Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

imitation of the above. The best works on these coins are Simon's Essay on Irish Coins, with Mr. Snelling's Supplement, Dublin, 1810, and John Lindsay's View of the Coinage of Ireland, Cork, 1839, the latter far superior to the former.

B. W. ADAMS, D.D.

writer-being-engaged-at-the-moment is a fact," &c., here the first part of the sentence is nominative or subject of the verb "is," as it would be in Greek, τό τὸν κριτικὸν πραγματευέσθαι φανερόν ἐστι. "The writer's being engaged," &c., might be a more correct construction, but the other also, These Hiberno-Danish coins are neither uncomI think, is idiomatic. Indeed, MR. THOMPSON mon nor expensive, not being much prized by colhimself uses a sentence which, though quite lectors. Messrs. Lincoln & Son, Oxford Street, idiomatic, is not quite grammatically correct. London, or any coin dealer, most likely have them When he says, "The general's landing ten thou- for sale; the majority of them are only worth old sand men in one day awed the island," he makes silver, as their legends are so imperfect as to make the substantive "landing," corresponding to the it a matter of extreme difficulty to appropriate them. Old English verbal substantives in -ung (Morris, Besides the coins already mentioned there were Accidence, § 291), take after it "ten thousand in circulation Bracteate coins, very thin, and men "in the objective or accusative case, as though struck only on one side. These coins are supposed it were the pres. participle of " to land." Strictly to have been issued by Irish sovereigns previous he should have said "the landing of ten thousand to and along with the Hiberno-Danish series. men." In the Auth. Ver. we find both constructions. Compare, "Forget not the Lord thy God, in not keeping his commandments" (Deut. viii. 11), beside, "In keeping of them there is great reward" (Ps. xix. 11). See also the Collect for the Eleventh Sunday after Trinity. "The exercising these tendencies," &c. (Dean Alford, Sermons in Quebec Chapel, p. 185). The fact is the verbal substantive seems to retain sufficient of the transitive force of the verb to govern another substantive in the accusative. In Plautus tactio, a touching, frequently governs an accusative; e. g., "Quid tibi nos tactio est ?" (Aul., iii. 2, 1. 9), What business have you touching us? "Quid tibi hanc digito tactio est ?" (Poen., v. 5, 1. 29). And so in Vedic Sanskrit, as Mr. Ferrar notes, many nouns, following the analogy of the verb, are construed with the accusative (Comparative Grammar, vol. i. p. 198).

Lower Norwood, S. E.

A. SMYTHE PALMER.

[blocks in formation]

COLLECTIONS OF METAPHORS, &c. (5th S. vii. 289.)-Does R. P. know the following?" Flowers of Fancy, Exhibited in a Collection of Similes taken from Various Authors and Alphabetically Arranged by Henry Schultes. London, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green. 1829." It is an elegantly printed 8vo. volume, with an engraved title-page, having, besides the title and imprint, an allegorical vignette more appropriate than artistic. H. BUXTON FORMAN.

R. P.'s question is rather too large a one to be answered in "N. & Q." If, however, R. P. will send me his name and address I may perhaps be able to help him, as I have been for many years compiling such a book as he wants.

Chigwell.

JOHN CHURCHILL SIKES.

DICTIONARY OF ENGLISH MALE AND FEMALE CHRISTIAN NAMES (5th S. vii. 267.)-MR. WARREN will probably find what he requires in Miss Charlotte M. Yonge's History of Christian Names, 3 vols., 8vo. K. P. D. E.

See a very good list, with the etymologies, in Camden's Remains, edit. 1870, John Russell Smith, Soho Square, London. "Edward" and "Henry" are both in the list. The price of the book is, I think, 3s. 6d. FREDK. RULE.

Ashford.

Appended to Riddle's Eng.-Lat. Dictionary is a list of Christian names with their significations, from which the following is taken :- "Edward, Sax. (happy keeper). Henry, Germ. (rich lord)." H. STUBBS. Danby, Ballyshannon.

See Ainsworth's Latin Dictionary, edited by
Thomas Morell, D.D., 1796, vol. ii., towards the
end.
R. M. SPENCE, M.A.

Manse of Arbuthnott, N.B.

THE TOWN OR VILLAGE OVEN (5th S. vii. 268.) -Lords of manors in olden times not only held the town mill, but also, as your correspondent suggests, the town oven. Examples of the latter are not very rare. The following are from the records of the Manchester manor (vide Chetham Society, lviii. and lxiii.) :—a.d. 1473, "The wife

information required by MR. FOWLER. I shall be glad to let him have the others if he requires them :

Asiatic Researches.

Description de l'Egypte, Paris, 1818.

Sir Wm. Drummond, Edipus Judaicus, 1811 or 1866.
atlas of plates), Paris. 1835-6.
Dupuis, Origine de Tous les Cultes, &c. (10 vols. and

Kircher, Edipus Egyptiacus, &c., 1652-6.
W. H. RYLANDS.

Thelwall, Cheshire.

of Thurstan Chaloner holds a common oven (furnum) at the will of the Lord"; A.D. 1561, the jury of the court order "that John Chalner shall show at the next court day sufficient conveyance from the Lord la Warr for the common oven and the way leading to it, or it shall be law-323.)-The explication as to how the "secrets and ful for Lord la Warr to enter into the same as in his own right." The ancient custumal of Preston (thirteenth century) contains a clause to the effect that the free burgesses of that borough shall not be compelled to go to the oven, the kiln, or the mill of the lord of the manor.

H. FISHWICK, F.S.A.

There was an oven at the top of Cornhill during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, perhaps later, which appears to have been appropriated to common use, subject, I suppose, to control of the City authorities. I have seen some account of this oven in Stow or some other of the old City historians, but cannot put my hand upon it now. The pound and the stocks were originally under the control of the lord of the manor; why not the oven? Had the custom of "lopping and topping" of timber any connexion herewith?

CORNELIUS WALFORD.

Belsize Park Gardens, N.W.

THE CHINESE AND EGYPTIAN SIGNS OF THE ZODIAC (5th S. vii. 268.)-I refer MR. FOWLER to the following works. The names of the signs of the Chinese zodiac he will find in vol. iii. of the Encyclopædia Britannica, fifth edition, 1815, p. 10. For corrections as to the date of Chinese astronomy see the edition of the Encyclopædia now publishing. For the Egyptian zodiac, he will find it depicted on a plate in Landseer's Sabaran Researches, p. 243, published 1823. MR. FOWLER will find an interesting paper on the " Astronomy and Astrology of the Babylonians," by the Rev. A. H. Sayce. in the third vol. of the Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archæology, 1874, pp. 145339, in which the signs are discussed. Should MR. FOWLER wish to compare these with the Indian zodiac, he will find a plate of it in the Works of Sir William Jones, vol. i. p. 345, as also a plate of the Hindoo lunar mansions, p. 337, with full descriptions by the learned author.

EDWARD PARFITT.

Devon and Exeter Institution, Exeter.

I have a few notes of references to books on ancient and other zodiacs, from which I select the following. Perhaps some of them may supply the

FREEMASONS AND BEKTASHGEES (5th S. vii. symbolical proceedings" of Freemasons originated, given by H. C. C., is so very improbable that I should like to know what Professor Vambéry, who lived so long with Dervishes, has to tell us about the Bektashgees. In the mean time I will venture to make a few observations on what H. C. C. has written.

From the earliest ages to which history reaches

every form of religion, every form of government, every science, art, and trade, has had its secrets. Among the early Christians many things were kept secret from the great Roman people, and even now each oral confession is a secret. In both the Anglican and Roman Churches what passes at the examinations of candidates for the priesthood is not known by the public. To say, therefore, discover any traces of the secrets of Freemasonry in the rules of a guild, which were to be approved by the unreformed Catholic Church, "the importance of this silence is so great that it of itself decides the question," is to tax rather too severely the credulity of his readers. Moreover, the control of the Roman Catholic Church, in the Middle Ages, was not so complete over the consciences of men as H. C. C. assumes it to have been. This is proved by the frequent reforms which the Popes found it necessary to introduce into monasteries and convents, and the manner in which abbots and abbesses neglected or defied the orders of the bishops who visited them. As such was the case, how much slighter must have been the control of the Roman Church over the proceedings and secrets of a brotherhood of workmen! The nature of the great works on which the masons were then employed, and the fact that they passed from one part of a country-and of Europe-to another, render it very likely that, from a very early date, they made use of secret means of recognition among themselves, by which they might know one of their brotherhood, and distinguish him from the ordinary local labourers they must have employed.

as H. C. C. does, that because he has failed to

By pointing to the fate of the Templars as a proof of what he asserts, H. C. C. goes very wide from the mark. The Templars were not a brotherhood of workmen, for they took religious vows, which

the masons did not do generally, although some of them were monks. H. C. C. next tells us that the craft has always given admission to Jews, and is, therefore, non-Christian. Can he say, with any certainty, when the first Jew was made a Freemason?

H. C. C. has certainly failed to prove that the secrets and symbolical proceedings of Freemasonry were imported into this country in the seventeenth century. RALPH N. JAMES.

Ashford, Kent.

[Laconian] having plucked all the feathers off from a nightingale, and seeing what a little body it had; "Surely," quoth he, " thou art all voice and nothing else."-Plutarch's Morals, fol., 1603, p. 470.

"W. B. R." "Vox tu es, et nihil præterea," is the translation of Xylander, Plut., Opp. Mor., Par., 1624, p. 233a. ED. MARSHALL.

Miscellaneous.

NOTES ON BOOKS, &c.

Susser Archæological Collections, relating to the History
and Antiquities of the County. Published by the Sussex
Archæological Society. Vol. XXVII. (Lewes, G. P.
Bacon.)
THE volumes issued by the above society are always in-
teresting, and the one just issued is especially so. The
editor contributes the continuation of an excellent paper
on Findon; the Rev. C. J. Robinson another of great
local interest on Stopham. Mr. Henry Campkin fur-

THE REV. WILLIAM JAMES JAY, RECTOR OF ELVEDEN, SUFFOLK (5th S. vii. 308), was the second son of Samuel John Jay, of Cavendish (mentioned in "N. & Q.," 5th S. vi. 57). He married Harriet, daughter of Martin Rawling Osborne, of St. Ives, co. Hunts, and left by her two sons, Willie Parkinson and Arthur Osborne Montgomery, both, I think, now at St. Catharine'snishes two biographies of deceased Sussex celebritiesCollege, Cambridge.

Mr. Jay was born in 1819 and died in 1869. An obituary notice of him occurs in the Calcutta Christian Intelligencer for January, 1870, of which I subjoin a sentence or two :

"Brought up himself, in right of descent, among the nobles of the land, he evinced it by a self-possessed and unembarrassed bearing, dignity of address, and felicitous appropriateness of speech...... The Viceroy of India speaks of him thus, 'It is difficult to call up any individual acts or incidents in that most admirable man's, Jay's, life. But I know of no one whose memory is so fresh and fragrant, one so simple, yet so earnest."" The arms borne by Mr. Jay were those of Jay of Scotland, Az., three dolphins naiant or. He came of a most ancient and once wealthy family, but owing to his father's misfortunes he was himself entirely sans terre." S. DE H.

[ocr errors]

DE BURES (5th S. vii. 309.)—I also shall be glad to know who William de Bures was who is mentioned in the Testa de Nevile as holding a knight's fee in Norfolk under John Fitz Alan. Perhaps MR. CHARRINGTON can tell me so much. G. A. C.

AUTHORS OF BOOKS WANTED (5th S. vii. 350.)Canidia; or, the Witches, &c.-The copy of the titlepage, as printed at the above reference, transposes the author's initials. They are "R. D.," and not " D. R." I am the possessor of Dr. Farmer's copy, in which he has written: "In Mr. Hutton's Catal., p. 65, No. 1552, this strange composition is ascribed to one Dixon. There was a Robert Dixon, an author about the time and D.D. (Wood's Fasti, vol. ii. p. 103), but it surely must not be given to him Qy. This is the only copy I have seen, 1785." J. F. MARSH.

W. Durrant Cooper and M. A. Lower. There is also an
article, "Remarks on the probable Site of the British
City and Roman Station of Anderida," by Mr. T. Elliott.
than half-a-dozen places have claimed to be the site of
This newly vexes an already much vexed question. More
the old station. These have been so eliminated as to
leave only two candidates for the honour,-majestic
Pevensey, still rejoicing in walls and towers, and Newen-
den, on the Rother, whose intrenchments still give sign
of battle done there. Camden thought that the old Car-
melite friary near Newenden was the actual site of the
ancient fortress, British or Roman. A few years ago the
Rev. Mr. Hussey was looked upon as the successful.
demolisher of any such thought, and the as successful
champion of Pevensey. But now we have Mr. Elliott
backing Camden, and suppressing Mr. Hussey and his
maintained that it was Celtic in origin, composed of an,
reasonings. Then, as to the name "Anderida," Dr. Guest
a negative, and tred, a dwelling place, meaning in com-
bination an undwelt-in district. Mr. Baxter, with the
usual happy variety in such cases, insisted that "Ande-
rida" meant "the two passages," which passages, by the
way, Mr. Elliott discovers in the creek and river near
Newenden.

Mr. Hussey held that Anderida was the name of a Roman fortress. Mr. Elliott holds that Ande

rida was a large British settlement, quite distinct from the Roman station. The only unquestionable fact is that the Britons, who were as thick as bees, were stamped out of existence by Ella, whom Hengist invited for the purpose, and that archaeologists are at issue as to the scene of the atrocity. It is ill arguing, perhaps, from the marshes, woods, fields, &c., of the present time; these must have become what they are after great changes; and, with a prejudice in favour of Pevensey, which is in sight of the sea, as Gildas described it, whereas Newenden is not, the public verdict will hardly be in favour of Mr. Elliott. But he will have very general approval of the courtesy and earnestness with which he fights his battle.

MESSRS. LONGMANS have added another volume to the

AUTHORS OF QUOTATIONS WANTED (5th S. vii. series illustrating "Epochs of Modern History." The 330, 359.)

"Vox et præterea nihil." This was answered in 1 S. i. 421"This saying is to be found in Plutarch's Laconic Apophthegms (ATоplέyμата Aakóvika), Plutarchi, Opp. Moral., ed. Wyttenb., vol. i. p. 649. Philemon Holland has turned it into English thus:- Another

latest volume has for its subject The Normans in Europe. It is the well condensed work of the Rev. A. H. Johnson, Historical Lecturer in Oxford University.

MESSRS. JAMES PARKER & Co. have published, in a compressed form, that portion of The Annals of England (W. E. Freeman) which deals with the Stuarts, from 1603 to 1660-another aid to teaching and learning his

tory in periods. Prof. Stubbs has published favourable testimony to the value of the Annals, and he gave advice and "invaluable criticism" to Mr. Johnson when the latter gentleman was preparing his book on the Norman period.

LAMMAS RIGHTS AT FULHAM.I subjoin some euttings from a debate which took place at a vestry meeting of the parish of Fulham, on Tuesday, April 24 last. Irrespective of the great antiquity of this town, the subject is an interesting one to the observer of old historical customs. The following reference to Sir Henry Maine's Village Communities will strengthen, perhaps, its claim to a place here :

"Many have seen that the history of agriculture, of land-law, and of the relations of classes cannot thoroughly be constructed until the process has been thoroughly deciphered by which the common or waste land was brought under cultivation, either by the lord of the manor or by the lord of the manor in connexion with the commoners. The history of inclosures and of Inclosure Acts is now recognized as of great importance to our general history." -P. 85.

"The business was to take into consideration a recommendation from the Lammas Rights' Committee. Mr. Mugford moved: That the Lammas Rights' Committee be requested to hold a meeting and be empowered to call and receive evidence respecting existing Lammas Rights of this parish, in order, if necessary, to assert the rights of parishioners.' He considered that the proper time had arrived when the vestry should be in possession of a map setting forth the limits of Lammas Rights. He was very much astonished to find that they had not a single trace of any document showing the Lammas Rights. This would strengthen the hands of their legal advisers. If they found that the Lammas Rights were in the hands of other people, they could call upon them to prove their title. Mr. Lammin said there were eight or ten old inhabitants who were able to give evidence on this question. He had no doubt the copyholders existed over the parish, but fences had been allowed to grow up and the rights had apparently lapsed. At present they could only proceed with such parts as those near the river, and, perhaps, in the Fulham Fields. Mr. Schofield said there had been a road down to the river for centuries. There were cottages down there to which there was a right of way, and they were placed under sanitary regulations. The Lammas Rights, in respect to those cottages, had slipped away. It was high time they had a fresh 'school' to look after the rights of the parish. Mr. Rawkins seconded the motion. To talk of Lammas Rights near the Thames was nonsense. That part of their rights was hardly worth fighting for. The Fulham market gardens were laid out on Lammas lands. They belonged to Ful ham charities, and they had been allowed to lapse."West London Advertiser, April 28, 1877.

G. LAURENCE GOMME, F.R.H.S. "PINFOLD."-The following is from the Leeds Mercury of the 8th inst. :-"Impounded in the Pinfold, Edward Street, Leeds, a brown mare. If not claimed before Tuesday next, the 15th inst., will be sold in Smithfield Market, according to law.-H. Wright, Pinder, 1, Little Templar Street."

Notices to Correspondents.

ON all communications should be written the name and address of the sender, not necessarily for publication, but as a guarantee of good faith.

H. D. M.-Robert Fleming, jun., was a native of Scotland. He was minister of a Scotch church in Holland,

and subsequently of another in London. His work on The Rise and Fall of the Papacy (1701, repub. 1848) was a far-seeing work, in which events were referred to which, later, seemed to find a coincidence with matters connected with the French Revolution and difficulties and troubles of the Papacy. The doggerel lines you send were not Fleming's, but some prophet's (after the events therein named), who attributed them to poor Mother Shipton.

JUNIOR GARRICK.-On the 8th inst. a hundred years had elapsed since Sheridan's comedy, The School for Scandal, was first acted. It was brought out at Drury Lane. King and Mrs. Abington were the original Sir Peter and Lady Teazle. Sheridan's Rivals was produced two years earlier at Covent Garden. The original actors of Sir Anthony and Captain Absolute were Shuter and Woodward. For the other query, see any of the Era almanacks.

S. COL.-The burial register of St. Dunstan's-in-the West records, under date 1604, "Sir Arthur Atye, Knt., out of Shoe Lane, secretary to the great Earl of Leicester, attendant on the unfortunate Earl of Essex." Sir Arthur had a country house at Kilburn.

J. L. W.-The words belong to a song composed, in the Government interest, at the time of the Irish Rebellion. There was a song of the opposite faction, with the chorus, "We'll gloriously die, crying, Croppies, rise Croppies-crop-haired, a party sign.

up!

X. X.-Dr. John Armstrong (1709-1779), the author of the well-known poem, The Art of Preserving Health, was author also of another poem, The Economy of Love. For this poem he received 50l. from Miller, of Fleet Street, but he lost by it both reputation and practice. These were hardly regained by a later expurgated edition.

J. B. S. (Cornbrook, Manchester) writes:-"A Song of the Amperzand' (5th S. vii. 345). These verses are one, three, four, and five of a set of six verses contributed to Punch, vol. lvi. p. 153, April 17, 1869, by Scandula Exoluta,'' 'Hanwell.'"

[ocr errors]

T. C. asks for the name of the publisher of a small It was in the form of a letter work on Shall and Will. addressed to an Irish student at an English university, and the price was sixpence.

F. L. P.-For "a list of the persons upon whom, and when, such honours (Peerages, Baronetcies, and Knighthoods) were conferred" by James II. after his abdication, and by his son and grandson, see our 3rd S. ix. 71.

S. W. asks FRAXINUS to say how the books referred to ante, p. 357, can be obtained. We would forward a letter to S. W.

E. ELGARD. Write to the lady herself, to the care of Messrs. R. Bentley & Son, her publishers. HIC ET UBIQUE.-The phrase is first noticed ante, p. 138.

P. DICKSON.-Mapes's verses, beginning "Mihi est propositum in tabernâ mori," are in Camden's Remains. H. E. W.-Please forward a reply; if in time it shall appear next week.

DISCIPULUS ("Sir Isaac Newton.")-See ante, p. 207. R. S. B.-If possible, next week.

J. W. W. (City Churches.)-We have a letter for you. H. M. AUSTIN.-We will forward your communication.

NOTICE.

Editorial Communications should be addressed to "The Business Letters to "The Publisher"-at the Office, 20, Editor of Notes and Queries '"-Advertisements and Wellington Street, Strand, London, W.C.

We beg leave to state that we decline to return communications which, for any reason, we do not print; and to this rule we can make no exception.

LONDON, SATURDAY, MAY 26, 1877.

CONTENTS. - N° 178. NOTES:-The Champion of England and his Armour-St. Paul's Cathedral: Sermon by Samuel Stone, 1661, 401Carausius, British Sovereign and Emperor, 403-Simon de Breedon's Will, 1368, 404-Signs of Feelings-“Words and Places," 405-Transverse Passages-The Burials' Bill-Monuments to Queen Elizabeth-Marriage of a Cardinal-An Ulster Perversion, 406. QUERIES:-The Halsham Family, 407-"Experto crede Roberto"-Qasim, 408-The Key as an Emblem-"Essay on Woman"-Ball-Papillon-Barry E. O'Meara-St. Pancras, 409-"Not my parish "-Title of "Prince"-Sir W. Phipps-Miniature Portraits of W. H. Ireland-Corpse Chest-Lady A. Hamilton's "Secret History"-John Taylor, the Water Poet-Keats's Sonnet on a Picture of Leander Holt Family, 410-Basill Kennett-"Mother-in-law," 411. REPLIES:- Travail": "Travel," 411-William Alexander, first Earl of Stirling-Lingua Franca, 412-The Time of taking Meals by our Ancestors-The Title "Honourable," 413-Gibbon's Library at Lausanne-Arms of Ririd ap Cynfrig Efell, 414-Schomberg-Bocholtz-The "Spectator" Origin of boiling Peas, &c.-"Dyke": "Ditch"-Snail Telegraphs-"Vieux Noëls -Fees to Judges, 415-The "Englisches Feld," near Aspern-St. George's Day-The Orleans Family-Scott Family-Chaucer's Versification"Pale Gate"-Superstition in the West Highlands, 416"Next the heart"-Skinner of Dewlish, Devon-Charles Stuart-Madame de Solms-" Articles of High Treason," &c. -R. Topcliffe-Irish Hedge Schools-Italian Novels, 417Gambadoes-"Powder Pimperlimpimp"-Church Books of 1493-Miss Bowes-"Minnis"-Umbrellas-" Boughten," 418-"Between you and I"-Unusual Christian NamesThe Curtain Theatre: Manor of Hoggerston-Authors of Quotations Wanted, 419.

Notes.

THE CHAMPION OF ENGLAND AND HIS

ARMOUR.

The following memoranda were made by me from the Records of the Ordnance Department many years ago, with the intention of using them in illustration of a "Memoir of the Championship of England," which I then contemplated writing, but which design I have long since abandoned. The notes, in themselves interesting, may, however, be useful to others if Mr. Editor will give them a place in his valued columns.—

Memorandum, 10th April, 1689.-To Charles Dymock, Esq., their Majesties' Champion, for his use on the day of their Majesties' coronation :

(A.) One suit armour, cap-à-pie, white engraven and parcel gilt.

One manifair, white and parcel gilt.

One gauntlet, do.

One target, gilt, with gold fringe.

One sword with belt, crimson velvet.

One pair pistols.

One lance.

1685. April 23.-At the coronation of King James II. the Champion had a suit of armour, lance, and target out of the storehouse for the service of the day, which was returned in again; and a suit of armour was provided by His Majesty's warrant of the 15th May, 1685, and delivered 19th May, 1685, to the Champion for his fee, viz. :-One lance, one target, one gauntlet, one manifair,

from the stores.

At the coronation of King William and Queen Mary the Champion had delivered to him from the stores the armour mentioned above at A., for his use on the

day of their Majesties' coronation, which he never returned again into the storehouse, but kept for his fee. And at the coronation of Queen Anne he wore the same armour he did at the coronation of King William and Queen Mary, and from the storehouse he had only a lance, which was returned.

It appears, from a letter written 17th March, 1714, that the Champion received for his fee at the coronation of Queen Anne 50%., and furnished himself with everything.

Copy of a letter written by the Board [of Ordnance], 14th April, 1715, to Champion Dymoke, in answer to a letter the Champion writ me on 30th March, in answer to the letter on the other side sent him pr order of the Surveyor-General, who dictated it to me at his house, 17th March, 1714-5:

"Office of Ordnance, 14th April, 1715. "Sir, Mr. Nicholas having shewed us a letter of yours of 30th March, in which you demand the armour you had at the last coronation, we must acquaint you that, it being the armour of King Charles the Second, we cannot justify parting with the same, but, to prevent further trouble both to you and us, we have ordered to be paid you 601., which we hope will be to your satis

faction.

[blocks in formation]

One short gauntlet, white engraven and parcel gilt. One target painted with his arms and set round with silk fringe.

One lance, gilt, with silk fringe.

One sword, with scabbard of crimson velvet.
One belt of crimson velvet.

October 28, 1727.-Delivered then to the Master and

Wardens of the Company of Armourers and Braziers, the same being lent to them for their use on 30th inst., His Majesty's dining with the Lord Mayor of London in being His Majesty's birthday, the Lord Mayor's day, and the City, the armours hereafter mentioned :

One suit armour, cap-à-pie, of King Henry V.
Six suits armour for foot.
Two targets, parcel gilt.
Two battle-axes.
One flaming sword.
Six broad swords.

[blocks in formation]

ST. PAUL'S CATHEDRAL: SERMON BY SAMUEL STONE, 1661.

the large and valuable collection of separately printed I have spent some little time lately in examining sermons which are preserved in the Archbishop's Library at Lambeth. Many of them are, no doubt, of merely passing and ephemeral interest, but occasionally one lights upon a sermon which stands out conspicuously amongst its companions. may be remarkable for its eloquence and piety, or for other qualities not less striking but more unusual. I will leave it to your readers to classify as

It

« ZurückWeiter »