract contributory negligence conviction corporation counsel Criminal Law damages Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's denied determine easement employee error evidence fact filed findings granted indemnity agreement injury instructions intent issue jurisdiction jurors jury lien Los Angeles County ment motion narcotics negligence nunc pro tunc offense officer parties Penal Code person petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent pleadings prior probation proceeding prosecution purpose question quiet title reason record References requested rule Second Dist Shaver Lake Sigal Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge Vehicle Code verdict voir dire witness writ