The provision of the Constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those which respect property, or some object of value, and confer rights which may be asserted in a court of justice. Wisconsin Reports: Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin - Seite 566von Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frderick C. Seibold - 1875Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
| John Marshall - 1905 - 518 Seiten
...have given us is not to be so construed, may be admitted. The provision of the constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice. It never has been understood to restrict the general right of the legislature to legislate on the subject... | |
| Everett Pepperrell Wheeler - 1905 - 218 Seiten
...provision of the constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those that respect property, or some object of value, and confer...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice." ' The court then proceeded to show that an educational institution founded by individuals and endowed... | |
| Luther S. Dixon - 1907 - 640 Seiten
...other contracts than those which respect property, or some object of value, and confer rights \vhich may be asserted in a court of justice." If property,...private corporations, and come as well within the prohibitions. So the court afterward found in East Hartford v. Hartford Bridge Co., 10 Howard, 511,... | |
| West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1909 - 828 Seiten
...the so-called right of redemption is not. Chief Justice Marshall said that to be a contract it must respect property or some object of value "and confer...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice." Cited in Railroad Co. v. Transportation Co., 25 W. Va. p. 354. What right had King which he could enforce... | |
| Joseph Asbury Joyce - 1909 - 1272 Seiten
...is not to be understood to embrace other contracts than those which respect property or some other object of value and confer rights which may be asserted in a court of justice.6 8 303. Obligation of Contract — Existence of Legal Contract — Impairment — State Statutes.... | |
| Roger William Cooley - 1913 - 368 Seiten
...but in answer to objections urged to positions taken: "The provision of the constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice It never has been understood to restrict the general right of the legislature to legislate on the subject... | |
| Eugene Allen Gilmore, William Charles Wermuth - 1914 - 874 Seiten
...have given us is not to be so construed, may be admitted. The provision of the constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice. It never has been understood to restrict the general right of the legislature to legislate on the subject... | |
| James Parker Hall - 1914 - 528 Seiten
...have given us is not to be so construed, may be admitted. The provision of the Constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice. It has never been understood to restrict the general right of the legislature to legislate on the subject... | |
| William Mark McKinney, Burdett Alberto Rich - 1915 - 1392 Seiten
...provision of the federal guaranty of contractual obligations: "This provision of the constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice. It never has been understood to restrict the general right of the legislature to legislate on the subject... | |
| Harvard University. Department of Government - 1917 - 166 Seiten
...have given us, is not to be so construed, may be admitted. The provision of the constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts, than those...rights which may be asserted in a court of justice. It never has been understood to restrict the general right of the legislature to legislate on the subject... | |
| |