 A person is not excused from criminal liability as an idiot, imbecile, lunatic, or insane person, except upon proof that, at the time of committing the alleged criminal act, he was laboring under such a defect of reason as: 1. Not to know the nature and...  The New York Supplement - Seite 1641898Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | American Academy of Medicine - 1914 - 200 Seiten
...responsibility exists. Under the New York law one accused is not excused on this ground, "excepting upon proof that at the time of committing the alleged...was laboring under such a defect of reason as either (i) not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, and (2) not to know that the act was... | |
 | American Academy of Medicine - 1914 - 200 Seiten
...responsibility exists. Under the New York law one accused is not excused on this ground, "excepting upon proof that at the time of committing the alleged...was laboring under such a defect of reason as either ( i ) not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, and (2) not to know that the act... | |
 | Henry Herbert Goddard - 1915 - 190 Seiten
...incapable of understanding the proceeding or making his defense. A person is not excused from criminal liability as an idiot, imbecile, lunatic, or insane person except upon proof that at the time of the committing of the alleged criminal act he was laboring under such a defect of reason as not to... | |
 | Henry Herbert Goddard - 1915 - 200 Seiten
...idiot, imbecile, lunatic, or insane person except upon proof that at the time of the committing of the alleged criminal act he was laboring under such a defect of reason as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing or know the nature of the act as wrong."... | |
 | Solomon Hecht, Julius Hochfelder - 1916 - 164 Seiten
...a person excused from criminal liability as an idiot, imbecile, lunatic or insane person? ANS.: — Upon proof that at the time of committing the alleged criminal act lie did not know the nature or gravity of the act he was doing, or did not know the act was wrong.... | |
 | New York (State). Board of Charities - 1917 - 1096 Seiten
...incapable of understanding the proceeding or making his defense. A person is not excused from criminal liability as an idiot, imbecile, lunatic, or insane...he was laboring under such a defect of reason as: 1. Not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing: or, 2. Not to know that tho act was... | |
 | New York (State). Legislature. Senate - 1917 - 1250 Seiten
...incapable of understanding the proceeding or making his defense. A person is not excused from criminal liability as an idiot, imbecile, lunatic, or insane...alleged criminal act, he was laboring under such a dffcot of reaison as: 1. Not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing: or, 2. Not to... | |
 | William Mack, William Benjamin Hale, Donald J. Kiser - 1918 - 1426 Seiten
...NW 62. [a] In New York, for example, (1) it Is provided that "a person is not excused from criminal liability as an idiot, imbecile, lunatic, or Insane...committing the alleged criminal act, he was laboring under euch a defect of reason as: 1. Not to know the nature and qualHy of the act he was doing; or, 2. Not... | |
 | Thomas Welburn Hughes - 1919 - 810 Seiten
...York, on the question of insanity, is in harmony with the English rule. It exempts a person only where "he was laboring under such a defect of reason as...he was doing, or (2) not to know that the act was wrong."29 § 71. Insanity a question of fact. — The existence or nonexistence of insanity in a particular... | |
| |
