...the regulation it should supply." [575] In the Shreveport Rate Case the Supreme Court held that: " Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule; otherwise the nation would not be supreme within the national field."...

...apply, "9ta and in Houston & Texas Ry. v. United States,94 known as the Shreveport rate case, namely : "Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional...

...and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the effective regulation of one involves control of the other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the dominant rule. 4. It is admissible for Congress to provide for the execution of this power through...

...constitutional grant of power; "it is of the essence of this power that, where it exists, it dominates," and it is Congress and not the State "that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional...

...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for othenvise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional...

...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided Congress. Annual taxes upon property in ships and...continually laid, and their validity was never doubted the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional...

...Cases was based upon the proposition that : In the Shreveport Rate Case the Supreme Court held that : "Wherever the Interstate and intrastate transactions...other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is entiled to prescribe the final and dominant rule; otherwise the nation would not be supreme within...

...Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional...

...in the latter. Justice Hughes, who rendered the opinion in both cases, said in the Shreveport Case: "Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule. ... It is for Congress to supply the needed correction. ... So far as...

...CALIFORNIA, Respondent. [1] CARRIERS — INTERSTATE AND INTBASTATE BUSINESS — CONTROL BY CONGRESS. — Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule. [2] ID. — UNION TEHMI.YAI, DEPOT FACILITIES — RAILROADS LARGELY ENGAGED...