 | United States - 1916 - 916 Seiten
...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | William Lynn Ransom - 1916 - 392 Seiten
...Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | 1917 - 1062 Seiten
...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | Herbert Confield Lust - 1917 - 1108 Seiten
...L. ed. 1341; 34 Sup. Ct. 833. In that case the court said: "Wherever the interstate and lntraetate transactions of carriers are so related that the government...Congress and not the state that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | Indiana State Bar Association (1916- ). Meeting - 1919 - 352 Seiten
...intra-state operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intra-state...Congress, and not the State that is entitled to prescribe the final dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota - 1918 - 520 Seiten
...operations of such carriers from 'being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to the Federal care. "Wherever the interstate and intrastate...other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is enitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would -be denied the exercise... | |
 | 1918 - 1264 Seiten
...Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule. Houston, E. & WTK Co. v. United States, 234 US 342, 58 L. ed. 1341, 34... | |
 | Henry Clifford Spurr, Ellsworth Nichols - 1918 - 1206 Seiten
...and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the effective regulation of one involves control of the other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the dominant rule. 4. It is admissible for Congress to provide for the execution of this power through... | |
| |
Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise... 
