 | Ellen Frankel Paul, Howard Dickman - 1989 - 316 Seiten
...unmistakable thrust of the opinion was to make the congressional power paramount over state authority: Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1924 - 962 Seiten
...commerce." [1] Numerous other cases may be cited from both federal and state courts sustaining the rule that wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | Peter H. Irons - 1993 - 376 Seiten
...and federal regulation of the same industry operated "to the injury of interstate commerce" then " it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule. . . ," 46 The Court took a further step in 1922 in Stafford v. Wallace... | |
 | Barry Cushman - 1998 - 333 Seiten
...carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other," he had written, "it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the dominant rule. . . ." 89 The source of this quotation was Houston, East and West Texas Railway... | |
 | Robert S. Maxwell - 1998 - 154 Seiten
...carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to Federal care. Whenever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers...Congress, and not the state, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional... | |
 | Walter F. Pratt - 1999 - 340 Seiten
...stating that the act would not apply to transportation "wholly within one State." In Hughes's words, "Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entided to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise... | |
 | James A. Curry, Richard B. Riley, Richard M. Battistoni - 2003 - 660 Seiten
...empowered to regulate, — that is, to provide the law for the government of interstate commerce. . . . Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions...Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule. The 1nterstate Commerce Commission exercised regulatory power over commerce... | |
 | 1914 - 446 Seiten
...intrastate operations of such carriers from being made a means of injury to that which has been confided to federal care. Wherever the interstate and intrastate...Congress and not the state that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule. * * It is also clear that in removing the injurious discriminations against... | |
| |
Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise... 
