Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney Company, 1963 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-3 von 82
Seite 77
... testimony from her was offered either by way of deposition or otherwise . [ 7 ] It long has been the rule in California that where the existence of a witness , and the materiality of his testimony , is known prior to a trial , a failure ...
... testimony from her was offered either by way of deposition or otherwise . [ 7 ] It long has been the rule in California that where the existence of a witness , and the materiality of his testimony , is known prior to a trial , a failure ...
Seite 296
... testimony is used against him . Courts should protect this right zealously . [ 7 ] Testimony given at a preliminary examination should not be used against him at the trial unless it satisfactorily appears that he has had an oppor ...
... testimony is used against him . Courts should protect this right zealously . [ 7 ] Testimony given at a preliminary examination should not be used against him at the trial unless it satisfactorily appears that he has had an oppor ...
Seite 297
... testimony . In People v . Carter , supra , the court said at page 749 : " The court also erred in excluding the testimony of defen- dant's minister . Defendant offered the testimony of Reverend Crouch that on October 4th defendant told ...
... testimony . In People v . Carter , supra , the court said at page 749 : " The court also erred in excluding the testimony of defen- dant's minister . Defendant offered the testimony of Reverend Crouch that on October 4th defendant told ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
34 Cal.Rptr accident affidavit alleged Am.Jur amended Angeles County appellant's applied arbitration arrest Attorney automobile Cal.App California cause of action Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil complaint concurred constitute contends contract contributory negligence conviction corporation counsel Criminal Law damages Defendant and Appellant Defendant and Respondent defendant's denied determine easement employee error evidence fact filed findings granted indemnity agreement injury instructions intent issue jurisdiction jurors jury lien Los Angeles County ment motion narcotics negligence nunc pro tunc offense officer parties Penal Code person petition petitioner Plaintiff and Appellant Plaintiff and Respondent pleadings prior probation proceeding prosecution purpose question quiet title reason record References requested rule Second Dist Shaver Lake Sigal Stanley Mosk statement statute Superior Court supra sustained testified testimony tion trial court trial judge Vehicle Code verdict voir dire witness writ